![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Dec 2005
22×72 Posts |
![]()
You have a set of k!+k-1 elements (k>1), numbered 1, 2,..., k!+k-1 .
Let A be the set of subsets with exactly k elements. Let B be the set of subsets with exactly k-1 elements, which includes also all the permutations of such a subset (so if for instance k=4 then the subsets {1,2,3},{1,3,2},{2,3,1},{2,1,3},{3,1,2}{3,2,1} are all in B. Evidently #A=#B Can you construct a bijection f such that f(A_i)=B_i and such that for all i A_i contains B_i ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Dec 2005
22·72 Posts |
![]()
In all honesty, for me it is an open question
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Jun 2004
Chicago
2810 Posts |
![]()
Given a k-element subset, remove any of the k elements, this clearly is a permutation of k-1 elements.
Take a set (k-1)-element subsets of the same k-1 elements. There are k! remaining elements that can be placed back into the (k-1)-element subsets. Now, there are exactly k repeated k-element subsets doing this process, so there are only (k-1)! that can be added to each set of permutations. Now there are (k-1)! permutations, and (k-1)! elements that can be added to those permutations, adding an element to each permutation out of the possible (k-1)! elements gives a distinct k-element subset. Therefore, bijection. --- is that what you were looking for, or am I off? Last fiddled with by jebeagles on 2006-05-04 at 01:04 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Dec 2005
22·72 Posts |
![]()
At least you are trying for a solution. I wonder however whether I should accept this solution. It seems all right, but it silently assumes the following:
if during the process of 'adding' an element out of the (k-1)! available to one of the (k-1)! permutations we get a k-subset twice, this would mean that another k-subset does not get attributed and we should be able to settle that. There is yet another snag: for the moment we have only looked at one subset of k-1 elements.There are however quite some subsets of k-1 elements. Are we still getting distinct k-subsets ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Dec 2005
22×72 Posts |
![]()
you are right, the second part of my answer is gibberish at best...
![]() ![]() what jebeagles is showing is the following: we have the set {1,...,k!+k-1} and we take some subset of k-1 elements. say {1,...,k-1}. To this subset we can 'add' k! different elements. Here we have our first problem. The number of sets {1,...,k-1} including permutations is (k-1)! How to add the remaining elements? (we had k!=(k-1)! * k elements remaining after selecting k-1 elements). So which do we select ? And what happens to the selectionprocedures for other subsets (for instance {1,...,k-2,k}) after this selection. Can we still fill. I am not really satisfied with the answer, actually. All that seems to be shown is that the two sets have the same size (which I offered at the beginning of the problem). If that was the end to it, we would obviously have a bijection. But the extra condition makes this unclear for me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Aug 2003
Upstate NY, USA
2·163 Posts |
![]()
If you number the subsets by ranking from least to greatest for first term, then second term, then third term, then fourth
i.e. A1={1,2,3,4} A2={1,2,4,3} A3={1,3,2,4} A4={1,3,4,2} ... and f({a,b,c,d})={a,b,c} then B1={1,2,3} B2={1,2,4} B3={1,3,2} B4={1,3,4} ... which I believe meets your requirements, but I may be reading something incorrectly |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Dec 2005
22×72 Posts |
![]()
The problem is that the subsets in A do not have permutations of themselves
A1=(1,2,3,4), A2=(1,2,3,5) B1=(1,2,3), B2=(1,3,2) ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Combinatorics news | Nick | Combinatorics & Combinatorial Number Theory | 7 | 2019-12-14 15:25 |
Stacking boxes - combinatorics? | Ken_g6 | Puzzles | 15 | 2010-08-04 23:30 |