20090528, 02:56  #1 
Jun 2003
2^{2}×3×409 Posts 
Poly search for c137 from 4788:2408
Msieve poly selection is running as we speak. The best so far is a 2.598e011
Code:
# norm 2.382543e013 alpha 5.301333 e 2.598e011 skew: 578768.66 c0: 1763425653816471802738051961171671 c1: 11885260797631750454737023644 c2: 12590841099436023132739 c3: 116148256294550959 c4: 78182860513 c5: 64920 Y0: 219917226017262591926478146 Y1: 1468762834311427 Last fiddled with by axn on 20090528 at 02:56 Reason: pol51 
20090528, 04:13  #2 
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
2×1,061 Posts 
Running as I type....defpar.txt says "good score" = 2.36e11, so you're already above that.
EDIT  I might have to lower the score on this one. It's spending <1 minute per range of 1000 and it's at 108000 for the leading coeff and hasn't found a single one.... Last fiddled with by schickel on 20090528 at 04:23 Reason: Adding edit 
20090528, 06:39  #3 
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
2122_{10} Posts 
Oooo, here's some competition!
Code:
n: 33394216768938431606284844335286015008160763986268372830143483319857070474702151118728076745861475926443431154791935815843723403599058047 skew: 380204.79 # norm 8.18e+018 c5: 437580 c4: 151401678354 c3: 166654413883998751 c2: 18263435604278312833637 c1: 10271498836939010389970521791 c0: 345405754370219656887496273785663 # alpha 6.27 Y1: 3405582965975849 Y0: 150148873411964740617516088 # Murphy_E 3.04e011 # M 16102758412869371469144341230247260992967096724913307932807892303105928036017844299082317921236274622278668935625336307618946927124632095 
20090528, 06:59  #4  
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471
29×41 Posts 
Quote:
I started at 5000 and best so far is 2.62e011 

20090528, 07:06  #5 
Nov 2008
100100010010_{2} Posts 
Frank, can you merge the poly search details into the newly created sieve thread?

20090528, 07:07  #6  
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
2×1,061 Posts 
Quote:
Next question is, do we need to do more ECM, or do we call it good? 

20090528, 07:08  #7 
Jun 2003
132C_{16} Posts 

20090528, 07:20  #8 
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
100001001010_{2} Posts 

20090528, 07:24  #9 
Nov 2008
100100010010_{2} Posts 

20090528, 07:31  #10 
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
2×1,061 Posts 

20090528, 14:08  #11 
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471
29×41 Posts 
I didn't find anything better than 2.81
I did some limited testing with the above poly: Code:
14e sp 12M, lpb 28 total yield: 4325, q=10001009 (0.05886 sec/rel) 13e sp 12M, lpb 28 total yield: 2030, q=10001009 (0.04753 sec/rel) 14e sp 12M, lpb 27 total yield: 2131, q=10001009 (0.11947 sec/rel) 13e sp 12M, lpb 27 total yield: 1001, q=10001009 (0.09609 sec/rel) 13e sp 10M, lpb 28 total yield: 2000, q=10001009 (0.04623 sec/rel) 13e sp 16M, lpb 28 total yield: 2074, q=10001009 (0.05032 sec/rel) Last fiddled with by smh on 20090528 at 14:09 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Poly search candidates  schickel  Msieve  32  20131105 19:11 
Poly Search vs Sieving times  EdH  Factoring  10  20131014 20:00 
gpu poly search error  bdodson  Msieve  10  20101109 19:46 
Poly search for c157 from 4788:2422  henryzz  Aliquot Sequences  59  20090704 06:27 
Team sieve #6: c137 from 4788:2408  10metreh  Aliquot Sequences  65  20090604 13:58 