20220502, 23:15  #1 
Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.
2^{4}×71 Posts 
ONCE AGAIN: a seemingly fresh proof of the Twin Prime Conjecture.... NOT
A am not qualified to peer review the following article that I just read in Academia.edu.
I am convinced (but not even close to proving it) that there are indeed infinite pairs of Twin Primes. OTOH I don’t believe it is going to be simple or straightforward finding a proof. Based on that ONLY I am skeptical of the proof on the following article. Can anyone here try to see if it has any validity? www.academia.edu/13371440/PROOF_OF_TWIN_PRIMES_CONJECTURE Last fiddled with by retina on 20220502 at 23:18 Reason: Sanitise URL 
20220503, 00:36  #2 
Apr 2020
875_{10} Posts 
Your instincts are good. It's total nonsense. There are many, many red flags before you even start reading the "proof".

20220503, 00:45  #3 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
9989_{10} Posts 

20220503, 00:56  #4 
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
29×229 Posts 
+ the ALLCAPS title.

20220503, 02:52  #5 
Feb 2017
Nowhere
6,101 Posts 
I suppose the author's previously having published proofs of the Riemann Hypothesis and Fermat's last Theorem  in the same publication, of course  might also be grounds for skepticism.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Idiotic Proof of the Twin primes Conjecture and Goldbach's conjecture  Hugo1177  Miscellaneous Math  1  20210113 22:15 
Twin Prime Conjecture Proof  Steve One  Miscellaneous Math  53  20190318 00:34 
Proof of the twin prime conjecture (NOT!)  Awojobi  Miscellaneous Math  40  20190210 16:36 
A proof for the Twin Prime Conjecture  Carl Fischbach  Miscellaneous Math  7  20090624 05:52 
The Twin Prime Conjecture Song  Templus  Lounge  9  20060314 16:30 