![]() |
![]() |
#89 | |
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
37×163 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I have manage to compile on another system avoiding this issue so it is something system dependent. Not a clue what is causing this. Typically for linux copying across the binary wasn't a solution due to dependency issues. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 |
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
212 Posts |
![]()
If I run batch assignments as yafu "factor(@)" -batchfile in.txt it works as expected. But if I want to just run SIQS (which works faster for my current workload), as in yafu "siqs(@)" -batchfile in.txt, the results are output to factor.log but not to factor.json. Is there any reason why it can't output JSON-format results?
I can use factor() and specify -noecm to skip ECM but I'm not sure if there's something equivalent to also entirely skip rho and pm1? Last fiddled with by James Heinrich on 2022-11-27 at 02:57 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#91 |
Sep 2009
2·1,213 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 |
Dec 2020
3716 Posts |
![]()
I got this error when running 2.10 (yafu-x64.exe), which I downloaded today:
Code:
nfs: commencing msieve linear algebra line 80 - The queue is full, unable to add data to it. line 300 - Failed to enqueue a task to free tasks queue. line 305 - The worker thread has exited. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 | |
"Ben"
Feb 2007
72258 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 | |
Dec 2020
1101112 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Code:
Fri Dec 9 18:46:34 2022 commencing relation filtering Fri Dec 9 18:46:34 2022 estimated available RAM is 32272.6 MB Fri Dec 9 18:46:34 2022 commencing duplicate removal, pass 1 Fri Dec 9 18:47:34 2022 found 587238 hash collisions in 5437649 relations Fri Dec 9 18:47:39 2022 added 2048 free relations Fri Dec 9 18:47:39 2022 commencing duplicate removal, pass 2 Fri Dec 9 18:47:43 2022 found 265579 duplicates and 5174118 unique relations Fri Dec 9 18:47:43 2022 memory use: 20.6 MB Fri Dec 9 18:47:43 2022 reading ideals above 100000 Fri Dec 9 18:47:43 2022 commencing singleton removal, initial pass Fri Dec 9 18:48:37 2022 memory use: 172.2 MB Fri Dec 9 18:48:37 2022 reading all ideals from disk Fri Dec 9 18:48:37 2022 memory use: 164.1 MB Fri Dec 9 18:48:37 2022 keeping 5709579 ideals with weight <= 200, target excess is 25131 Fri Dec 9 18:48:38 2022 commencing in-memory singleton removal Fri Dec 9 18:48:38 2022 begin with 5174118 relations and 5709579 unique ideals Fri Dec 9 18:48:40 2022 reduce to 1895015 relations and 1772958 ideals in 18 passes Fri Dec 9 18:48:40 2022 max relations containing the same ideal: 102 Fri Dec 9 18:48:40 2022 removing 363476 relations and 317023 ideals in 46453 cliques Fri Dec 9 18:48:40 2022 commencing in-memory singleton removal Fri Dec 9 18:48:40 2022 begin with 1531539 relations and 1772958 unique ideals Fri Dec 9 18:48:41 2022 reduce to 1471837 relations and 1394129 ideals in 10 passes Fri Dec 9 18:48:41 2022 max relations containing the same ideal: 86 Fri Dec 9 18:48:41 2022 removing 271480 relations and 225027 ideals in 46453 cliques Fri Dec 9 18:48:41 2022 commencing in-memory singleton removal Fri Dec 9 18:48:41 2022 begin with 1200357 relations and 1394129 unique ideals Fri Dec 9 18:48:41 2022 reduce to 1156163 relations and 1123430 ideals in 11 passes Fri Dec 9 18:48:41 2022 max relations containing the same ideal: 73 Fri Dec 9 18:48:42 2022 relations with 0 large ideals: 458 Fri Dec 9 18:48:42 2022 relations with 1 large ideals: 355 Fri Dec 9 18:48:42 2022 relations with 2 large ideals: 4327 Fri Dec 9 18:48:42 2022 relations with 3 large ideals: 31810 Fri Dec 9 18:48:42 2022 relations with 4 large ideals: 126181 Fri Dec 9 18:48:42 2022 relations with 5 large ideals: 290840 Fri Dec 9 18:48:42 2022 relations with 6 large ideals: 350852 Fri Dec 9 18:48:42 2022 relations with 7+ large ideals: 351340 Fri Dec 9 18:48:42 2022 commencing 2-way merge Fri Dec 9 18:48:42 2022 reduce to 651233 relation sets and 618501 unique ideals Fri Dec 9 18:48:42 2022 ignored 1 oversize relation sets Fri Dec 9 18:48:42 2022 commencing full merge Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 memory use: 67.3 MB Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 found 275737 cycles, need 274701 Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 weight of 274701 cycles is about 24729657 (90.02/cycle) Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 distribution of cycle lengths: Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 1 relations: 22179 Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 2 relations: 21955 Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 3 relations: 22082 Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 4 relations: 20644 Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 5 relations: 19845 Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 6 relations: 18403 Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 7 relations: 17222 Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 8 relations: 15920 Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 9 relations: 14254 Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 10+ relations: 102197 Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 heaviest cycle: 28 relations Fri Dec 9 18:48:51 2022 commencing cycle optimization Fri Dec 9 18:48:52 2022 start with 2353338 relations Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 pruned 71576 relations Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 memory use: 69.3 MB Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 distribution of cycle lengths: Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 1 relations: 22179 Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 