mersenneforum.org > Data Strategic Double Clicking
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2016-02-23, 03:13 #881 Madpoo Serpentine Vermin Jar     Jul 2014 331310 Posts Here's a new list. Some of these are in the "churn" zone... may go fast. Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 38305409 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38305409,71,1 38601403 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38601403,71,1 38941213 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38941213,71,1 39239509 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39239509,71,1 39263383 13 6 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=39263383,71,1 39273809 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39273809,71,1 40356571 8 3 6 2 6 2 DoubleCheck=40356571,72,1 40392127 8 4 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=40392127,72,1 40568431 18 5 1 4 1 4 DoubleCheck=40568431,72,1 40605407 4 0 5 1 4 2 DoubleCheck=40605407,72,1 46550347 2 1 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46550347,72,1
 2016-02-23, 03:42 #882 markr     "Mark" Feb 2003 Sydney 3×191 Posts Thanks! A big thank you to Madpoo for triple-checking 35895053 and 36011531! I would have been surprised if the bad results were mine, but you never know. So good to not have a long wait before resolution. They were cat 3's back in August, so the triple-checks would have had to wait at least for the head of the cat 2 queue to move up to them (it's nearly there now) and it probably would have slipped past them anyway, leaving them at the back of the cat 1 queue.
2016-02-23, 06:11   #883
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

63618 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by markr A big thank you to Madpoo for triple-checking 35895053 and 36011531! I would have been surprised if the bad results were mine, but you never know. So good to not have a long wait before resolution. They were cat 3's back in August, so the triple-checks would have had to wait at least for the head of the cat 2 queue to move up to them (it's nearly there now) and it probably would have slipped past them anyway, leaving them at the back of the cat 1 queue.
Yeah, all part of my (and AirSquirrels too) plan to slog away at some of these triple-checks that are needed.

My ultimate goal with those is to build up the knowledge of bad/good machines, but it's also kind of fun to clear those out anyway.

2016-02-23, 07:01   #884
dragonbud20

Mar 2014

24·5 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Here's a new list. Some of these are in the "churn" zone... may go fast. Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 38305409 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38305409,71,1 38601403 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38601403,71,1 38941213 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38941213,71,1
going to take these for work over the next week or so

2016-02-24, 01:23   #885
bgbeuning

Dec 2014

25510 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Here's a new list. Some of these are in the "churn" zone... may go fast. Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 39239509 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39239509,71,1 39263383 13 6 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=39263383,71,1 39273809 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39273809,71,1 40356571 8 3 6 2 6 2 DoubleCheck=40356571,72,1 40392127 8 4 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=40392127,72,1 40568431 18 5 1 4 1 4 DoubleCheck=40568431,72,1 40605407 4 0 5 1 4 2 DoubleCheck=40605407,72,1 46550347 2 1 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46550347,72,1
Queued up the other 8 of them.

 2016-02-25, 18:47 #886 Madpoo Serpentine Vermin Jar     Jul 2014 3,313 Posts Here's another handful if anyone's interested. I'll try to just pop a few of these in here now and then. Overall, I think we've done a really good job of getting the low hanging fruit, and we're getting down to stuff where the CPU has less than a 2;1 bad/good ratio. Still WAY higher than they should be, but just not as certain we'll mismatch on our run. For those I'll probably start pulling out just the smallest available exponent from those systems so we can test just one more at a time and see which direction we're heading before we pull more from the same thing. I've also setup another query to narrow results down by year and month to try and spot systems that were mostly good for a year or a quarter, but had a bad month... apparently that's a thing, there are machines like that. Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 39125137 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=39125137,71,1 39239509 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39239509,71,1 39263383 13 6 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=39263383,71,1 39273809 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39273809,71,1 39285991 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=39285991,71,1 46550347 2 1 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46550347,72,1 52276529 25 3 1 5 1 5 DoubleCheck=52276529,73,1 63462271 23 11 2 5 2 5 DoubleCheck=63462271,74,1
 2016-02-25, 18:56 #887 Prime95 P90 years forever!     Aug 2002 Yeehaw, FL 7·1,091 Posts I took these: Code: 39125137 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=39125137,71,1 39239509 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39239509,71,1 39263383 13 6 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=39263383,71,1 39273809 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39273809,71,1 39285991 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=39285991,71,1 That 52M one with 25 bad to 3 good looks very tasty....
 2016-02-25, 19:04 #888 Mark Rose     "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 37·79 Posts I took these two: Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 46550347 2 1 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46550347,72,1 52276529 25 3 1 5 1 5 DoubleCheck=52276529,73,1
 2016-02-26, 20:36 #889 fivemack (loop (#_fork))     Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 144518 Posts My first batch of strategic DCs in the 50M range is over. Could I request triple-checks for 50803771, 53998279, 50967491 ? Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2016-02-26 at 20:38
2016-02-27, 03:04   #890
bgbeuning

Dec 2014

3×5×17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by fivemack Could I request triple-checks for 50803771, 53998279, 50967491 ?
They are running.

2016-02-28, 01:44   #891
bgbeuning

Dec 2014

3·5·17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 39125137 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=39125137,71,1 39239509 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39239509,71,1 39263383 13 6 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=39263383,71,1 39273809 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39273809,71,1 39285991 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=39285991,71,1 46550347 2 1 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46550347,72,1 52276529 25 3 1 5 1 5 DoubleCheck=52276529,73,1 63462271 23 11 2 5 2 5 DoubleCheck=63462271,74,1
This list and the one from 22 Feb seem to have a couple of duplicates.
I guess we are quad checking those.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mysticial Software 52 2021-04-23 06:51 marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56 jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01 Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 05:21.

Sat Oct 23 05:21:13 UTC 2021 up 91 days, 23:50, 0 users, load averages: 1.17, 1.31, 1.17