mersenneforum.org > Data Strategic Double Clicking
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2016-01-26, 17:33 #760 Mark Rose     "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 37×79 Posts It would be nice if the server only assigned triple checks to only proven reliable machines. Perhaps add a checkbox to prefer triple checks like there is for lowest exponents? That would automate a lot of this effort, plus keep workers that don't turn in results from holding strategic assignments. A second tweak would be to double check work done by proven unreliable machines. A third tweak would be to assign new CPUs double checks from work done by proven reliable machines -- that would quickly identify flaky machines for the second tweak. I don't know how easy these would be to implement.
2016-01-26, 17:43   #761
Mark Rose

"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

37·79 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Here are those available exponents needing quad checks. That smallest one just showed up today after a triple check I ran failed to match either previous run. I'm pretty sure all of these have one test by me: Code: DoubleCheck=35540807,71,1
Mine.

2016-01-26, 18:19   #762
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

23·433 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo I'm pretty sure all of these have one test by me:
Aaron, could I ask you to generate a list of 24 SDCs for me which will help machines be bumped into the good / bad ratio threshold for your heuristics? Preferably different machines for each candidate to be DC'ed/TC'ed.

In my mind it doesn't make sense for my machines to QC a candidate you've already DC'ed/TC'ed, since it will simply confirm what your queries already suspect (no joke intend).

Secondly, I agree with Mark's suggestions above. Perhaps it is time to automate this (if it isn't too much work).

2016-01-27, 00:26   #763
dragonbud20

Mar 2014

24×5 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Here are those available exponents needing quad checks. Code: DoubleCheck=49654117,72,1 DoubleCheck=50128459,73,1 DoubleCheck=50919889,73,1
I'll take these

2016-01-28, 16:27   #764
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

3,313 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by chalsall Aaron, could I ask you to generate a list of 24 SDCs for me which will help machines be bumped into the good / bad ratio threshold for your heuristics? Preferably different machines for each candidate to be DC'ed/TC'ed....
Here's a list of exponents that have been double-checked with a mismatch. In each case, both machines are within just one bad result away from being thrust unmercifully into the "equal bad and good" category. The result of this triple check will push one or the other.

Code:
exponent	worktodo
36987347	DoubleCheck=36987347,71,1
38555057	DoubleCheck=38555057,71,1
38830921	DoubleCheck=38830921,71,1
38919169	DoubleCheck=38919169,71,1
51344617	DoubleCheck=51344617,73,1
51723311	DoubleCheck=51723311,73,1
51872731	DoubleCheck=51872731,73,1
51913793	DoubleCheck=51913793,73,1
52910057	DoubleCheck=52910057,73,1
53130773	DoubleCheck=53130773,73,1
53860589	DoubleCheck=53860589,73,1
55675049	DoubleCheck=55675049,73,1
56234723	DoubleCheck=56234723,74,1
56539541	DoubleCheck=56539541,73,1
58241527	DoubleCheck=58241527,73,1
58479067	DoubleCheck=58479067,73,1
58805933	DoubleCheck=58805933,73,1
59898451	DoubleCheck=59898451,73,1
60751577	DoubleCheck=60751577,74,1
60790393	DoubleCheck=60790393,74,1
61826683	DoubleCheck=61826683,74,1
62306407	DoubleCheck=62306407,74,1
62621821	DoubleCheck=62621821,74,1
63173237	DoubleCheck=63173237,74,1
63643253	DoubleCheck=63643253,74,1
64466929	DoubleCheck=64466929,74,1
64648789	DoubleCheck=64648789,74,1
64687591	DoubleCheck=64687591,74,1
64792009	DoubleCheck=64792009,74,1
66512779	DoubleCheck=66512779,75,1
67694827	DoubleCheck=67694827,75,1
74049919	DoubleCheck=74049919,75,1

2016-01-28, 16:58   #765
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

23×433 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo The result of this triple check will push one or the other.
Thanks. Taken.

