![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2×32×192 Posts |
![]()
This pulses the power; full on a while, then process idle a while. That's not the most efficient way to operate. Reduced clock rate steady state is more efficient than that. It's SOP to run GPUs at reduced power, continuously, for the same reason.
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2021-05-06 at 22:01 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"6800 descendent"
Feb 2005
Colorado
26×11 Posts |
![]()
This is true, but it is a question of priority. If you must cut electric use, this method will definitely accomplish that goal.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2×32×192 Posts |
![]()
The Power settings reference post has been updated.
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2021-05-07 at 00:09 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"Composite as Heck"
Oct 2017
19·47 Posts |
![]()
Eco mode is probably the least hands on way to underclock and should do the job fine, your 65W TDP 3600 will run at a new target of 45W TDP and naturally settle on a lower clock in a better spot on the efficiency curve.
Setting a fixed underclock is probably the best solution for predictable workloads like prime95 but it can't always be done through bios and requires tinkering to find an optimal balance. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
"David Kirkby"
Jan 2021
Althorne, Essex, UK
26·7 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Depending on the number of memory channels that your CPU has, it would perform better with one DIMM per channel, or multiple of that. So reducing RAM might really reduce its performance. Any expenditure of buying different RAM will probably cost you more money than the electricity you could save over the lifetime of the computer. Something else to bear in mind, which is certainly relevant for the PRP tests I run, but maybe not for you, is that the server gives smaller exponents to faster computers. So slowing my machine down, may mean that the server gives be bigger exponents, which take longer to test, so use more electricity. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Mar 2016
397 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"Composite as Heck"
Oct 2017
19·47 Posts |
![]()
ryzenadj is just for ryzen processors with an igpu (if not entirely ryzen mobile). A quick search indicates that eco mode may not show up as an option until PBO is (strangely) enabled; if you've already disabled it, enable it so eco mode can disable it ;)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Random Account
Aug 2009
2·34·13 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I do not know if Linux has something comparable or not. Someone else here may be able to answer this. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
23·32·41 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Mar 2016
6158 Posts |
![]()
I tried several possibilities in the Bios. All in all there is not much progress.
I think, I will run 200 DCs this year and switch off the computer in the hot season. Thanks for your replys. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Mar 2016
18D16 Posts |
![]()
A peaceful and pleasant day for you,
I thought of adding a nvidia geforce 1030 card (passiv, 30 Watt) and use cudalucas instead of mprime. The cpu (Ryzan 3600) use ca. 110 Watt, and the computer in idle time 30 Watt. Is cudalucas still useful ? I installed Cuda 8.0 version and the nvidia-driver 430, but the binary cudalucas goes to Cuda 6.0 Is there a binary update for cudalucas ? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last fiddled with by bhelmes on 2021-08-10 at 17:07 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reducing logging output of mfaktc | daxmick | GPU Computing | 3 | 2018-01-18 01:16 |
ideas for expediting milestones and reducing poaching | ixfd64 | PrimeNet | 19 | 2016-05-19 22:15 |
Free Book II: Electric Boogaloo | chappy | Math | 7 | 2015-11-16 11:00 |
How much do you pay for your electric energy? | em99010pepe | Lounge | 31 | 2011-02-14 01:57 |
Electric Scooter | michaf | Science & Technology | 20 | 2008-06-23 18:52 |