mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Conjectures 'R Us

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-10-07, 10:10   #727
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

5·7·199 Posts
Default

I am sieving all unsieved conjectures at n=10k to 1e11. I might take them to 1e12.
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-12, 17:04   #728
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

5·7·199 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue View Post
I am sieving all unsieved conjectures at n=10k to 1e11. I might take them to 1e12.
I should be able to finish all 39 conjectures at n=10k that are sieved < 1e12 to 1e12 by January. I have 3 GPUs happily sieving away at them.
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-19, 15:04   #729
wombatman
I moo ablest echo power!
 
wombatman's Avatar
 
May 2013

185210 Posts
Default

Sieving S63 from n=25k-50k for all remaining k-values. Needs to get to ~30 secs/factor.
wombatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-19, 16:13   #730
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

5×7×199 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wombatman View Post
Sieving S63 from n=25k-50k for all remaining k-values. Needs to get to ~30 secs/factor.
With which program? This is a big task.
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-19, 17:09   #731
wombatman
I moo ablest echo power!
 
wombatman's Avatar
 
May 2013

34748 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue View Post
With which program? This is a big task.
srsieve2cl. Currently approaching P=1e10 in the next day or two.
wombatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-19, 19:28   #732
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

5×7×199 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wombatman View Post
srsieve2cl. Currently approaching P=1e10 in the next day or two.
Nice. What command line oparameters are you using?
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-19, 20:18   #733
wombatman
I moo ablest echo power!
 
wombatman's Avatar
 
May 2013

22·463 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue View Post
Nice. What command line oparameters are you using?
It took a little trial-and-error (and is likely not optimized), but I'm currently running with -g16 -K8 -M500. I think the -M option is only necessary because I'm starting at such a low p-value. I may try a smaller value with -K as well.

Currently, those options give me throughput of ~2.5k-2.8k p/sec (depending on if something else is using the GPU) at p=500e6 with a found factor rate of ~180/sec. CPU was giving around 200 p/sec for comparison.
wombatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-19, 21:06   #734
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

5·7·199 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wombatman View Post
It took a little trial-and-error (and is likely not optimized), but I'm currently running with -g16 -K8 -M500. I think the -M option is only necessary because I'm starting at such a low p-value. I may try a smaller value with -K as well.

Currently, those options give me throughput of ~2.5k-2.8k p/sec (depending on if something else is using the GPU) at p=500e6 with a found factor rate of ~180/sec. CPU was giving around 200 p/sec for comparison.
I posted srsieve2cl at sourceforge. Take a look at the -b parameter, which is new. By using -b you might be able to reduce -K, which can in turn increase throughput for the GPU. Removing terms will not allow you to adjust -K, only removing sequences.

Last fiddled with by rogue on 2022-10-19 at 21:06
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-10-20, 01:46   #735
wombatman
I moo ablest echo power!
 
wombatman's Avatar
 
May 2013

22·463 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue View Post
I posted srsieve2cl at sourceforge. Take a look at the -b parameter, which is new. By using -b you might be able to reduce -K, which can in turn increase throughput for the GPU. Removing terms will not allow you to adjust -K, only removing sequences.
Will do. Thanks!
wombatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-03, 09:02   #736
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS

52·11·43 Posts
Default

All remaining bases with < 20 k's remaining at a search depth of n=100K have now been fully sieved by Yoyo to P=1e15.

We are currently working on sieving the remaining bases with 3 k's remaining at a search depth of n<500K. Most already have sieve files but there are a few without them.
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-07, 23:15   #737
sweety439
 
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36

2·7·263 Posts
Default

Can you link this page in the 1st post in this thread?
sweety439 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sieving Drive all base 2/4 k's worked by CRUS gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 143 2014-10-21 23:55
Some CRUS stats vmod Conjectures 'R Us 213 2014-02-28 21:23
What are your CRUS plans? rogue Conjectures 'R Us 35 2013-11-09 09:03
CRUS-like sieving challenge CRGreathouse Puzzles 24 2011-10-28 18:30
how high will CRUS go TimSorbet Conjectures 'R Us 1 2010-11-08 20:50

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:12.


Sat Feb 4 08:12:05 UTC 2023 up 170 days, 5:40, 1 user, load averages: 0.73, 1.13, 1.00

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