mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data > Marin's Mersenne-aries

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2016-02-11, 07:26   #837
0PolarBearsHere
 
0PolarBearsHere's Avatar
 
Oct 2015

26610 Posts
Default

Based on the mersenne.ca report it looks like the 770 LLs best at 55M, so I'm happy to take a half dozen of the 55M range to start off with (machine only runs in the evenings).
Actually, give me a couple of the 37M ones too, that I can run first to check.

Last fiddled with by 0PolarBearsHere on 2016-02-11 at 07:35
0PolarBearsHere is offline  
Old 2016-02-11, 10:01   #838
manfred4
 
manfred4's Avatar
 
Mar 2014
Germany

23×3×5 Posts
Default

Hey Madpoo, I would like to have some of those triple checks as well - I started with two successfull DCs on my 670 and switched to first time LLs, but I think helping you here would make you happy as well and I will check the capabilities of my GPU further.
I will leave this machine running without supervision for some time, so could you please give me about 35 of the smallest available tests? Results may be coming in sporadically.
manfred4 is offline  
Old 2016-02-11, 10:43   #839
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

3×19×113 Posts
Default

I guess it's not worth individually requesting TCs - the mismatches go in the databases and the TCs will get scheduled the next time madpoo does a run - but I have a mismatch for 50015437.
fivemack is offline  
Old 2016-02-11, 15:18   #840
dragonbud20
 
dragonbud20's Avatar
 
Mar 2014

24×5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
I guess it's not worth individually requesting TCs - the mismatches go in the databases and the TCs will get scheduled the next time madpoo does a run - but I have a mismatch for 50015437.
got it. ETA: 5 days
dragonbud20 is offline  
Old 2016-02-11, 16:10   #841
cuBerBruce
 
cuBerBruce's Avatar
 
Aug 2012
Mass., USA

31810 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
Code:
Exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
45422269	1	0	3	1	3	1	DoubleCheck=45422269,72,1
I got a mismatch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
Code:
exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
49812869	2	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=49812869,72,1
50145749	2	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=50145749,73,1
I got a mismatch on 49812869, but matched on 50145749.

Last fiddled with by cuBerBruce on 2016-02-11 at 16:11
cuBerBruce is offline  
Old 2016-02-12, 05:36   #842
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

3,313 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 0PolarBearsHere View Post
Based on the mersenne.ca report it looks like the 770 LLs best at 55M, so I'm happy to take a half dozen of the 55M range to start off with (machine only runs in the evenings).
Actually, give me a couple of the 37M ones too, that I can run first to check.
Here you go. I picked triple-checks where neither of the first two systems have enough track record to know if they're good or bad. The outcome of these TC's will (hopefully) declare the winner and bump someone further into bad territory.

Code:
exponent	worktodo
55110421	DoubleCheck=55110421,73,1
55112119	DoubleCheck=55112119,73,1
55137587	DoubleCheck=55137587,73,1
55197383	DoubleCheck=55197383,73,1
55203487	DoubleCheck=55203487,73,1
55235711	DoubleCheck=55235711,74,1
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2016-02-12, 05:41   #843
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

3,313 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by manfred4 View Post
Hey Madpoo, I would like to have some of those triple checks as well - I started with two successfull DCs on my 670 and switched to first time LLs, but I think helping you here would make you happy as well and I will check the capabilities of my GPU further.
I will leave this machine running without supervision for some time, so could you please give me about 35 of the smallest available tests? Results may be coming in sporadically.
The smallest ones are in the 37M range and then into the 38M range.

As with the ones I just picked out for 0PolarBearsHere, the outcome of this triple-check should bump one of the other machines further into "bad" territory (that's why they're not all 37M, because in many of those I guess I'm better able to predict the winner):

