20200811, 11:18  #56 
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
2^{2}×13×197 Posts 
Given that you can type in cuneiform, why don't you use the standard representation which is much more widely understood than one which you appear to have invented for your own selfgratification?

20200811, 12:32  #57 
Jan 2020
61_{10} Posts 

20200811, 12:46  #58  
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10244_{10} Posts 
Quote:
π(U+1230D CUNEIFORM SIGN U U U) is thirty. It should be obvious now how to type the remaining numbers. 

20200811, 12:53  #59  
Jan 2020
61 Posts 
Quote:
The numerical symbols I use can stand up to quintillions and still not too long. Last fiddled with by retina on 20200812 at 08:05 Reason: Testing fixes for UTF8 in quote 

20200811, 13:03  #60 
Feb 2017
Nowhere
3^{2}·5·7·11 Posts 
Thanks to whoever moved the thread!
I don't know why the OP considers base twelve to be "better" than base ten (decimal). Decimal is handy because (most) people have ten fingers, although, as Tom Lehrer said in the introduction to his song New Math, "base eight is just like base ten  if you're missing two fingers." Perhaps the OP is polydactyl. There is also the acquired advantage of "Arabic numerals." The standard symbols 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 for the decimal digits has made decimal notation understandable to people around the world. (Using the smallest digits, with the same numerical values as in decimal, for smaller bases (such as binary) automatically gives standard notation for bases two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, and nine as well.) The use of the metric system carries a similar advantage. This was one of the reasons the French promoted the system originally, though at the time, being at war with the rest of Europe, they were unable to secure the cooperation of other nations. But there was a domestic problem in France the metric system was also meant to solve: Every locality had its own system of weights and measures. This made commerce very cumbersome. But simply mandating the use of the metric system didn't solve the problem. People adopted the metric system, but kept right on using their customary units. Finally, the French enacted a law mandating the exclusive use of the metric system starting in 1837. If everyone were to adopt their own numerical system with their own preferred notation, it would bring the the communication of much mathematical knowledge to a dead standstill. Perhaps this is the OP's agenda. I will point out that the good ol' USA adopted a decimal money system from the getgo. As to adopting the exclusive use of the metric system here in the good ol' USA, there is a problem which did not exist, or at least not to anything like the same degree, in 1837. It is the inertia inherent in the vast amount of "English system" hardware, tools, and infrastructure. Every nut and bolt whose diameter is given in inches and threading in threads per inch, every pipe, wire, conduit, and every machine whose specs are in English units and is still in service  including the machines used to manufacture the parts  is an impediment to abandoning the "English system" and so dispensing with the problem of "conversion." One question I like to ask to indicate a practical advantage of the metric system over the "English system" is, "How many cubic inches are there in a pint?" [The answer is 28 and 7/8.] Here in the good ol' USA, the glasses supplied to bars for the specific purpose of disguising the fact that "pints" are less than a (US) pint are called "falsies." Consulting my compilation of various units, I find that an Imperial pint is 20 Imperial fluid ounces, and about 19.2 US fluid ounces. Dispensing with the "obsolete" Fahrenheit temperature scale seems to me to be an easier task. Rather than "converting," I keep in mind some landmarks, here giving the Fahrenheit equivalents merely for ease of reference. Zero degrees Centigrade (32 F) is the freezing point of water. Twenty degrees Centigrade (68 F) is around "room temperature" or the temperature of a pleasantly warm Spring day. Thirty degrees Centigrade (86 F) is a warm summer day. Thirtyseven degrees Centigrade (98.6 F) is "normal body temperature," and a hot summer day (except to folks in the Southern plains where temperatures of fortyfive Centigrade (113 F) and Southwest desert areas, where summer temperatures of fifty Centigrade (122 F) are not uncommon). Fiftyfive Centigrade (131 F) is unlivable for humans. If the ambient temperature stays that high long enough, the heat alone will kill you. But we've got bigger problems with numbers here in the good ol' USA. Zero isn't zero any more, as exemplified by "zero percent" financing. Paper products (like paper towels and TP) are apt to have insane statements of equality like "6 = 24" prominently displayed on the package. 
20200811, 13:22  #61  
Jan 2020
61 Posts 
Quote:
The metric systems can be integrated into different bases as well as long its the 10 of that specific base. The dozenal Celsius seems to have more precision as in between the decimal Celsius and decimal Fahrenheit. Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 20200811 at 13:25 

20200811, 15:00  #62 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
7·617 Posts 
How many people have you managed to convince that base 12 is better?
How many have you tried to convince? Is your failure to convince anyone here due to the ideas and reasons being lousy, or is it a matter of your lack of skill at communicating the greatness of base 12? 
20200811, 15:00  #63  
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101Γ103 Posts
3×19×151 Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 20200811 at 15:00 

20200811, 15:20  #64 
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
2804_{16} Posts 
Akkadian sexagesimal uses 17 characters to represent forty quadrillion, exactly the same as decimal.

20200811, 15:24  #65  
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10244_{10} Posts 
Quote:
Here is the number forty quadrillion expressed in decimal: 40000000000000000 Here is as it would be represented by an Akkadian dubsar: π ππ π ππ ππ ππ π π π ππ π π 3 :58:8:58:49:13:0:5:0:11:6:40 The πsign was used to signify an intermediate zero. It was not used in a terminal position, the power of sixty intended was determined from context. Note that this time I have used alternative representations for twenty, thirty, forty and fifty. 

20200811, 17:25  #66 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2×3^{3}×13^{2} Posts 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Dozenal near and quasi repunit primes  sweety439  And now for something completely different  22  20200721 14:49 
Smallest multiple of n satisfying given condition in dozenal  sweety439  sweety439  0  20200611 06:36 
Mersenne numbers in Dozenal base  tuckerkao  Lounge  7  20200211 04:44 
Jason's sieved ranges(for the prp and llr addicts with Intels)  jasong  Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5  8  20050429 05:13 