mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data > Marin's Mersenne-aries

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-06-06, 17:27   #1486
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

29×113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
I think it would be a good idea to strategically double-check at least half of this users exponents. Based on the data that comes back, we might then double-check the other half.
I've got a query already setup that will pull the smallest unassigned exponent for a particular year/month of any matching criteria (in this case a specific CPU). It comes in handy for spot checking...

Here's that list, in chronological order.

Code:
Exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	worktodo
43191191	0	14	7	DoubleCheck=43191191,72,1
45537641	0	2	3	DoubleCheck=45537641,72,1
41953489	0	4	7	DoubleCheck=41953489,72,1
46388297	0	1	1	DoubleCheck=46388297,72,1
44405707	0	1	4	DoubleCheck=44405707,72,1
43518661	0	7	2	DoubleCheck=43518661,72,1
42316943	0	2	6	DoubleCheck=42316943,72,1
41721523	0	4	3	DoubleCheck=41721523,72,1
47556689	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=47556689,72,1
44258833	0	2	1	DoubleCheck=44258833,72,1
44169109	0	2	6	DoubleCheck=44169109,72,1
45602677	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=45602677,72,1
45414253	0	1	7	DoubleCheck=45414253,72,1
45414401	0	4	2	DoubleCheck=45414401,72,1
44095913	0	5	3	DoubleCheck=44095913,72,1
43849327	0	3	6	DoubleCheck=43849327,72,1
40289297	0	8	3	DoubleCheck=40289297,72,1
45591499	0	8	1	DoubleCheck=45591499,72,1
46157549	0	2	3	DoubleCheck=46157549,72,1
50928337	0	1	14	DoubleCheck=50928337,73,1
43220833	0	1	8	DoubleCheck=43220833,72,1
50752483	0	1	7	DoubleCheck=50752483,73,1
48738539	0	0	10	DoubleCheck=48738539,72,1
43454707	0	1	14	DoubleCheck=43454707,72,1
43482251	0	4	10	DoubleCheck=43482251,72,1
45921341	0	1	11	DoubleCheck=45921341,72,1
50505359	0	2	12	DoubleCheck=50505359,73,1
50488463	0	2	17	DoubleCheck=50488463,73,1
50737123	0	0	8	DoubleCheck=50737123,73,1
50513509	0	0	24	DoubleCheck=50513509,73,1
47880529	0	1	2	DoubleCheck=47880529,72,1
53644573	0	1	22	DoubleCheck=53644573,73,1
51220769	1	3	17	DoubleCheck=51220769,73,1
50419043	0	2	31	DoubleCheck=50419043,73,1
50051017	1	2	17	DoubleCheck=50051017,73,1
47304703	0	3	27	DoubleCheck=47304703,72,1
51781361	1	1	14	DoubleCheck=51781361,73,1
51466607	1	4	17	DoubleCheck=51466607,73,1
55061443	0	0	23	DoubleCheck=55061443,73,1
55109911	0	0	9	DoubleCheck=55109911,73,1
55329581	0	0	17	DoubleCheck=55329581,73,1
54430973	0	0	18	DoubleCheck=54430973,73,1
51223423	0	0	24	DoubleCheck=51223423,73,1
60475829	0	0	6	DoubleCheck=60475829,74,1
51914539	0	0	22	DoubleCheck=51914539,73,1
51916897	0	2	14	DoubleCheck=51916897,73,1
58945283	0	1	17	DoubleCheck=58945283,73,1
56899343	0	0	17	DoubleCheck=56899343,73,1
57421031	0	0	28	DoubleCheck=57421031,73,1
60002291	1	2	19	DoubleCheck=60002291,74,1
62647661	0	1	13	DoubleCheck=62647661,74,1
58907749	1	5	11	DoubleCheck=58907749,73,1
61500731	7	6	11	DoubleCheck=61500731,74,1
55897211	5	9	19	DoubleCheck=55897211,73,1
61222081	6	4	7	DoubleCheck=61222081,74,1
60939001	0	2	21	DoubleCheck=60939001,74,1
61037629	2	2	16	DoubleCheck=61037629,74,1
63181423	1	2	13	DoubleCheck=63181423,74,1
63530827	0	0	15	DoubleCheck=63530827,74,1
63683693	0	0	14	DoubleCheck=63683693,74,1
63683929	0	0	10	DoubleCheck=63683929,74,1
63683621	0	0	14	DoubleCheck=63683621,74,1
65062643	0	0	17	DoubleCheck=65062643,74,1
64681307	0	0	14	DoubleCheck=64681307,74,1
66229081	0	0	19	DoubleCheck=66229081,75,1
66698507	2	2	8	DoubleCheck=66698507,75,1
72629587	2	2	4	DoubleCheck=72629587,75,1
72629749	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=72629749,75,1
67854097	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=67854097,75,1
75059249	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=75059249,75,1
67854053	0	0	12	DoubleCheck=67854053,75,1
68360059	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=68360059,75,1
68699989	0	0	8	DoubleCheck=68699989,75,1
72893761	0	1	16	DoubleCheck=72893761,75,1
73829731	0	0	6	DoubleCheck=73829731,75,1
73656907	0	0	7	DoubleCheck=73656907,75,1
77486791	0	8	3	DoubleCheck=77486791,75,1
77486441	0	3	4	DoubleCheck=77486441,75,1
78212009	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=78212009,75,1
78431653	0	1	3	DoubleCheck=78431653,75,1
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2017-06-06, 21:25   #1487
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

29·113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
I think it would be a good idea to strategically double-check at least half of this users exponents. Based on the data that comes back, we might then double-check the other half.
By the way, I just thought of this and it would be a little bit of a "cheat" but we could "persuade" the general masses to do strategic double-checking by marking potentially wrong results as "suspect" and make them available for first-time checks.

