mersenneforum.org Jame$Webb Terre$trial Tele\$cope
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2021-10-13, 14:22   #12
kriesel

"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

132268 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Dr Sardonicus This is new technology. There were bound to be unforeseen problems along the way. Of course the development costs were high. Now that we've worked those things out, what we need to do is produce a fleet of space telescopes, in order to get the unit cost down.
Or do 20 such development projects, just skip treating cancer for a year. https://www.progressreport.cancer.go...conomic_burden
All those unemployed doctors, nurses, radiology technicians etc may not be very effective engineers, machinists, etc. though without a lot of retraining that would take more than a year.

2021-10-13, 14:38   #13
xilman
Bamboozled!

"𒉺𒌌𒇷𒆷𒀭"
May 2003
Down not across

1095210 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kriesel Or do 20 such development projects, just skip treating cancer for a year. https://www.progressreport.cancer.go...conomic_burden All those unemployed doctors, nurses, radiology technicians etc may not be very effective engineers, machinists, etc. though without a lot of retraining that would take more than a year.
I believe the technical term is "opportunity cost".

2021-10-13, 15:37   #14
kriesel

"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

2·72·59 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by xilman I believe the technical term is "opportunity cost".
Opportunity cost is a primarily economics term. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunity_cost An opportunity cost analysis informed by college placement office data is why I did not go for a PhD, although strongly encouraged by certain faculty, and employment interviewers seemed quite satisfied with that answer.

It's a multiyear project for an individual to become adequately trained in a technical field as distinct from medical care as optics, aerospace engineering or manufacturing.

Time lags in responding to choices motivated by shifting economic parameters contribute toward irreversibility. http://perrings.faculty.asu.edu/pdf_...RRE_(2009).pdf

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2021-10-13 at 15:39

2021-10-13, 19:56   #15
frmky

Jul 2003
So Cal

22·547 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Dr Sardonicus Now that we've worked those things out, what we need to do is produce a fleet of space telescopes, in order to get the unit cost down.
There most assuredly will be, or perhaps are, reconnaissance satellites that share some of the technology of the JWST.

2021-10-13, 20:06   #16
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

22×41×61 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by frmky There most assuredly will be, or perhaps are, reconnaissance satellites that share some of the technology of the JWST.
Optical recon sats don't really need to. The seeing will become an issue once one goes beyond the KeyHole sats with mirrors the size of Hubble. How much resolution do you want? Just 2 mirrors the size of Hubble can be deployed in a simpler way than JWST and create and effective diameter 3x that of Hubble. Electronic eavesdropping on the other hand.... there are some with antennae reflectors about the size of JWST's sun shield. I wish that had picked up or saved the button for the cover mission that I saw at JPL for that.

 2021-10-13, 20:29 #17 frmky     Jul 2003 So Cal 22·547 Posts Yes, Orion-class satellites are thought to have reflectors larger than JWST's sun shield. But it's not just the large mirrors. The steering system for JWST's secondary mirror seems closely guarded.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Zhangrc Marin's Mersenne-aries 20 2021-10-19 14:27 odin Software 4 2010-08-08 20:23 jocelynl Math 8 2006-02-01 14:12 delta_t Software 5 2004-02-23 16:09 michael Software 23 2004-01-06 08:54

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:26.

Wed Oct 20 08:26:29 UTC 2021 up 89 days, 2:55, 0 users, load averages: 2.75, 3.08, 2.93