2 relations: 22426 Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 3 relations: 22811 Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 4 relations: 21281 Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 5 relations: 20510 Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 6 relations: 18946 Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 7 relations: 17606 Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 8 relations: 16137 Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 9 relations: 14547 Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 10+ relations: 98258 Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 heaviest cycle: 28 relations Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 RelProcTime: 142 Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 commencing linear algebra Fri Dec 9 18:48:56 2022 read 274701 cycles Fri Dec 9 18:48:57 2022 cycles contain 1096133 unique relations Fri Dec 9 18:49:08 2022 read 1096133 relations Fri Dec 9 18:49:09 2022 using 20 quadratic characters above 4294917295 Fri Dec 9 18:49:14 2022 building initial matrix Fri Dec 9 18:49:23 2022 memory use: 131.1 MB Fri Dec 9 18:49:23 2022 read 274701 cycles Fri Dec 9 18:49:23 2022 matrix is 274521 x 274701 (100.4 MB) with weight 31358255 (114.15/col) Fri Dec 9 18:49:23 2022 sparse part has weight 23291178 (84.79/col) Fri Dec 9 18:49:25 2022 filtering completed in 2 passes Fri Dec 9 18:49:25 2022 matrix is 274426 x 274606 (100.4 MB) with weight 31353334 (114.18/col) Fri Dec 9 18:49:25 2022 sparse part has weight 23289430 (84.81/col) Fri Dec 9 18:49:26 2022 matrix starts at (0, 0) Fri Dec 9 18:49:26 2022 matrix is 274426 x 274606 (100.4 MB) with weight 31353334 (114.18/col) Fri Dec 9 18:49:26 2022 sparse part has weight 23289430 (84.81/col) Fri Dec 9 18:49:26 2022 saving the first 48 matrix rows for later Fri Dec 9 18:49:26 2022 matrix includes 64 packed rows Fri Dec 9 18:49:26 2022 matrix is 274378 x 274606 (96.7 MB) with weight 25779776 (93.88/col) Fri Dec 9 18:49:26 2022 sparse part has weight 22604273 (82.32/col) Fri Dec 9 18:49:26 2022 using block size 8192 and superblock size 884736 for processor cache size 9216 kB Fri Dec 9 18:49:27 2022 commencing Lanczos iteration (10 threads) Fri Dec 9 18:49:27 2022 memory use: 87.8 MB |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 |
"Daniel Jackson"
May 2011
14285714285714285714
3·251 Posts |
![]()
I'm trying to factor the C98 from 3141592653589^15-1 via SNFS, and I'm getting an "error: number of relsets too large" message. Googling that exact message gives no results whatsoever. How do I get it to finish properly? It would take less time than SIQS would.
Last fiddled with by Stargate38 on 2022-12-22 at 23:03 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#96 | |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
10001100011112 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Code:
? factor(x^15-1) [ x - 1 1] [ x^2 + x + 1 1] [ x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1 1] [x^8 - x^7 + x^5 - x^4 + x^3 - x + 1 1] ? x=3141592653589 3141592653589 ? factor(x-1) [ 2 2] [ 3 1] [ 751 1] [348601049 1] ? factor(x^2+x+1) [ 3 1] [ 44533 1] [ 18504391 1] [3992286879079 1] ? factor(x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1) [ 11 1] [ 377851 1] [ 3781967821 1] [6196813137523011514275172063655641 1] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 |
"Daniel Jackson"
May 2011
14285714285714285714
10111100012 Posts |
![]()
The C98 is (x^8 - x^7 + x^5 - x^4 + x^3 - x + 1)/211. Therefore, factoring the polynomial x^15-1 doesn't give me the factors for the C98. I already divided out the algebraic factors before attempting the factorization.
What do I do to fix the "error: number of relsets too large" error? You didn't answer that part. EDIT2: Why didn't you answer the question I had above (how to fix that error)? If I don't get an answer to it, I might as well just use SIQS for numbers <100 digits, even if SNFS is faster. Please tell me how to fix the "relsets too large" error! Sorry if I sound rude, but I could've factored the C98 (via SIQS) while I was waiting for an answer! There needs to be a table of YAFU 2.10 errors with solutions/workarounds for them, so that people can fix the errors themselves and not have to wait for an answer (unless it's a programming error/code bug). Last fiddled with by Stargate38 on 2022-12-23 at 00:21 Reason: very upset |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 |
"Daniel Jackson"
May 2011
14285714285714285714
3×251 Posts |
![]()
Since I didn't get any answers before the edit deadline, here's the factorization by SIQS (did it after updating the last post):
Code:
***factors found*** P40 = 1209015421263655471681125100451108628871 P59 = 37195010516312948894096273205169700041093822544729092536061 Last fiddled with by Stargate38 on 2022-12-23 at 00:40 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 | |
Apr 2020
929 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Searching for "relsets" on the forum reveals a previous thread where this error was reported. In that case it arose from collecting far more relations than were needed on a very small job, and I expect the same thing happened to you. My guess is that the default YAFU parameters aren't well calibrated for such tiny jobs and too many Q are sieved between filtering runs. Can you post the content of factor.log for the SNFS attempt, if you still have it? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
yafu ignoring yafu.ini | chris2be8 | YAFU | 9 | 2022-02-17 17:52 |
YAFU Version Differences | nivek000 | YAFU | 2 | 2021-12-21 16:21 |
How I install YAFU version 2 onto my Ubuntu Machines | EdH | EdH | 4 | 2021-09-26 22:39 |
Running YAFU via Aliqueit doesn't find yafu.ini | EdH | YAFU | 8 | 2018-03-14 17:22 |
YAFU version 1.31 | bsquared | YAFU | 26 | 2012-04-23 03:16 |