mersenneforum.org > Data Strategic Double Clicking
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2017-06-19, 16:57   #1497
storm5510
Random Account

Aug 2009
U.S.A.

2·3·7·43 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Yeah, I did a spot check of another one but it matched, so maybe I just hit a few bad ones as a result of my triple-checking. I may check it out again or just do another roundup of "maybe bad, but let's test one more and see" kind of work.
I hope to have my new rig up and running sometime late tomorrow afternoon. If so, I'll pluck one from the shorter list just above and give it a go. I would like to be able to do DC's in the 70 hour range with exponents of this magnitude.

 2017-06-22, 01:50 #1498 nofaith628     Feb 2017 2×17 Posts Finished 40 previously queued exponents in the 50M~55M region. Checking the results once every few days I estimated 40% are mismatches. Hoping Madpoo can pick those triple checks up. Also queued up all available exponents under 70M. Last fiddled with by nofaith628 on 2017-06-22 at 01:51
2017-06-22, 04:01   #1499
Mark Rose

"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

B7116 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by nofaith628 Finished 40 previously queued exponents in the 50M~55M region. Checking the results once every few days I estimated 40% are mismatches. Hoping Madpoo can pick those triple checks up. Also queued up all available exponents under 70M.
You missed these 64:

DoubleCheck=54441767,73,1
DoubleCheck=54872291,73,1
DoubleCheck=55006123,73,1
DoubleCheck=55061443,73,1
DoubleCheck=55061557,73,1
DoubleCheck=55100737,73,1
DoubleCheck=55297247,73,1
DoubleCheck=55298843,73,1
DoubleCheck=55329581,73,1
DoubleCheck=55398199,73,1
DoubleCheck=55449209,73,1
DoubleCheck=55684813,73,1
DoubleCheck=55735451,73,1
DoubleCheck=55816259,73,1
DoubleCheck=55894973,73,1
DoubleCheck=55956871,73,1
DoubleCheck=55983827,73,1
DoubleCheck=56004757,73,1
DoubleCheck=56041319,73,1
DoubleCheck=56088629,73,1
DoubleCheck=56133191,73,1
DoubleCheck=56566841,73,1
DoubleCheck=56604923,73,1
DoubleCheck=56625053,74,1
DoubleCheck=56644061,73,1
DoubleCheck=56717519,73,1
DoubleCheck=56736437,73,1
DoubleCheck=56759347,73,1
DoubleCheck=56965847,73,1
DoubleCheck=57091651,73,1
DoubleCheck=57120929,73,1
DoubleCheck=57143657,73,1
DoubleCheck=57215933,73,1
DoubleCheck=57238343,73,1
DoubleCheck=57255067,73,1
DoubleCheck=57374939,73,1
DoubleCheck=57404041,73,1
DoubleCheck=57423991,73,1
DoubleCheck=57435919,73,1
DoubleCheck=57511813,73,1
DoubleCheck=57577297,73,1
DoubleCheck=58827649,74,1
DoubleCheck=58828267,74,1
DoubleCheck=59001001,74,1
DoubleCheck=59083699,74,1
DoubleCheck=59279057,73,1
DoubleCheck=59332439,73,1
DoubleCheck=59350231,73,1
DoubleCheck=59378471,73,1
DoubleCheck=59441087,73,1
DoubleCheck=59485343,75,1
DoubleCheck=59574169,73,1
DoubleCheck=59593223,73,1
DoubleCheck=59599873,73,1
DoubleCheck=59616719,74,1
DoubleCheck=59616919,73,1
DoubleCheck=59626481,73,1
DoubleCheck=59644603,73,1
DoubleCheck=59695201,73,1
DoubleCheck=59703341,73,1
DoubleCheck=59734183,73,1
DoubleCheck=59746667,73,1
DoubleCheck=59844329,73,1
DoubleCheck=59994863,73,1

And there's one remaining higher exponent:

