mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-12-17, 07:15   #1365
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

52·131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ET_ View Post
I am actually doing PRP-CF and PRP-CF-D.

Do you think I should stop until things are settled?

Luigi
Yeah, it was only an issue with older Prime95 versions that sent their PRP results to the server in a way that resulted in (sometimes) a missing list of known factors used during the test.

New versions (as George mentioned) will send the results fine.
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-23, 20:26   #1366
tha
 
tha's Avatar
 
Dec 2002

787 Posts
Default

I uploaded two results.txt files through the manual testing page. Among them there is the twin result from this exponent:

Code:
Manual testing	22268579	F-PM1	2017-12-23 19:32	0.0	Factor: 752894280511036848897308855040509839552636123889 / (P-1, B1=350000, B2=7000000, E=6)	0.8378
Manual testing	22268579	F-PM1	2017-12-23 19:32	0.0	Factor: 752894280511036848897308855040509839552636123889 / (P-1, B1=350000, B2=7000000, E=6)
unlike the other three factors that were uploaded in the same batch this twin result does not show up in the 'Current Progress | Recent Cleared' list, not when sorted on date/time stamp and not when sorted on exponent.
They do however show up correctly in the 'My Account | Results' page and therefore are correctly inserted into the database. Seems to be a report problem.
tha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-24, 00:04   #1367
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

717110 Posts
Default

Probably an artifact of the way composite factors are handled.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-24, 00:13   #1368
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

1011111100012 Posts
Default

Composite factors will be broken into their prime component, but a side effect is that while the prime factors are recorded, the result log shows the original result text with the composite factor so the exponent detail page apparently shows the composite factor recorded twice. This is just a display artifact.

What I can't readily explain is why neither the prime nor composite factors, nor indeed that exponent at all, are shown on the recent cleared report.
James Heinrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-10, 23:29   #1369
potonono
 
potonono's Avatar
 
Jun 2005
USA, IL

193 Posts
Default

I have an automatic PRP assignment that seems to have expired in error. The CPU is set to get PRP-100M automatically for one worker, which it did.

https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...2291569&full=1

2017-12-28 Assigned
2018-01-10 P1 results returned
2018-01-10 Expired

It is still in my local work-to-do for the remaining PRP work.

Last fiddled with by potonono on 2018-01-11 at 00:12
potonono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-11, 02:22   #1370
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

71·101 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by potonono View Post
I have an automatic PRP assignment that seems to have expired in error. The CPU is set to get PRP-100M automatically for one worker, which it did.

https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...2291569&full=1

2017-12-28 Assigned
2018-01-10 P1 results returned
2018-01-10 Expired

It is still in my local work-to-do for the remaining PRP work.
Fixed. The P-1 result erroneously unassigned the exponent.

You should have the assignment back now.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-13, 08:29   #1371
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

2·3·263 Posts
Default

It seems the first time checks category 0 threshold is stuck at 76737764 on the Assignment Rules page. This means there are only 10 category 0 LL assignments instead of 200.

Jacob
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-13, 14:21   #1372
cuBerBruce
 
cuBerBruce's Avatar
 
Aug 2012
Mass., USA

2·3·53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S485122 View Post
It seems the first time checks category 0 threshold is stuck at 76737764 on the Assignment Rules page. This means there are only 10 category 0 LL assignments instead of 200.

Jacob
I count 11. You are probably not counting my "hidden" cat 0 (M76722991)
cuBerBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-13, 17:25   #1373
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

71·101 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S485122 View Post
It seems the first time checks category 0 threshold is stuck at 76737764 on the Assignment Rules page. This means there are only 10 category 0 LL assignments instead of 200.

Jacob
Fixed. The stored procedure was not recognizing exponents where a PRP result had been turned in.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-15, 12:56   #1374
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

22×3×5×43 Posts
Default

I'm not sure why, but a user recently ran a PRP test (not a PRP cofactor test) on an already-factored small exponent: M3,859,447.

I think the server rejects LL residue results for already-factored exponents? If so, then probably the behavior should be consistent between LL results and PRP results.

PS,
The same user also ran a PRP test for a very similar exponent (M3,859,477) which doesn't have known factors, but did already have two matching LL tests. Probably this type of result should be accepted by the server, as it was, but it's an unverified result that doesn't need verification, similar to those few exponents in the 75M range (like M75,512,069) where we inadvertently ended up with two matching PRP tests and an unverified LL test. I presume the server already handles this situation and won't automatically assign a double-check on the superfluous test type?
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-15, 16:16   #1375
tha
 
tha's Avatar
 
Dec 2002

14238 Posts
Default

On the page https://www.mersenne.org/report_recent_cleared/ the column 'Result' has been changed to include not just the result itself but also the method how it was obtained.

I have two suggestions.

A. Make the page wider, we now have only half the width of the screen in use and double lines because of the extra information not fitting in the cell.
B. Put the additional info on the method used in a separate cell so that automated use in spreadsheets and programs can use the results without having to undo the cell of the additional info.
tha is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official "Faits erronés dans de belles-lettres" thread ewmayer Lounge 39 2015-05-19 01:08
Official "all-Greek-to-me Fiction Literature and Cinema" Thread ewmayer Science & Technology 41 2014-04-16 11:54
Official "Lasciate ogne speranza" whinge-thread cheesehead Soap Box 56 2013-06-29 01:42
Official "Ernst is a deceiving bully and George is a meanie" thread cheesehead Soap Box 61 2013-06-11 04:30
Official "String copy Statement Considered Harmful" thread Dubslow Programming 19 2012-05-31 17:49

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:30.

Thu Oct 1 16:30:07 UTC 2020 up 21 days, 13:41, 1 user, load averages: 1.66, 1.71, 1.67

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.