![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Is MM127 Prime? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 19.75% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
43 | 53.09% |
Really Don't Know |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 27.16% |
Voters: 81. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
23D916 Posts |
![]()
Someone please find a factor for this number.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"Phil"
Sep 2002
Tracktown, U.S.A.
2·13·43 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
5×701 Posts |
![]()
I'd be happy to run a few curves on this number. Maybe someone would be willing to email me the decimal expansion? Then I could work on my Prime95 skills a little bit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Jun 2003
1,579 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Good luck ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
2·7·827 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Just to keep people's expectations reasonable, I estimate the odds of this number having a factor that a decent-sized distributed search (say on the order of a couple hundred CPUs) could find in the next couple of years at roughly 10%. But what a coup it would be to find one... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Jun 2003
The Computer
18416 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
217318 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
![]()
Such a poll is ridiculous. We have no basis, other than the
prime number theorem on which to make an assessment. For M < x < (1 + epsilon)M, x chosen uniformly at random, the probability that x is prime is 1/log M. For MM127, the "probability" that it is prime (assuming that it just another random integer selected from other integers near the same size) is 1/( M127 * log(2)). This is small indeed. Unless we are VERY lucky and find a small factor, the true answer is computationally out of reach. I don't regard the question as interesting. We already know that that MMp isn't always prime. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
217318 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Bamboozled!
"𒉺𒌌𒇷𒆷𒀭"
May 2003
Down not across
28·41 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Seems to be no more ridiculous than the interminable discussion about some cultural activity called "march madness". At least I can follow what's going on here. To be fair, the other thread isn't in the Math subforum. Paul |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Official 'exchange of inanities' thread [Was: mm127 is prime, cuz I say so] | kalikidoom | Puzzles | 58 | 2015-10-17 16:18 |
MM127 | Stan | Miscellaneous Math | 34 | 2015-06-19 03:24 |
Is MM127 a PRP? | aketilander | Operazione Doppi Mersennes | 6 | 2012-10-31 16:02 |
MM127 | Dougal | LMH > 100M | 26 | 2009-12-13 09:57 |
Poll for new conjectures prime search effort | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 14 | 2007-12-22 07:13 |