541456 and 51456. I checked 20 numbers 2000 times and found 200 patterns!!

[Batalov]

That's it, that's it, let it out. You will feel better.

Scream on top of you lungs, like a spoiled child that you are.

[science_man_88]

Originally Posted by enzocreti

WHO ARE YOU?

They are someone who wouldn't chalk up a number of coincidences (meaning two things happen together not necessarily connected in cause) and who has more than 21 times the posts and probably more than that (okay 166 months versus 9, aka about 18.5 times as much) in time spent on this forum obeying the logical rules.

[enzocreti]

Originally Posted by science_man_88

They are someone who wouldn't chalk up a number of coincidences (meaning two things happen together not necessarily connected in cause) and who has more than 21 times the posts and probably more than that (okay 166 months versus 9, aka about 18.5 times as much) in time spent on this forum obeying the logical rules.

This is far more than the number of multiples expected by chance.

This is the answer of GreatHouse…

[enzocreti]

All coincidences ok...

[science_man_88]

Originally Posted by enzocreti

This is the answer of GreatHouse…

He did the work, not you. Do the work and prove something, and then you at least have a chance at being accepted.

[enzocreti]

Originally Posted by science_man_88

He did the work, not you. Do the work and prove something, and then you at least have a chance at being accepted.

Before GreatHouse, I noticed that things on mathoverflow...
I doubt they are all coincidences

[science_man_88]

Originally Posted by enzocreti

Before GreatHouse, I noticed that things on mathoverflow...
I doubt they are all coincidences

doubt is one thing, Proof is entirely different.

[enzocreti]

I think it doesn't take a genius to see that this is far more than the number of multiples expected by chance. Proofing something is completely out of reach for me. I just noticed that the exponents leading to a probable prime are not random at all.

[science_man_88]

Originally Posted by enzocreti

I think it doesn't take a genius to see that this is far more than the number of multiples expected by chance. Proofing something is completely out of reach for me.

Proving something doesn't always take genius either. here's a relevant proof on a superset of these numbers for example:

Let a=(2n+1,n) be the natural number formed when concatenating 2n+1 and n, both natual numbers together, it follows that a= (2n+1)*10^d + n , where d is the number of decimal digits in n .

Regrouping we get (2n*10^d+n)+10^d the first group of which is a multiple of any divisor of n . Therefore, we can conclude that any gcd(n,a) also divides 10^d which only has prime factors 2 and 5.
This then implies that if 2 and 5 don't divide into n then they can't divide into the value a either.

[VBCurtis]

Originally Posted by enzocreti

I think it doesn't take a genius to see that this is far more than the number of multiples expected by chance. Proofing something is completely out of reach for me. I just noticed that the exponents leading to a probable prime are not random at all.

You could try learning the meaning of the words you use. Tell us what you think "not random at all" means. The first step toward "proof" is using words in the way mathematics uses them.

You don't even know if Dr Greathouse was being sarcastic when you quote him!

You don't know how common these occurences should be, if "random" did describe the processes. How about you try to figure out how often these things would happen if they *were* random? You can't define "not random", because you don't even know what "random" looks like. Discovering arbitrary numerological trivia about numbers of no specific import can be done with any list of numbers; so what? Stop hand-waving about "not a coincidence" until you figure out what "coincidence" would look like.

Better, read the entire wiki about Poisson probability distribution. There lies the first step toward a grasp of "random", so you might quit your "THIS MEANS SOMETHING!" crap.

[Uncwilly]

Originally Posted by enzocreti

WHO ARE YOU?

Well if you spent maybe five minute with your favourite search engine you could find out . I found out where they work, work email address, performance reviews, hobby/side gig, and marital status. And I found info about their salary.

Do your own homework.