![]() |
![]() |
#2179 |
Feb 2012
Paris, France
7·23 Posts |
![]()
C161_3613045528091_17 is factored.
Code:
Thu Oct 12 13:15:21 2017 p70 factor: 6973758502234253884181929362856224995385676641649925515421567582226967 Thu Oct 12 13:15:21 2017 p91 factor: 2615526656926701787299805440932520462192513375052362998296857110075036721543122390667728507 Log attached and at https://pastebin.com/t01fTH5Z. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2180 |
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2·3,191 Posts |
![]()
YuL: you have some pretty impressive compute resource there! Would you be able to run for ~100 wall-clock hours to deal with Lucas(1321) ?
Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2017-10-12 at 13:52 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2181 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
10010010000102 Posts |
![]() Code:
prp89 factor: 36004488451441119651214513502118979442636734789885920973089090859209192780295366731792917 prp136 factor: 1267270686372475929419863116308088251546931487306166069492255355460668707763455774860254500940743946722371347667053477745796394829918369 log at https://pastebin.com/QzrLFYLq c226_143_57 is 30% complete, about two more weeks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2182 |
Feb 2012
Paris, France
7×23 Posts |
![]()
Amazon EC2, 100 hours of 4x r4.16xlarge would cost me ~480$ :-).
Last fiddled with by YuL on 2017-10-12 at 13:57 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2183 |
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
120910 Posts |
![]()
Reserving C192_249541_41 please.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2184 |
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
638210 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2185 |
Sep 2008
Kansas
22·32·7·13 Posts |
![]()
Taking C227_140_61 next.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2186 |
Sep 2008
Kansas
327610 Posts |
![]()
About 354 hours (power outage) to solve 19.7M matrix using -t 4, w/ TD=144.
Code:
p81 factor: 204743040471511957974607832522577158823452984876200257817529201941362845184315697 p145 factor: 2647406304735019701172167099689199866467319081702657342977655939289431878262715543870119797539665236347622085873613993044340283536212695425604817 Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2017-10-26 at 14:28 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2187 | |
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
3×13×31 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Code:
p93 factor: 914270024491921792401085778556927231150530617854161585172963998054586105241044056026056902827 p98 factor: 23790037067171663886838174425797681923684271024161057724917436107609767438289181684247267006610009 Factors added to Factordb. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2188 |
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
10AB16 Posts |
![]()
I'm post-processing C213_142_112 with 449159757 relations (I started it with a few relations still pending to be reported to NFS@Home). At first I tried a target_density of 120 (a standard value for me), but it failed to enter the LA step. So I tried it again without specifying a target_density and it has begun LA on 29.7 million dimensions.
Only thing is that it's estimating about 30 days on my i5-4670K to complete linear algebra. Is this to be expected, or is there something I should do to speed it up? I don't have a problem letting it run, just want to know I'm not wasting my time. ![]() Log attached. Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2017-10-15 at 12:31 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2189 | |
Jun 2012
B9116 Posts |
![]() Quote:
That said, a SNFS 263 is never going to be a one week job on a single machine. Good luck! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
restarting nfs linear algebra | cubaq | YAFU | 2 | 2017-04-02 11:35 |
Linear algebra at 600% | CRGreathouse | Msieve | 8 | 2009-08-05 07:25 |
Linear algebra crashes | 10metreh | Msieve | 3 | 2009-02-02 08:34 |
Linear algebra proof | Damian | Math | 8 | 2007-02-12 22:25 |
Linear algebra in MPQS | R1zZ1 | Factoring | 2 | 2007-02-02 06:45 |