mersenneforum.org > Data Strategic Double Clicking
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2015-11-25, 04:13   #562

"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

27AE16 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kladner http://www.mersenneforum.org/images/...s/viewpost.gif I would like to throw these two back in the pool: DoubleCheck=57936677,73,1 DoubleCheck=59272363,73,1 I am running 57798707. Thanks, Kieren
I am trying to complete the last-mentioned assignment, but I am getting pessimistic about reliability with the current crop of resets, which put the VRAM on the MSI 580, running CuLu, back at the BIOS setting of 2100 MHz, I am pessimistic about reliability. I did stop, and run -r 1 and a fairly long memtest with the RAM set to 2100 (DDR), both of which passed. If I were really concerned, I might take CuLu off the looping batch file, and only restart it manually with everything reset to 'safe' frequencies. Voltage does not get reset, at least, but the memory clock is worrisome. I have gotten a match or two from this card, but I get a lot more payback with it overclocked, doing LLTF.

In any case, I can't take on the ones in red, above. They are from one of Aaron's lists of questionable machines.

Thanks,
Kieren

2015-11-25, 07:48   #563
dragonbud20

Mar 2014

8010 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kladner Please allow me to back off from some of this. I am much more involved with TF work, so I was thinking backwards about the workload of higher exponents in LL. I would like to throw these two back in the pool: DoubleCheck=57936677,73,1 DoubleCheck=59272363,73,1 I am running 57798707. Thanks, Kieren
Quote:
 Originally Posted by kladner In any case, I can't take on the ones in red, above. They are from one of Aaron's lists of questionable machines. Thanks, Kieren
I'll take care of theses two for you. ETA: both will be done by the 2nd of December.

Last fiddled with by dragonbud20 on 2015-11-25 at 07:50

2015-11-25, 19:19   #564

"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

1015810 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by dragonbud20 I'll take care of theses two for you. ETA: both will be done by the 2nd of December.
Many thanks!

2015-11-26, 05:20   #565
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

3,313 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kladner I am trying to complete the last-mentioned assignment...
If M57798707 that you're testing ends up with a mismatch, let us know and myself or someone else can do the triple-check, just in case.

Normally I'd trust everyone here to have a solid result with their test, but if in doubt, we can do the triple-check ahead of schedule like some of you have asked in the past.

 2015-11-26, 12:47 #566 LaurV Romulan Interpreter     "name field" Jun 2011 Thailand 9,787 Posts I have just seen that 59662607 got TC-ed and matched mine. Good job Mike. The other (59273327) is still unassigned. Keeping my eyes on it.
2015-11-26, 22:50   #567

"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2·3·1,693 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo If M57798707 that you're testing ends up with a mismatch, let us know and myself or someone else can do the triple-check, just in case. Normally I'd trust everyone here to have a solid result with their test, but if in doubt, we can do the triple-check ahead of schedule like some of you have asked in the past.
Will do.

EDIT:
About 8 hours to go, running now. I do want to be around when it finishes, so I can reconfigure, and put the card back to LLTF work. I hate to have it sit there just looping the batch file, with no work to do.

