20041121, 11:36  #1 
Nov 2004
2·7 Posts 
To create a real random number,
let
random number = q * r where q = an irrational number, r = a rational number Create q and r via any statistical technique to choose two primes, p1, p2 r = p2 q = pi * p2 where pi = 3.14... out (p1) places real random number = q * r = pi * p2 
20041121, 16:22  #2  
Bronze Medalist
Jan 2004
Mumbai,India
2^{2}·3^{3}·19 Posts 
To create a real random number
Quote:
Maybe shaxper you could win. I reproduce a probem in The Sunday Times of India today from 'MINDSPORT' Editor Mukul Sharma " I wish to decode a set of 100 pseudorandom numbers of two digits 01 to 99 which have been placed in a sequence. Could your column provide some help? A reward of Rs.10,000 (rupees ten thousand will paid to the winner) Please guide me as to how I could get the the series decoded." G.B. Goya Sr Mgr, BHEL, gbgoyal@bhelhwr.co.in Mally P.S. I am in no way responsibe for the reward promised. 

20041122, 02:26  #3 
Aug 2002
2^{6}·5 Posts 
Would these numbers be uniformally distributed?
I don't think this method would work too well on a computer since you cannot truely represent an irrational method on a computer. Besides, if you can generate random primes, can't you generate random numbers already? 
20041122, 05:33  #4 
Nov 2004
2×7 Posts 
Update
Hey Makul,
Thanks for the encouragement. :) BTW, further thought on the problem suggested that both numbers (q,r) should be irrational. Here's a better scheme, based on the same concept.  To create a "random number," let a, b = irrational numbers, constants (like pi, e, c, or sqrt(2)) Create, via two different statistical techniques, two "random" primes, p1, p2 q1 = p1 * a q2 = p2 * b where a = constant out to (p1) places, b = constant out to (p2) places For example, let a = 3.14, pi out to 2 places b = 1.414, sqrt(2) out to 3 places then q1 * q2 = (p1 * a) * (p2 * b) = (2 * 3.14) * (3 * 1.414) = 26.63976 It seems to me that finding the two primes (2,3) in the number 26.63976 would be very difficult if you didn't know the two schemes for creating p1 and p2 along with the two irrational constants. (And even more difficult if you invert the second constant so that a > 1, b < 1.) Any thoughts anybody? >Would these numbers be uniformally distributed? No. I don't think there is such a thing as truly random, i.e. no order at all. Therefore, the next best thing is creating a number that hides the order. >I don't think this method would work too well on a computer >since you cannot truely represent an irrational method on a >computer. Actually, that's the beauty of this scheme because the irrational number is represented out to a finite number (p1, p2) of digits. >Besides, if you can generate random primes, can't you >generate random numbers already? There's no such thing as random, so the primes you generate aren't "really" random and, therefore, neither would the numbers that this scheme generates. But, hopefully  and this is where my knowledge falls short  this scheme hides the order better then currently existing statistical techniques. cheers, jad Last fiddled with by shaxper on 20041122 at 05:39 Reason: correction 
20041122, 06:37  #5 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
17014_{8} Posts 
I recommend Art of Computer Programming, Volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms by Donald E, Knuth  Chapter 3 covers random and pseudorandom numbers.
This book and its companion volumes 1 and 3 are worth getting for one's library. From http://wwwcsfaculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/taocp.html: "At the end of 1999, these books were named among the best twelve scientific monographs of the century by American Scientist, along with: Dirac on quantum mechanics, Einstein on relativity, Mandelbrot on fractals, Pauling on the chemical bond, Russell and Whitehead on foundations of mathematics, von Neumann and Morgenstern on game theory, Wiener on cybernetics, Woodward and Hoffmann on orbital symmetry, Feynman on quantum electrodynamics, Smith on the search for structure, and Einstein's collected papers." Note: The series was originally titled "The Art of Computer Programming", so it's often referredto by the acronym TAOCP. Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 20041122 at 06:40 
20041123, 22:14  #6  
Aug 2002
30_{10} Posts 
Quote:
</pedant> Oh, and shaxper... every number you ever do any computing with will be rational. Last fiddled with by toferc on 20041123 at 22:16 

20041125, 05:30  #7 
Aug 2003
Snicker, AL
7·137 Posts 
Re the statement There's no such thing as random, so the primes you generate aren't "really" random and, therefore, neither would the numbers that this scheme generates. But, hopefully  and this is where my knowledge falls short  this scheme hides the order better then currently existing statistical techniques.
I will agree that methods we have today generate only pseudorandom numbers. However, I'd suspect that there must be a way to generate truly random numbers based on the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Thoughts anyone? Fusion 
20041125, 07:04  #8  
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
2×3×5×7×23 Posts 
Quote:
Luigi Last fiddled with by ET_ on 20041125 at 07:05 

20041125, 07:17  #9 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts 
Actually, using quantum uncertainty to generate random numbers should be quite simple.
Get a radioactive nucleus with a halflife of x seconds. Wait for x seconds. If it decays, write 1. If it doesn't decay, write 0. Repeat. 
20041125, 15:50  #10  
Bronze Medalist
Jan 2004
Mumbai,India
2^{2}×3^{3}×19 Posts 
To create a real random number
Quote:
Mally 

20041125, 16:23  #11 
Bronze Medalist
Jan 2004
Mumbai,India
2^{2}×3^{3}×19 Posts 
To create a real random number
[QUOTE=cheesehead]I recommend Art of Computer Programming, Volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms by Donald E, Knuth  Chapter 3 covers random and pseudorandom numbers.
This book and its companion volumes 1 and 3 are worth getting for one's library.Un Quote] Thank you for recmmending these books of TAOCP. As India prints these books brand new under licence but for resticted sale to India, Bangla Desh & Ceylon(Sri Lanka) I was able to order all 3 volumes for as little as under $20. Not bad Eh? I have a few of the other books related to math and physics as mentioned by American Scientist in my possesion and these 3 vols will be a welcome addition. Mally Last fiddled with by mfgoode on 20041125 at 16:27 Reason: Entered wrong price 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Finding multiples of a real number that are close to a whole number  mickfrancis  Math  16  20170301 07:17 
Using quarternions instead of Gaussian primes when factoring a real number?  Stargate38  Factoring  4  20120410 04:20 
Odds that a Random Prime is a Number?  R.D. Silverman  Homework Help  60  20101013 10:31 
About random number (random seed) in Msieve  Greenk12  Factoring  1  20081115 13:56 
Largest number in the real universe  danjmi  Science & Technology  17  20040926 20:25 