20180912, 11:09  #1629 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
43×59 Posts 
C162 from 785232:i11446 for 14e queue
Code:
n: 120200802921012037919315743851322324648338387287699183328099465615901872437571638375522676889046805645100018711742445165451122601438764030595100336427729254081173 # norm 1.265296e15 alpha 6.802752 e 1.161e12 rroots 5 skew: 27986273.62 c0: 36891961793113385651782128115039492790875 c1: 4229635392040346226271944154082037 c2: 260433884364123901182411245 c3: 22747677353174073699 c4: 489986750080 c5: 4452 Y0: 30638702839885683853466656422426 Y1: 218304098080241773 rlim: 67000000 alim: 67000000 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 type: gnfs 
20180912, 15:03  #1630  
"Max"
Jun 2016
Toronto
1011001010_{2} Posts 
C162 poly
Quote:
Code:
Y0: 61277405373647460442775718918866 Y1: 218304098080241773 c0: 75543047841236298206569254372418080145020 c1: 9811299947071811429889849748908030 c2: 613642512052347317677082674 c3: 21351592179214966459 c4: 252797074370 c5: 1113 skew: 50937101.01 # size 1.144e15, alpha 7.755, combined = 1.248e12 rroots = 5 

20180912, 15:48  #1631 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2^{2}·3^{2}·7·13 Posts 
15e Candidate
C240 from the MWRB file with OPN weight of 6720 for the 15e queue.
Code:
n: 744822874420876233458923367945655307569152801862856562088507501346332816800292929072183589933446057869501960576430008108565773799257456260338665041117688020503279438090005561266763646471131309343423234949252179748225431168342729615301426721 # 4603759^371, difficulty: 247 skew: 0.0775 c6: 4603759 c0: 1 Y1: 1 Y0: 9520844789294346565511217928502073721441 type: snfs rlim: 67000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 Code:
Q Yield 20M 10368 60M 8326 100M 7070 150M 5638 200M 5284 250M 4531 
20180912, 20:30  #1632 
Sep 2009
1721_{8} Posts 
Although it would be slightly less efficient than using 15e, a 31bit LPs task of SNFS difficulty 247 would help filling the 14e queue.
But both queues are still broken anyway... 
20180912, 20:46  #1633 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2^{2}·3^{2}·7·13 Posts 
This is definitely a 32bit job if parameterized for the 14e queue. I was surprised how easy it worked as a 31bit for 15e.
Edit: The best I could squeeze in 14e was 134/200 31/91a/3.6. The yield at 60M was 1.36. The kick in the pants is the seven digit coefficient. Last fiddled with by RichD on 20180912 at 21:03 
20180913, 01:38  #1634 
Sep 2008
Kansas
6314_{8} Posts 
C231 from the MWRB file with an OPN weight of 4176 (for 14e).
Code:
n: 589470085638367943192974599027279943093828364938148311581636494878437898852030929478021141792049865392682126799756097273338295662495810826408804300923625102363936591501031429807074638456784409369277395132979916609500313986538937941 # 27409^531, difficulty: 239.65, skewness: 5.49, alpha: 0.00 # cost: 3.72874e+18, est. time: 1775.59 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 5.491 c6: 1 c0: 27409 Y1: 1 Y0: 8730491982047459268817962922083396659089 type: snfs rlim: 67000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 Code:
Q Yield 20M 13165 60M 9959 100M 8767 150M 7282 
20180913, 05:42  #1635 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2·3·19·41 Posts 
13*2^8601 is ready for the 14e queue:
EDIT: One should check ECM results file before posting to the queue. 13,860 has a P54 found by the last round of ECM (B1=650M). Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 20180913 at 05:50 
20180913, 09:44  #1636 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
100111101001_{2} Posts 
Poly from Max for C162 is clearly better (at least by 10% according to testsieve) than my, so lets use it.
Code:
n: 120200802921012037919315743851322324648338387287699183328099465615901872437571638375522676889046805645100018711742445165451122601438764030595100336427729254081173 Y0: 61277405373647460442775718918866 Y1: 218304098080241773 c0: 75543047841236298206569254372418080145020 c1: 9811299947071811429889849748908030 c2: 613642512052347317677082674 c3: 21351592179214966459 c4: 252797074370 c5: 1113 skew: 50937101.01 # size 1.144e15, alpha 7.755, combined = 1.248e12 rroots = 5 rlim: 67000000 alim: 67000000 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 type: gnfs Corrected sieving range is 15M70M. 
20180914, 00:11  #1637 
"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands
10010011000_{2} Posts 
For the OPN numbers, can we please keep the filenames on the server and the displaynames on the statuspage as recognisable as possible? (see what happened in the 14e)
My personal preference is the C200_1234567_89 names and not the Phi123/Phi45/6789 etc names. Just my 2 cents 
20180914, 14:17  #1638 
Sep 2009
977 Posts 
In fact, the 14e management Web interface automatically copies the field containing the "name", used for filenames, to the field containing the "display name". In RSALS times, as well as for more than the first half of NFS@Home's 14e activity so far, the name and the display name matched.
We could ask Greg to modify several lines in crunching.php and crunching_e.php so that the "Now sieving", "Queued for post processing" and "Post processing" tables contain the (currently missing) name and the (currently displayed) display name. How does that sound ? EDIT: * I have created 14e entries for the numbers since post #1623; * Rich, could you doublecheck that what you meant in #1631 + #1633 was: Code:
n: 744822874420876233458923367945655307569152801862856562088507501346332816800292929072183589933446057869501960576430008108565773799257456260338665041117688020503279438090005561266763646471131309343423234949252179748225431168342729615301426721 # 4603759^371, difficulty: 247 skew: 0.0775 c6: 4603759 c0: 1 Y1: 1 Y0: 9520844789294346565511217928502073721441 type: snfs rlim: 134000000 alim: 2004000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 97 rlambda: 3.6 alambda: 3.6 * tomorrow, I should be able to enter http://stdkmd.com/nrr/c.cgi?q=50009_239 into the 14e queue, unless my 16 GMPECM instances running curves at B1=43e6 find an unlikely factor by then. TIA. Last fiddled with by debrouxl on 20180914 at 14:55 
20180914, 22:29  #1639 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2^{2}·3^{2}·7·13 Posts 
What I meant by this is the following, meaning 3LP on the a side.
Code:
rlim: 134000000 alim: 200000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 91 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 3.6 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
System management notes  kriesel  kriesel  7  20201021 18:52 
Improving the queue management.  debrouxl  NFS@Home  10  20180506 21:05 
Scriptbased Primenet assignment management  ewmayer  Software  3  20170525 04:02 
Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast  there is no question!)  jasong  jasong  35  20161211 00:57 
Power Management settings  PrimeCroat  Hardware  3  20040217 19:11 