![]() |
![]() |
#441 |
Oct 2010
191 Posts |
![]()
Can you try
Code:
LD_RUN_PATH=/usr/local/lib make Code:
ldd aliqueit Code:
# # aliqueit Makefile for linux # # you'll need to change this if your gmp headers aren't installed globally: GMP_DIR = /usr/local/include CC = g++ CFLAGS = -O3 -I$(GMP_DIR) # you'll need to change this if your gmp headers aren't installed globally: LIBS = -L/usr/local/lib -lgmp OBJ = aliqueit.o cfg.o misc.o aliqueit: $(OBJ) $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LIBS) $(OBJ) -o aliqueit %.o: %.cc $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $< Code:
ralf@quadriga:~/Quellen.tmp/aliqueit112/src/aliqueit$ ldd aliqueit linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff00167000) libgmp.so.10 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgmp.so.10 (0x00007f444bb9a000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f444b893000) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f444b610000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f444b3fa000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f444b073000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f444be1e000) "make"ing with LD_RUN_PATH results in this: Code:
ralf@quadriga:~/Quellen.tmp/aliqueit112/src/aliqueit$ ldd aliqueit linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff933ff000) libgmp.so.10 => /usr/local/lib/libgmp.so.10 (0x00007f87f72d8000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f87f6fbe000) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f87f6d3b000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f87f6b25000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f87f679e000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f87f7546000) Code:
ldconfig Last fiddled with by Ralf Recker on 2012-09-30 at 19:20 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#442 | |
Mar 2010
5×11 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#443 | |
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
11100001101012 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#444 | |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
3,539 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() I didn't change /etc/ld.so.conf or /etc/ld.so.conf.d, because they looked OK: /etc/ld.so.conf: Code:
include /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf Code:
math11@math11:/etc/ld.so.conf.d$ ls i686-linux-gnu.conf libc.conf~ x86_64-linux-gnu_GL.conf libc.conf x86_64-linux-gnu.conf zz_i386-biarch-compat.conf Code:
# libc default configuration /usr/local/lib Code:
math11@math11:~/Math/Aliqueit/src/aliqueit$ whereis libgmp.so.10 libgmp.so: /usr/local/lib/libgmp.so.10 /usr/local/lib/libgmp.so math11@math11:~/Math/Aliqueit/src/aliqueit$ whereis libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so: math11@math11:~/Math/Aliqueit/src/aliqueit$ whereis libmso.6 libmso: math11@math11:~/Math/Aliqueit/src/aliqueit$ whereis libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so: math11@math11:~/Math/Aliqueit/src/aliqueit$ whereis libc.so.6 libc.so: Off to look for these libraries... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#445 | |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
3,539 Posts |
![]() Quote:
But, that begs the question: Should the libgmp libraries not be displayed by "whereis?" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#446 |
Oct 2010
191 Posts |
![]()
I've set up a Precise Pangolin VM and see the same error.
Last fiddled with by Ralf Recker on 2012-10-01 at 16:21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#447 |
Oct 2010
191 Posts |
![]()
I guess I've found it:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1...e-with-g-4-6-3 Change this entry in Makefile: Code:
aliqueit: $(OBJ) $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LIBS) $(OBJ) -o aliqueit Code:
aliqueit: $(OBJ) $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(OBJ) -o aliqueit $(LIBS) Code:
aliqueit: $(OBJ) $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(OBJ) $(LIBS) -o aliqueit Last fiddled with by Ralf Recker on 2012-10-01 at 17:24 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#448 | |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
3,539 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I (seem to**) have a fully working version of all the packages now and have rewritten my Steps page appropriately. Thanks again to all who have assisted me in this "adventure." **Only minimal testing has been done so far. I'll be testing more "vigorously" over the next few days/weeks/etc. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#449 | |
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3×29×83 Posts |
![]() Quote:
This is my first attempt to use aliqueit on a new Linux install, and now I'm seeing exactly this problem. Code:
Sending 102 lines... --2013-02-23 19:58:28-- http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?report=true Resolving factorization.ath.cx (factorization.ath.cx)... 176.9.39.214 Connecting to factorization.ath.cx (factorization.ath.cx)|176.9.39.214|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 2015 (2.0K) [text/html] Saving to: `aliqueit_tmp_wget_7920' 100%[===================================================================================>] 2,015 --.-K/s in 0s 2013-02-23 19:58:30 (77.4 MB/s) - `aliqueit_tmp_wget_7920' saved [2015/2015] Could it be a too-new version of wget or something? I haven't looked through the aliqueit source yet... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#450 |
Feb 2004
2·3·43 Posts |
![]()
I don't know about linux, but the latest windows wget version (1.11.4) seems to work fine at least. Though that one's more than 4 years old...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#451 |
Mar 2006
Germany
1011001100102 Posts |
![]()
After a long time I used aliqueit.exe again doing a random 105-digit number which seems a member of an aliquot-sequence.
In the beginning of FactorDB every member of an aliqout-seq got the startingnumber as info. My problem: if the number like above got a downdriver, aliqueit reports the number determined is smaller then the starting one and quits. Can this be suppressed and aliqueit goes further the seq down? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Resuming aliqueit | johnadam74 | Aliquot Sequences | 4 | 2016-03-28 12:32 |
Apparent aliqueit issue with specifying factors | pakaran | Aliquot Sequences | 2 | 2015-09-12 23:10 |
Using Several Instances of Aliqueit for a large gnfs job | EdH | Aliquot Sequences | 6 | 2011-12-13 18:58 |
Setting up aliqueit | science_man_88 | Aliquot Sequences | 185 | 2011-11-08 12:18 |
Tried out aliqueit.exe: ggnfs failing | Greebley | Aliquot Sequences | 35 | 2010-02-13 15:23 |