When a computer itself encounters certain errors and turns in a suspect result, that's exactly what happens anyway... in this case we'd be doing what *should* have happened and mark it as suspect so it's checked again much sooner.

I think I saw that a "suspect" result has a 50/50 chance of being correct, if I remember what I found when analyzing the error codes... I think the lists we're pulling of "probably bad" is actually better than that at spotting bad results.

Anyway, just a thought, although it might mess up some reporting where we've already crossed several milestones for first-time checks, but suddenly marking a bunch as suspect and available for a "new first time check" would gum things up for a bit.
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2017-06-06, 21:40   #1488
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

258110 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
By the way, I just thought of this and it would be a little bit of a "cheat" but we could "persuade" the general masses to do strategic double-checking by marking potentially wrong results as "suspect" and make them available for first-time checks.
But the "general masses" will just churn and expire those strategic exponents. We want them to actually get done, and in a timely fashion. Hence this thread.
GP2 is offline  
Old 2017-06-07, 02:14   #1489
ewmayer
2ω=0
 
ewmayer's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Rep├║blica de California

982310 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP2 View Post
The triple checks on exponents 53648893, 53648981, 53648423, 53647547 will finish within a few hours, in that order. The first one is already at 51M and the slowest is almost at 49M. All interim residues are still matching.
I see the first 3 matched my Mlucas-on-overheating-Ryzen-system results - what is ETA on the fourth?
ewmayer is offline  
Old 2017-06-07, 04:04   #1490
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

1010000101012 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ewmayer View Post
I see the first 3 matched my Mlucas-on-overheating-Ryzen-system results - what is ETA on the fourth?
As of right this very instant, it's 99.72% complete... so in about 40 minutes from now.
GP2 is offline  
Old 2017-06-07, 04:37   #1491
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

29·113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP2 View Post
But the "general masses" will just churn and expire those strategic exponents. We want them to actually get done, and in a timely fashion. Hence this thread.
Most of them would be sub category zero (if that's a thing...)
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2017-06-07, 21:15   #1492
ewmayer
2ω=0
 
ewmayer's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Rep├║blica de California

11·19·47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP2 View Post
As of right this very instant, it's 99.72% complete... so in about 40 minutes from now.
And, I see we match on that one as well. Thanks for jumping on these - big relief to know I haven't been wasting all those Ryzen cycles David Stanfill has generously gifted me with. (Not even in the subpar-performance sense, as on Ryzen I get ~90% the throughput of mprime, avx2-builds for both.)
ewmayer is offline  
Old 2017-06-13, 20:26   #1493
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

29×113 Posts
Default

Here's a short list... this machine has been trending towards the "bad" side of the equation, now with overall stats of 20 bad, 21 good.

Below is a list of the smallest available exponent for any month where the bad>=good (and it might mean no bad/no good). It'll help fill in some unknowns about when the system started to rot... seems like around late 2010 but there are gaps there where no DC's have been done yet.

Code:
Exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	worktodo
41654687	0	0	2	DoubleCheck=41654687,72,1
44526941	0	0	1	DoubleCheck=44526941,72,1
46594763	0	0	7	DoubleCheck=46594763,72,1
46708141	2	0	2	DoubleCheck=46708141,72,1
47521781	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=47521781,72,1
50613733	1	1	3	DoubleCheck=50613733,73,1
50896471	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=50896471,73,1
52944533	1	1	2	DoubleCheck=52944533,73,1
53674261	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=53674261,73,1
55885723	0	0	4	DoubleCheck=55885723,73,1
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2017-06-14, 15:27   #1494
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

29·113 Posts
Default

I don't know if it's just me, but I found one of the user names in this exponent report to be hilarious in its honesty:
M46205657

That's the 2nd bad result from I've seen from it (it doesn't have any more outstanding).
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2017-06-19, 01:50   #1495
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
U.S.A.

167810 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
I don't know if it's just me, but I found one of the user names in this exponent report to be hilarious in its honesty:
M46205657

That's the 2nd bad result from I've seen from it (it doesn't have any more outstanding).
I see where you ran another DC on June 14. There must be something 'flaky' going on with his hardware. Of course, this is just a guess on my part.

I suppose a lot of what he/she ran will need to be checked...

Last fiddled with by storm5510 on 2017-06-19 at 01:52
storm5510 is offline  
Old 2017-06-19, 15:25   #1496
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

29×113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by storm5510 View Post
I see where you ran another DC on June 14. There must be something 'flaky' going on with his hardware. Of course, this is just a guess on my part.

I suppose a lot of what he/she ran will need to be checked...
Yeah, I did a spot check of another one but it matched, so maybe I just hit a few bad ones as a result of my triple-checking.

I may check it out again or just do another roundup of "maybe bad, but let's test one more and see" kind of work.
Madpoo is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Double-Double Arithmetic Mysticial Software 50 2017-10-30 19:16
Clicking an exponent leads to 404 page marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56
x.265 half the size, double the computation; so if you double again? 1/4th? jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56
What about double-checking TF/P-1? 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01
Double the area, Double the volume. Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 07:03.

Tue Nov 24 07:03:15 UTC 2020 up 75 days, 4:14, 4 users, load averages: 1.70, 1.81, 1.75

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.