mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-03-27, 15:45   #3565
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

52·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
The lone last DC assignment before the 60M DC milestone is reached was reassigned to an account that has made zero progress so far, with a projection of expiration before completion (8 d vs 10). https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...9917901&full=1
https://www.mersenne.org/assignments...rst=1&excert=1
A RadeonVII could complete it in several hours.
Let the user finish another exponent first.
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-03-27, 16:47   #3566
slandrum
 
Jan 2021
California

23·5·11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
The lone last DC assignment before the 60M DC milestone is reached was reassigned to an account that has made zero progress so far, with a projection of expiration before completion (8 d vs 10). https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...9917901&full=1
https://www.mersenne.org/assignments...rst=1&excert=1
A RadeonVII could complete it in several hours.
I would let it expire out and get reassigned. 60M is a "big" milestone, but not that big or urgent. There's also been pointless poaching going on in DC that's just ending up in wasted resources.

Last fiddled with by slandrum on 2022-03-27 at 16:49
slandrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-03-27, 17:14   #3567
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

2×32×7×53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S485122 View Post
Let the user finish another exponent first.
Right. IF it landed on an mprime/prime95 instance with the default 3 day work queue setting still in place, it should begin making progress in another day or so. Once it subsequently reports some progress in, within a day after that, it will get an extension of expiration, from 10 days since assignment, to 30 days, as a Cat 0 DC assignment. Perhaps this fourth LLDC attempt will finish before assignment expiration. (At ~17 months since first DC was assigned. Then we'll see whether the res64s match or ~4% probability an LLTC is needed, with more possible delay.)
I've set most of my DC engines to 1 day queue and DC with PRP/proof instead of LLDC, to reduce those effects. In prime.txt:
Code:
DaysOfWork=1
WorkPreference=155
PRP/proof is quicker and more efficient and more reliable, than LL DC with the combined error rate of ~2% first LL and ~2% LLDC resulting in ~4% probability of LLTC possible tiebreaker and occasional LLQC etc. if staying with the LL route. Effort to verify a composite by LL is ~1.041 tests, vs 1.005 with PRP/proof8. Assuming the current LLDC is with Jacobi check, its likely error rate halves, but the LL first test was done before Jacobi check was added, so that remains.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-03-27 at 17:30
kriesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-04-05, 08:38   #3568
congsz
 
"Cong Shengzhuo"
Sep 2021
Nanjing, China

1910 Posts
Default

All tests below 60M verified. (but in UTC 08:39 Apr. 5 2022 the mersenne.org milestone page has not been updated yet)

Last fiddled with by congsz on 2022-04-05 at 08:41
congsz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-04-05, 13:40   #3569
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

2·5,323 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by congsz View Post
All tests below 60M verified. (but in UTC 08:39 Apr. 5 2022 the mersenne.org milestone page has not been updated yet)
That has some human in the loop involvement. It will be updated soon enough.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-04-23, 07:18   #3570
tuckerkao
 
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123

10111100002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhangrc View Post
Seems that they are getting PRP without any P-1.

Code:
v308	108356371	F-PM1	2022-03-23 02:25	8.5	Factor: 996452764760981189944109089 / (P-1, B1=471000, B2=41197002)	18.0118
v308	108327223	F-PM1	2022-03-21 03:26	6.5	Factor: 2101743747139768387760441 / (P-1, B1=439000)	2.6107
v308	108320761	F-PM1	2022-03-17 09:51	2.8	Factor: 60009555748293413447823073 / (P-1, B1=463000, B2=40465194)	17.6942
3 factors were found in about 50 trials.
And the factor of 108327223 is smooth enough that could be found by bounds as low as B1=50000, B2=100000.
The only possible explanation is that they had no prior P-1 done.
M108356371 was a strong example why P-1 should be finished before additional trial factoring efforts were added on. I only ran TF from 276 to 277 because it was your assignment that you wanted me to finish during Dec 2021.

M108355781, M108355913, M108356797, M108357871 also.

I always do this way in the free upper areas -> NF-PM1 on M120202123 <- P-1 before the final recommended bit of GPU72, or F-PM1 on M115173323.

Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 2022-04-23 at 07:34
tuckerkao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-24, 21:51   #3571
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

2·5,323 Posts
Default

This graph shows the gap (in days) between the current DC milestone and when the FTC milestone was the same or lower. I don't know when the last time the minimum GHz-days output for a machine to get FTC's was moved up. It might be time.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Time Gap.png
Views:	45
Size:	223.5 KB
ID:	26920  
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-24, 23:13   #3572
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

54358 Posts
Default

Seem accurate.
I recently had 3 DC of M64 xxx xxx which were first tested in 2014.
And a PRP that will end on the first of june. maybe the PRP will reduce the time gap in what? 4 or 5 year?
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-24, 23:24   #3573
slandrum
 
Jan 2021
California

23×5×11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
This graph shows the gap (in days) between the current DC milestone and when the FTC milestone was the same or lower. I don't know when the last time the minimum GHz-days output for a machine to get FTC's was moved up. It might be time.
I believe it was moved up within the last year. I know that the requirements listed on https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/ changed within the last year.
slandrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-24, 23:31   #3574
slandrum
 
Jan 2021
California

23×5×11 Posts
Default

I've noticed that my resources that are set on "Do what makes the most sense" recently have been getting more FTC assignments and fewer DC assignments. This may be the server responding to the massive drop in the amount of FTC work that's being done over what was going on a few months ago.
slandrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-05-25, 16:17   #3575
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

2·32·7·53 Posts
Default One to go to 109M

ETA 5 days on M108938483 (James Carlson)
kriesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newer X64 build needed Googulator Msieve 75 2022-06-13 14:22
Performance of cuda-ecm on newer hardware? fivemack GMP-ECM 14 2015-02-12 20:10
Cause this don't belong in the milestone thread bcp19 Data 30 2012-09-08 15:09
Newer msieves are slow on Core i7 mklasson Msieve 9 2009-02-18 12:58
Use of large memory pages possible with newer linux kernels Dresdenboy Software 3 2003-12-08 14:47

All times are UTC. The time now is 11:03.


Fri Aug 19 11:03:31 UTC 2022 up 1 day, 8:32, 0 users, load averages: 0.84, 1.05, 1.11

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