Last fiddled with by kladner on 2015-11-26 at 22:57

2015-11-27, 11:30   #568
endless mike

Jan 2004
Milwaukee, WI

8C16 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Here's a new list of 3:1 bad/good, including a few with even higher bad/good ratios. There are some larger exponents in the list if anyone feels like tackling the big boys (over 60M): Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 60039731 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=60039731,73,1 60039827 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=60039827,73,1 60439991 3 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=60439991,73,1 60453149 3 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=60453149,73,1 61485799 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=61485799,74,1 61552459 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=61552459,74,1 62302013 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=62302013,74,1 62494429 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=62494429,74,1 64957247 3 0 7 0 6 1 DoubleCheck=64957247,74,1 65438599 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=65438599,74,1 65862781 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=65862781,74,1 67457263 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=67457263,74,1 67457279 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=67457279,74,1 67983401 3 0 7 0 6 1 DoubleCheck=67983401,74,1 67983437 3 0 7 0 6 1 DoubleCheck=67983437,74,1 68099827 3 0 7 0 6 1 DoubleCheck=68099827,74,1 69454223 3 0 2 2 2 2 DoubleCheck=69454223,74,1 69643967 3 0 7 0 6 1 DoubleCheck=69643967,74,1 69675233 3 0 2 2 2 2 DoubleCheck=69675233,74,1
Looks like no one has claimed any of the greater over 60M, so I added them to my machines to run.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaurV I have just seen that 59662607 got TC-ed and matched mine. Good job Mike. The other (59273327) is still unassigned. Keeping my eyes on it.
Just doing some random triple checks on stuff people mentioned not getting a match of in this thread. I added the other one to my worktodo just now to balance out the 19 that I claimed above.

All should be complete before the end of December.

2015-11-27, 11:35   #569
endless mike

Jan 2004
Milwaukee, WI

2148 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo In case anyone wants more of these fun assignments... Code: exponent Ratio Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo exponent Ratio Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 38130749 4.00 4 1 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=38130749,71,1 43919461 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=43919461,72,1 43919527 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=43919527,72,1 43919671 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=43919671,72,1 44771917 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=44771917,72,1 44946037 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=44946037,72,1 45535901 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=45535901,72,1 46300987 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=46300987,72,1 47425219 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=47425219,72,1 47568511 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=47568511,72,1 37595837 3.00 6 2 3 2 2 3 DoubleCheck=37595837,71,1 42407327 3.00 3 0 6 4 6 4 DoubleCheck=42407327,72,1 42719503 3.00 3 0 6 4 6 4 DoubleCheck=42719503,72,1 43389751 3.00 3 0 3 1 3 1 DoubleCheck=43389751,72,1 43612379 3.00 3 0 6 4 6 4 DoubleCheck=43612379,72,1 43927669 3.00 3 0 6 4 6 4 DoubleCheck=43927669,72,1
Quote:
 Originally Posted by endless mike Taking these 16
Quote:
 Originally Posted by endless mike Twelve of them have completed, all twelve will need a triple check.
The last four completed, two matched, two didn't.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Oh wow, good job! That's quite the string of mismatches. On a good day I've probably seen 75% of my tests mismatch the first run...I don't think I've had a run of 12.
Yeah, I was quite impressed with the run of luck there

2015-11-28, 02:35   #570

"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

100111101011102 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo If M57798707 that you're testing ends up with a mismatch, let us know and myself or someone else can do the triple-check, just in case. Normally I'd trust everyone here to have a solid result with their test, but if in doubt, we can do the triple-check ahead of schedule like some of you have asked in the past.
I mismatched, but as I said, I am a bit leery of my own results. Under the circumstances, I'd be very pleasantly surprised if someone else happened to match mine.

 2015-11-28, 06:27 #571 LaurV Romulan Interpreter     "name field" Jun 2011 Thailand 9,787 Posts Wow! I mean WOW! 14 of 16 mismatched ? @kladner: You should not be worried. I think more like Chris said: Madpoo is really into something here! Those initial tests were bad! I had DC/TC mismatches too, and they all checked mine by third parties TC/QC respectively, except one which is on the way to TC. I would bet that your result is ok (and endless mike's too). Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-11-28 at 06:30
2015-11-28, 07:33   #572
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

3,313 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kladner I mismatched, but as I said, I am a bit leery of my own results. Under the circumstances, I'd be very pleasantly surprised if someone else happened to match mine.
We'll know in another 17 hours when my triple-check of that # finishes.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mysticial Software 52 2021-04-23 06:51 marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56 jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01 Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:56.

Sun Oct 24 00:56:12 UTC 2021 up 92 days, 19:25, 0 users, load averages: 1.59, 1.19, 1.14