 2016-01-29, 04:37 #766 Madpoo Serpentine Vermin Jar     Jul 2014 3,313 Posts Here's a list... smallest available exponent for any machine with more bad than good. The ones that are just slightly over a 1:1 bad/good ratio are interesting, but I like to test another one and see which way it goes before trying to tackle more. I found one recently that way... started with 1 bad, zero good. It's up to a (presumed) 15 bad, zero good. They were all exponents in the 60-70M range so I just snagged them myself, being larger. Anyway, maybe we'll get some good ones like that out of this list, and some are already well into the "bad" group, so be sure to snag those while you can. Code: Exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 37334837 2 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=37334837,71,1 37865777 3 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=37865777,71,1 38194643 1 0 3 4 3 4 DoubleCheck=38194643,71,1 38217323 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=38217323,71,1 38347571 1 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=38347571,71,1 38471309 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38471309,71,1 38475653 1 0 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=38475653,71,1 38592787 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=38592787,71,1 38619751 6 5 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=38619751,71,1 38651779 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=38651779,71,1 38652533 5 2 4 0 3 1 DoubleCheck=38652533,71,1 38851957 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38851957,71,1 38948521 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=38948521,71,1 41268527 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=41268527,72,1 41402099 4 1 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=41402099,72,1 41458877 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41458877,72,1 42036389 6 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=42036389,72,1 45422269 1 0 3 1 3 1 DoubleCheck=45422269,72,1 46217657 2 0 3 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=46217657,72,1 47673583 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=47673583,72,1 47955311 2 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=47955311,72,1 48700441 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=48700441,72,1 50145749 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=50145749,73,1 51770489 15 4 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=51770489,73,1 54801569 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=54801569,73,1 55380979 4 3 10 0 10 0 DoubleCheck=55380979,74,1 57517913 4 3 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=57517913,73,1 57989447 11 7 51 9 51 9 DoubleCheck=57989447,73,1 65095861 1 0 2 2 2 2 DoubleCheck=65095861,74,1 66357407 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=66357407,74,1 67362901 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=67362901,75,1 67665181 1 0 0 3 1 2 DoubleCheck=67665181,75,1 77900497 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=77900497,74,1
 2016-01-29, 06:41 #767 kladner     "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 2·3·1,693 Posts I'll queue the first one. DoubleCheck=37334837,71,1 Last fiddled with by kladner on 2016-01-29 at 06:41
 2016-01-29, 10:23 #768 ET_ Banned     "Luigi" Aug 2002 Team Italia 3×1,609 Posts These are mine! DoubleCheck=37865777,71,1 DoubleCheck=38194643,71,1 DoubleCheck=38217323,71,1 Last fiddled with by ET_ on 2016-01-29 at 10:38
2016-01-29, 12:23   #769
ric

Jul 2004
Milan, Ita

22×47 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Here's a list... smallest available exponent for any machine with more bad than good. Code: Exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 38347571 1 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=38347571,71,1 38471309 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38471309,71,1 38475653 1 0 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=38475653,71,1 38592787 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=38592787,71,1 38619751 6 5 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=38619751,71,1 38651779 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=38651779,71,1 38652533 5 2 4 0 3 1 DoubleCheck=38652533,71,1 38851957 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38851957,71,1 38948521 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=38948521,71,1
mine

2016-01-29, 17:24   #770
cuBerBruce

Aug 2012
Mass., USA

2×3×53 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Here's a list... smallest available exponent for any machine with more bad than good. Code: Exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo ... 41268527 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=41268527,72,1 41402099 4 1 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=41402099,72,1 41458877 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41458877,72,1 42036389 6 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=42036389,72,1 ,,,
These seem to be taken by ANONYMOUS users. Maybe ordinary cat 4 wave assignments?

Quote:
 [CODE 45422269 1 0 3 1 3 1 DoubleCheck=45422269,72,1 [/CODE]
I took this one.

Last fiddled with by cuBerBruce on 2016-01-29 at 17:25 Reason: typo

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mysticial Software 52 2021-04-23 06:51 marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56 jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01 Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:18.

Sat Oct 23 04:18:33 UTC 2021 up 91 days, 22:47, 0 users, load averages: 1.79, 1.76, 1.59

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.