20220105, 11:29  #1387 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
809 Posts 
@Edwin : Just to make sure I understand, this pictogram does refer to elves, doesn't it ?

20220105, 13:57  #1388  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
119E_{16} Posts 
Quote:
The reason for the note about main project reservations was to remark that it was not anonymous and not me. As to tracking, I would not suggest trying to add anyone who does not join the project. I suppose any open ended merges, which are the only ones tracked, should be checked for reservation by the person working the sequence and should not be addressed by yourself. Thanks for all the work you do in maintaining the tables. 

20220105, 14:47  #1389  
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
2^{2}×7×53 Posts 
Quote:
Rich 

20220105, 16:38  #1390 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
809 Posts 

20220105, 17:05  #1391 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
809 Posts 
Regarding your remarks on the reservations of merging sequences, I think you are right : we have to be careful and do what is necessary to avoid that several people make the same calculations for the same sequence.
Please, in the "Definitions" table on this page (http://www.aliquotes.com/aliquotes_p..._entieres.html), is it a good idea to replace this line : Code:
Yellow background of sequence: this sequence merges with given one as tooltip Code:
Yellow background of sequence: this sequence merges with given one as tooltip, Check the blue page of the main project to see if this sequence is Free for reservation. 
20220105, 20:29  #1392  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
1000110011110_{2} Posts 
Quote:


20220106, 18:35  #1393 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
809 Posts 
OK, I will make this change in the next update.
Thanks to you for your advice. 
20220112, 21:33  #1396 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
809 Posts 
I take new base 88.

20220115, 11:57  #1397 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
809_{10} Posts 
I wanted to examine the first terms of the base 800 = 2 * 20^2.
And I had a pleasant surprise : all the calculations were done for base 800 up to exponent 58 ! And unless I am mistaken, it is impossible that the calculations of the lower bases have completed the base 800, as for example the calculations of the base 2 can complete the bases 4, 8, 16, 32... So I will add the base 800 to the project page, but I don't know who did the calculations. If the person who made these calculations wants to come forward here for attribution, I can add his name for the base 800 sequences in the next update. 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Broken aliquot sequences  fivemack  FactorDB  46  20210221 10:46 
Broken aliquot sequences  schickel  FactorDB  18  20130612 16:09 
A new theorem about aliquot sequences  garambois  Aliquot Sequences  34  20120610 21:53 
poaching aliquot sequences...  Andi47  FactorDB  21  20111229 21:11 
New article on aliquot sequences  schickel  mersennewiki  0  20081230 07:07 