mersenneforum.org Aliquot sequences that start on the integer powers n^i
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2022-01-05, 11:29 #1387 garambois     "Garambois Jean-Luc" Oct 2011 France 80910 Posts @Edwin : Just to make sure I understand, this pictogram does refer to elves, doesn't it ?
2022-01-05, 13:57   #1388
EdH

"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009

451210 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by garambois @Edwin : Just to make sure I understand, this pictogram does refer to elves, doesn't it ?
That is the board's icon for Anonymous. If you hover over it, does it not display its title?

The reason for the note about main project reservations was to remark that it was not anonymous and not me. As to tracking, I would not suggest trying to add anyone who does not join the project. I suppose any open ended merges, which are the only ones tracked, should be checked for reservation by the person working the sequence and should not be addressed by yourself.

Thanks for all the work you do in maintaining the tables.

2022-01-05, 14:47   #1389
richs

"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

33×5×11 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by richs I've been working on 385^4 via a merge with 903872, so please reserve this one for me.
Please do whatever you think best. I have participated a small amount in this project over time, and I did not want to waste anyone else's effort on this particular number. I did reserve 903872 on the blue page for that reason.

Rich

2022-01-05, 16:38   #1390
garambois

"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France

809 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by EdH That is the board's icon for Anonymous. If you hover over it, does it not display its title?
If its title is displayed, but I hadn't noticed it !

 2022-01-05, 17:05 #1391 garambois     "Garambois Jean-Luc" Oct 2011 France 809 Posts Regarding your remarks on the reservations of merging sequences, I think you are right : we have to be careful and do what is necessary to avoid that several people make the same calculations for the same sequence. Please, in the "Definitions" table on this page (http://www.aliquotes.com/aliquotes_p..._entieres.html), is it a good idea to replace this line : Code: Yellow background of sequence: this sequence merges with given one as tooltip with this one with the part in bold on a orange background ? Code: Yellow background of sequence: this sequence merges with given one as tooltip, Check the blue page of the main project to see if this sequence is Free for reservation. Please, is the bold wording in the English language correct ?
2022-01-05, 20:29   #1392
EdH

"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009

25·3·47 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by garambois Regarding your remarks on the reservations of merging sequences, I think you are right : we have to be careful and do what is necessary to avoid that several people make the same calculations for the same sequence. Please, in the "Definitions" table on this page (http://www.aliquotes.com/aliquotes_p..._entieres.html), is it a good idea to replace this line : Code: Yellow background of sequence: this sequence merges with given one as tooltip with this one with the part in bold on a orange background ? Code: Yellow background of sequence: this sequence merges with given one as tooltip, Check the blue page of the main project to see if this sequence is Free for reservation. Please, is the bold wording in the English language correct ?
It reads fine, but I would use a period rather than a comma before it.

 2022-01-06, 18:35 #1393 garambois     "Garambois Jean-Luc" Oct 2011 France 809 Posts OK, I will make this change in the next update. Thanks to you for your advice.
 2022-01-08, 08:25 #1394 unconnected     May 2009 Russia, Moscow 2×5×277 Posts 79^99 finally done!
2022-01-08, 11:46   #1395
garambois

"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France

809 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by unconnected 79^99 finally done!
WOW !
OK, a lot of thanks !
This result will appear on the page at the next update.

 2022-01-12, 21:33 #1396 garambois     "Garambois Jean-Luc" Oct 2011 France 80910 Posts I take new base 88.
 2022-01-15, 11:57 #1397 garambois     "Garambois Jean-Luc" Oct 2011 France 32916 Posts I wanted to examine the first terms of the base 800 = 2 * 20^2. And I had a pleasant surprise : all the calculations were done for base 800 up to exponent 58 ! And unless I am mistaken, it is impossible that the calculations of the lower bases have completed the base 800, as for example the calculations of the base 2 can complete the bases 4, 8, 16, 32... So I will add the base 800 to the project page, but I don't know who did the calculations. If the person who made these calculations wants to come forward here for attribution, I can add his name for the base 800 sequences in the next update.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post fivemack FactorDB 46 2021-02-21 10:46 schickel FactorDB 18 2013-06-12 16:09 garambois Aliquot Sequences 34 2012-06-10 21:53 Andi47 FactorDB 21 2011-12-29 21:11 schickel mersennewiki 0 2008-12-30 07:07

All times are UTC. The time now is 19:23.

Fri May 27 19:23:59 UTC 2022 up 43 days, 17:25, 0 users, load averages: 1.46, 1.60, 1.65