DoubleCheck=72629587,75,1

 2017-06-22, 07:01 #1500 nofaith628     Feb 2017 428 Posts That is a big list. Must've missed it in the previous posts. Wish there was an easier method for us users to obtain these double checks. Queued these up and it should be busy for the next month or two. Last fiddled with by nofaith628 on 2017-06-22 at 07:29
2017-06-22, 15:13   #1501
Mark Rose

"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

292910 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by nofaith628 Wish there was an easier method for us users to obtain these double checks.
Agreed. It would be so easy to add a database column to the exponents table to be manually marked by MadPoo. Then add a new work type for SDC. Restrict SDC work to Cat 0/1/2 DC elligible machines, and prevent SDC exponents from being returned as DC assignments (to stop unproven/slow machines from sitting on them). If there are no SDC exponents available for a machine, send DC work.

Last fiddled with by Mark Rose on 2017-06-22 at 15:13

2017-06-22, 16:02   #1502
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

2×4,703 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose It would be so easy to add a database column to the exponents table to be manually marked by MadPoo.
It could also be a separate table "JOIN"'ed into the query. And MadPoo's heuristics could be codified.

2017-06-22, 17:47   #1503
ATH
Einyen

Dec 2003
Denmark

BC716 Posts

I suggest worktype 42 not listed anywhere but in this thread

Quote:
 0 - Whatever makes the most sense 1 - Trial factoring to low limits 2 - Trial factoring 4 - P-1 factoring 5 - ECM on small Mersenne numbers 6 - ECM on Fermat numbers 42 - Strategic Double Checking 100 - First time primality tests 101 - Double-checking 102 - World record primality tests 104 - 100 million digit primality tests

2017-06-24, 07:58   #1504
storm5510
Random Account

Aug 2009
U.S.A.

2·3·7·43 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose Agreed...Then add a new work type for SDC. Restrict SDC work to Cat 0/1/2 DC elligible machines....
Can you elaborate on what "Cat 0/1/2" is?

2017-06-24, 10:08   #1505
sdbardwick

Aug 2002
North San Diego County

2·11·31 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by storm5510 Can you elaborate on what "Cat 0/1/2" is?
CATegory as explained here: https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/

 2017-06-25, 16:26 #1506 Madpoo Serpentine Vermin Jar     Jul 2014 2·5·7·47 Posts Here's a list of exponents from two different CPUs that might be bad, might be good... they currently have bad > good but they also have a bunch of unknowns. These are the smallest exponents for each month of their history to try and get more data (one of them is the same I mentioned before... I think one more bad one came in since then, I forget). Anyway, it's speculative... they may have had a few bad months, but only one way to know. Code: Exponent Bad Good Unk worktodo 51954559 1 1 14 DoubleCheck=51954559,73,1 54274777 1 3 10 DoubleCheck=54274777,73,1 57436123 0 0 6 DoubleCheck=57436123,73,1 58214027 0 1 8 DoubleCheck=58214027,73,1 58409573 1 1 8 DoubleCheck=58409573,73,1 58892083 3 4 4 DoubleCheck=58892083,73,1 60006059 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=60006059,74,1 60464567 0 1 8 DoubleCheck=60464567,74,1 68017879 0 0 5 DoubleCheck=68017879,74,1 68024321 0 0 6 DoubleCheck=68024321,74,1 68054159 0 0 9 DoubleCheck=68054159,74,1 68831353 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=68831353,74,1 69513853 8 5 3 DoubleCheck=69513853,74,1 69803893 1 0 16 DoubleCheck=69803893,74,1 69804299 0 0 17 DoubleCheck=69804299,74,1 69804797 0 0 15 DoubleCheck=69804797,74,1 72435029 0 0 17 DoubleCheck=72435029,75,1 72436307 0 0 11 DoubleCheck=72436307,75,1 72436549 0 0 17 DoubleCheck=72436549,75,1 74417641 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=74417641,75,1 74417689 0 0 8 DoubleCheck=74417689,75,1 74760641 0 0 4 DoubleCheck=74760641,75,1 74761439 0 0 5 DoubleCheck=74761439,75,1 74762833 0 0 4 DoubleCheck=74762833,75,1 75002269 0 0 15 DoubleCheck=75002269,75,1 75003743 0 0 10 DoubleCheck=75003743,75,1 76079023 0 0 20 DoubleCheck=76079023,75,1 76081543 0 0 14 DoubleCheck=76081543,75,1 76083373 0 0 13 DoubleCheck=76083373,75,1 77075717 0 0 11 DoubleCheck=77075717,75,1 77075851 0 0 9 DoubleCheck=77075851,75,1 77076313 0 0 7 DoubleCheck=77076313,75,1 77076631 0 0 5 DoubleCheck=77076631,75,1 77076719 0 0 6 DoubleCheck=77076719,75,1 77498219 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=77498219,75,1 77498567 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=77498567,75,1 78990157 0 0 11 DoubleCheck=78990157,75,1 78990361 0 0 12 DoubleCheck=78990361,75,1
2017-06-26, 06:37   #1507
storm5510
Random Account

