mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-10-28, 06:51   #1
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

1,597 Posts
Default New credit parameters for some exponents

It is only normal that the credit awarded takes into account the new FFT sizes introduced by version 26.3.

I have a problem though : I recently completed a doublecheck on M25883279, according to the pre 26.3 FFT sizes and credits I should have received 25,7395 GHz day credits. PrimeNet only gave 22,8205. So instead of 0,08592 GHz seconds of credit per iteration PrimeNet used 0,076176253 GHz seconds (because of rounding it is something between 0,076176086 and 0,076176420.) In the sources of Prime95 26,3 I cannot find that value.

Is it possible to publish the new credit computation tables ?

Jacob
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-10-28, 09:17   #2
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

2·5·251 Posts
Default

Prime95 reports the FFT size that was used and Primenet gives credit accordingly.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-10-28, 11:57   #3
Kevin
 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Ann Arbor, MI

43310 Posts
Default

I have a question along the same lines. Roughly since upgrading to version 26.3 from 26.2, I've been getting about .5GHZ days less on P-1 tests in the same exponent range with the same B1/B2 settings. I understand that Prime95 using different FFT sizes will lead to different amount of credits, but that change should have happened when I upgraded to 26.2, not to 26.3 . I can't think of any good reason for why the change in credit has only occurred recently.
Kevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-10-28, 14:35   #4
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

2×3×1,193 Posts
Default

Until a few days ago, Primenet looked up the FFT length in a timings table. This table had timings for all FFT lengths that are 5,6,7,or 8 * a power of 2 (that is all the FFT lengths that version 25 supported).

Version 26 was released with new FFT lengths. What happened when you reported a result with a FFT length not in the table? The server used an alternate method to get the timing by looking at the exponent that was tested.

An example: exponent = 52M, v25 FFTlen = 3M, v26 FFTlen = 2800K. Prime95 v25 uses 3M FFT and gets credit for a 3M FFT. Prime95 v26 uses a 2800K FFT, the server has no entry for that, the server thinks 52M exponents are tested with 3M FFTs, you get credit for a 3M FFT.

Earlier this week this changed. If a timing lookup fails, the server will interpolate the timings for 2560K and 3M FFTs to come up with a reasonable estimate for the 2800K FFT.
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-10-28, 21:22   #5
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

5·19·47 Posts
Default I'm okay...

My "gains" and "losses" probably balance.

I've had a few exponents start an exponent under 25.9 and finish quicker under 26.2 but get full credit based on the old FFT
AND
more recently some that got the lower credit of the smaller FFT even though some of the work was slower with the larger FFT and 25.9 code.

My P-1 core when first upgraded to 26.2 and the new FFT sizes got the same credit with about a 5% speed improvement.
AND
more recently the credit for P-1 in the same 53M range, same B1/B2 has dropped fom 4.4061 per to 4.1073: about 7% less.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mmff parameters MattcAnderson Operazione Doppi Mersennes 2 2015-07-08 15:28
Claiming credit for exponents Unregistered Information & Answers 1 2009-06-05 04:20
optimal parameters for GMP-ECM , -oe+ , -I Walter Nissen GMP-ECM 16 2007-03-20 19:35
GIMPS Credit for Exponents Between 79.3 Million and 596 Million jinydu Lounge 25 2006-12-22 10:54
ECM parameters for RSA Spider Factoring 24 2006-06-05 23:42

All times are UTC. The time now is 19:04.

Thu Nov 26 19:04:57 UTC 2020 up 77 days, 16:15, 3 users, load averages: 1.06, 1.39, 1.46

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.