![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Apr 2014
10101012 Posts |
![]()
Not sure if this is just a timer issue or it's actually taking longer, need to verify, but once Prime95 on Mac loses focus for an extended period of time, iteration times increase by a substantial amount. I leave it running during work and check in every once in awhile, for the numbers I'm working on it's ~12-13 seconds per update (when it has focus). However, if the program doesn't have focus for awhile, it starts saying ~22-23 seconds per update. As soon as the program regains focus it starts once again saying 12-13 seconds per update. I think it's just the timer value being used is unreliable, I don't think it's actually losing processor time.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
53×67 Posts |
![]()
This is Mavericks saving power by down-clocking the CPU when the foreground tasks aren't using the processor. I found an OS call to disable this feature. There will be a new preference item in 28.5 build 2 (not out yet).
In the meantime, make prime95 the foreground task whenever you leave your computer. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
prime95 in a Docker container issue/question | daxmick | Software | 1 | 2017-12-03 16:06 |
prime95 in a Docker container issue/question | daxmick | Information & Answers | 6 | 2017-12-03 15:19 |
Windows 7 Windows Update & Prime95 issue!!! | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 14 | 2010-04-10 21:47 |
Feature request: Stress test timer | CADavis | Software | 2 | 2007-04-17 02:09 |
Page timer... | Xyzzy | Lounge | 13 | 2003-05-22 19:14 |