Aug 2009
U.S.A.

2×3×7×43 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Here's a list of exponents from two different CPUs that might be bad, might be good... they currently have bad > good but they also have a bunch of unknowns. These are the smallest exponents for each month of their history to try and get more data (one of them is the same I mentioned before... I think one more bad one came in since then, I forget). Anyway, it's speculative... they may have had a few bad months, but only one way to know. Code: Exponent Bad Good Unk worktodo 51954559 1 1 14 DoubleCheck=51954559,73,1 54274777 1 3 10 DoubleCheck=54274777,73,1 57436123 0 0 6 DoubleCheck=57436123,73,1 58214027 0 1 8 DoubleCheck=58214027,73,1 58409573 1 1 8 DoubleCheck=58409573,73,1 58892083 3 4 4 DoubleCheck=58892083,73,1 60006059 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=60006059,74,1 60464567 0 1 8 DoubleCheck=60464567,74,1 68017879 0 0 5 DoubleCheck=68017879,74,1 68024321 0 0 6 DoubleCheck=68024321,74,1 68054159 0 0 9 DoubleCheck=68054159,74,1 68831353 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=68831353,74,1 69513853 8 5 3 DoubleCheck=69513853,74,1 69803893 1 0 16 DoubleCheck=69803893,74,1 69804299 0 0 17 DoubleCheck=69804299,74,1 69804797 0 0 15 DoubleCheck=69804797,74,1 72435029 0 0 17 DoubleCheck=72435029,75,1 72436307 0 0 11 DoubleCheck=72436307,75,1 72436549 0 0 17 DoubleCheck=72436549,75,1 74417641 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=74417641,75,1 74417689 0 0 8 DoubleCheck=74417689,75,1 74760641 0 0 4 DoubleCheck=74760641,75,1 74761439 0 0 5 DoubleCheck=74761439,75,1 74762833 0 0 4 DoubleCheck=74762833,75,1 75002269 0 0 15 DoubleCheck=75002269,75,1 75003743 0 0 10 DoubleCheck=75003743,75,1 76079023 0 0 20 DoubleCheck=76079023,75,1 76081543 0 0 14 DoubleCheck=76081543,75,1 76083373 0 0 13 DoubleCheck=76083373,75,1 77075717 0 0 11 DoubleCheck=77075717,75,1 77075851 0 0 9 DoubleCheck=77075851,75,1 77076313 0 0 7 DoubleCheck=77076313,75,1 77076631 0 0 5 DoubleCheck=77076631,75,1 77076719 0 0 6 DoubleCheck=77076719,75,1 77498219 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=77498219,75,1 77498567 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=77498567,75,1 78990157 0 0 11 DoubleCheck=78990157,75,1 78990361 0 0 12 DoubleCheck=78990361,75,1
I'll take the top two and add them to my queue in Prime95.

Done: I should have results on the first this coming Saturday; the second on July 4.

Last fiddled with by storm5510 on 2017-06-26 at 06:42

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mysticial Software 50 2017-10-30 19:16 marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56 jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01 Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 05:22.

Tue Jan 26 05:22:31 UTC 2021 up 54 days, 1:33, 0 users, load averages: 2.19, 2.66, 2.53