![]() |
![]() |
#2696 |
"Yves"
Jul 2017
Belgium
3·17 Posts |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2697 |
Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.
17128 Posts |
![]()
OK, so our next BIG milestone is the first time checking of the mersenne prime of exponent 74,207,281
There are 39 exponents left to get there but one of them 74101927 is suppossed to take ~28 months to complete! There must be a serious glitch in the program that estimates the completion which is supposed to end on 2019-12-21, because even a simple "rule of three" suggests around 10 months (293 days). Of course, it will expire in 21 days and let's hope it is given to ATH ![]() Last fiddled with by rudy235 on 2017-09-05 at 19:46 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2698 | |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
72×67 Posts |
![]() Quote:
These in particular are estimating to take a REALLY long time: 74181521 74051921 74055439 74097707 74101927 74202361 That last one ... based on it's past 47 data points of check-ins, I'm showing it's actual days-to-complete as 2800 days. It's moved an awesome 0.0348% per day since it first checked in with any progress. 74181521 is estimating 1210 days, the rest are 220-550 days, somewhere in that big range. They'll all expire in due course. The one you mentioned, 74101927, I'm estimating 213 days to go with an average 0.3581% per day, with 55 data points. The fact that the client is now reporting a much longer ETA means it's probably slowed down even more than that. I could check, but I'm too lazy right now. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2699 |
Sep 2003
A1716 Posts |
![]()
When the milestone of 42M is reached in a few months, this will simultaneously result in the double-checking of all remaining exponents whose first time test was in 2007. All exponents from earlier years have already been double-checked, as well as all of the very early exponents with no timestamp.
Currently there are maybe four 2007-era exponents in the 41.1M range, three of which will complete the double-check in a few days, and one that is assigned but hasn't started yet (41156153); and there is also the exponent 41979199 which is moving along slowly and will probably expire before the current assignee finishes it. Last fiddled with by GP2 on 2017-09-06 at 04:33 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2700 |
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
11×13×71 Posts |
![]()
If it matches, 41719147 will complete in 21.5 hours.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2701 | |
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
600310 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Last fiddled with by retina on 2017-09-06 at 09:24 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2702 | |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
72×67 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Code:
exponent Date 41979199 2007-07-04 41386967 2007-12-31 41404529 2007-12-31 41188673 2007-12-31 41166991 2007-12-31 41156153 2007-12-31 41184851 2007-12-31 41439883 2007-12-31 Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2017-09-06 at 22:23 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2703 | |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
72×67 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() Okay, I made those consistent ... sorry, but I think a new prime discovery deserves at least one exclamation point (but only one). I also removed the extraneous "is" from the earlier primes (they didn't show up in the later listings). Changes on the "mock" page for now and I'll probably just roll those out when the next milestone gets checked off the list. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2704 |
Sep 2003
32×7×41 Posts |
![]()
Since we're quibbling about punctuation...
Code:
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 74 million Makes it a little less ambiguous. Otherwise, a reporter or other non-participant visiting this page might wonder what "time checking" is. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2705 |
Aug 2012
Mass., USA
13E16 Posts |
![]()
The number of users with more than 100,000 GHz days credit is now too gross.
Edit: I meant two gross. ![]() Last fiddled with by cuBerBruce on 2017-09-07 at 04:14 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2706 |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
72×67 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newer X64 build needed | Googulator | Msieve | 73 | 2020-08-30 07:47 |
Performance of cuda-ecm on newer hardware? | fivemack | GMP-ECM | 14 | 2015-02-12 20:10 |
Cause this don't belong in the milestone thread | bcp19 | Data | 30 | 2012-09-08 15:09 |
Newer msieves are slow on Core i7 | mklasson | Msieve | 9 | 2009-02-18 12:58 |
Use of large memory pages possible with newer linux kernels | Dresdenboy | Software | 3 | 2003-12-08 14:47 |