Code:
37000979	DoubleCheck=37000979,71,1
37041383	DoubleCheck=37041383,71,1
37049641	DoubleCheck=37049641,71,1
37082791	DoubleCheck=37082791,71,1
37093547	DoubleCheck=37093547,71,1
37137127	DoubleCheck=37137127,71,1
37536589	DoubleCheck=37536589,71,1
37723177	DoubleCheck=37723177,71,1
37824119	DoubleCheck=37824119,71,1
37938911	DoubleCheck=37938911,71,1
38019811	DoubleCheck=38019811,71,1
38117503	DoubleCheck=38117503,71,1
38140309	DoubleCheck=38140309,71,1
38146897	DoubleCheck=38146897,71,1
38160509	DoubleCheck=38160509,71,1
38208473	DoubleCheck=38208473,71,1
38238749	DoubleCheck=38238749,71,1
38276437	DoubleCheck=38276437,71,1
38280547	DoubleCheck=38280547,71,1
38352581	DoubleCheck=38352581,71,1
38386063	DoubleCheck=38386063,71,1
38433071	DoubleCheck=38433071,71,1
38439551	DoubleCheck=38439551,71,1
38441353	DoubleCheck=38441353,71,1
38468119	DoubleCheck=38468119,71,1
38469763	DoubleCheck=38469763,71,1
38494051	DoubleCheck=38494051,71,1
38499931	DoubleCheck=38499931,71,1
38555171	DoubleCheck=38555171,71,1
38583751	DoubleCheck=38583751,71,1
38600299	DoubleCheck=38600299,71,1
38600339	DoubleCheck=38600339,71,1
38600459	DoubleCheck=38600459,71,1
38600473	DoubleCheck=38600473,71,1
38613037	DoubleCheck=38613037,71,1
Make sure they're still available and try to get them assigned by stuffing them into a Prime95 worktodo first.

All but a few of these 37M/38M are well into cat 2 territory (with a few in the upper cat 1). The ones I picked for 0PolarBearsHere are way past cat 4 so he could actually reserve those on the manual page if he likes.
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2016-02-12, 05:43   #844
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

331310 Posts
Default

Meanwhile, if you're hungry for some good old fashioned strategic double checks, here's the latest batch of 2+ to 1 bad-to-good. Some are in the cat 4 "churn" category (the 40M-42M) so get 'em while you can.

Code:
exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
38341909	2	1	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=38341909,71,1
38456843	2	1	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=38456843,71,1
38898667	8	4	3	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=38898667,71,1
40459187	5	1	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=40459187,72,1
40494269	6	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=40494269,72,1
40575707	2	0	3	0	1	2	DoubleCheck=40575707,72,1
41537261	4	0	1	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=41537261,72,1
42393961	2	0	5	0	5	0	DoubleCheck=42393961,72,1
42430061	2	1	2	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=42430061,72,1
52276529	21	3	5	5	5	5	DoubleCheck=52276529,73,1
58080709	2	0	4	0	4	0	DoubleCheck=58080709,73,1
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2016-02-12, 07:31   #845
0PolarBearsHere
 
0PolarBearsHere's Avatar
 
Oct 2015

2·7·19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
Here you go. I picked triple-checks where neither of the first two systems have enough track record to know if they're good or bad. The outcome of these TC's will (hopefully) declare the winner and bump someone further into bad territory.

Code:
exponent    worktodo
55110421    DoubleCheck=55110421,73,1
55112119    DoubleCheck=55112119,73,1
55137587    DoubleCheck=55137587,73,1
55197383    DoubleCheck=55197383,73,1
55203487    DoubleCheck=55203487,73,1
55235711    DoubleCheck=55235711,74,1
Thanks!
0PolarBearsHere is offline  
Old 2016-02-12, 10:47   #846
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

11·439 Posts
Default

Code:
DoubleCheck=46101953,72,1
Verified OK
ET_ is offline  
Old 2016-02-12, 10:54   #847
manfred4
 
manfred4's Avatar
 
Mar 2014
Germany

11110002 Posts
Default

Thank you, got them all reserved.
And I think you mean, they are all in Cat 3 with a few in Cat 2, right? Because as of now it says Cat 1 is Exponents below 35780412.
manfred4 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Double-Double Arithmetic Mysticial Software 52 2021-04-23 06:51
Clicking an exponent leads to 404 page marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56
x.265 half the size, double the computation; so if you double again? 1/4th? jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56
What about double-checking TF/P-1? 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01
Double the area, Double the volume. Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:48.


Sat Oct 23 23:48:41 UTC 2021 up 92 days, 18:17, 0 users, load averages: 1.51, 1.37, 1.23

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.