# Infinity Times Zero is Not Zero

The problem is that the laws of addition and multiplication you are using hold for natural numbers, but infinity is not a natural number, so these laws do not apply. If they did, you could use a similar argument that multiplying anything by infinity, no matter how small, gives infinity, thus ∞×0=∞. More sophisticated arguments can also be made, like ∞×0=limx→∞(x×1/x)=1. Clearly all these different values for ∞×0 mean that ∞ cannot be treated like other numbers.

In order to work with infinity, you must first define it. You may think you know what infinity is, but really you don't have a concrete definition. In fact, there are many different definitions of infinity that you could use, each of which result in different behaviors. For example, the real projective line has a concept of infinity such that 1/∞=0, while when talking about infinite sets one uses cardinal numbers (another type of infinity) to represent the sizes of these sets. You must make it clear what infinity you are talking about in order to work with it.

In summary, the expression ∞×0 using multiplication defined for the natural numbers does not have any meaning, so it cannot be said to be equal to 0.

## Notes:

**Folksonomies:** mathematics

**Taxonomies:**

/science/mathematics/arithmetic (0.565606)

/religion and spirituality/atheism and agnosticism (0.384472)

/science/mathematics/geometry (0.324904)

**Keywords:**

infinity (0.977347 (positive:0.251817)), Infinity Times Zero (0.787774 (neutral:0.000000)), real projective line (0.497312 (neutral:0.000000)), natural numbers (0.486364 (neutral:0.000000)), Zero The problem (0.399367 (neutral:0.000000)), sophisticated arguments (0.390039 (positive:0.292214)), similar argument (0.383305 (neutral:0.000000)), natural number (0.374031 (negative:-0.293879)), concrete definition (0.369190 (neutral:0.000000)), different values (0.358415 (neutral:0.000000)), different behaviors (0.353076 (neutral:0.000000)), different definitions (0.348183 (neutral:0.000000)), cardinal numbers (0.345288 (neutral:0.000000)), multiplication (0.303968 (neutral:0.000000)), laws (0.265652 (negative:-0.469946)), hold (0.241321 (neutral:0.000000)), mean (0.238775 (neutral:0.000000)), addition (0.238274 (neutral:0.000000)), matter (0.235851 (neutral:0.000000)), infinite (0.235391 (neutral:0.000000)), x×1/x (0.234090 (neutral:0.000000)), meaning (0.232571 (neutral:0.000000)), expression (0.231879 (neutral:0.000000)), example (0.231631 (neutral:0.000000)), fact (0.230885 (neutral:0.000000)), concept (0.230390 (neutral:0.000000)), sizes (0.230306 (positive:0.207344))

**Concepts:**

Set theory (0.952071): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc

Number (0.895008): dbpedia | freebase

Real number (0.842957): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc

Mathematics (0.837188): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc

Natural number (0.811666): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc

Countable set (0.757426): dbpedia | freebase | yago

Integer (0.734555): dbpedia | freebase | opencyc

Cardinality (0.693498): dbpedia | freebase

**Why is Infinity multiplied by Zero not an easy Zero answer?**

**Electronic/World Wide Web>**

**Message Posted to Online Forum/Discussion Group:**Schroder, Ashley

*, Why is Infinity multiplied by Zero not an easy Zero answer?*, Retrieved on 2015-02-04

**Folksonomies:**mathematics