![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
23·3·11·17 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Perhaps EdH can give us a synopsis on how to run client boxes. Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2022-05-09 at 18:23 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
32·7·83 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Basically, I have an exact same user account on all the machines, with an exact same directory tree, and all machines are key linked via ssh with every other machine. This linking of all machines to all others is important. ecmpi is compiled on each machine, and the hostfile lists the localhost slots= and the user@IP slots= for each client. I can get more detailed later. Let me look over the rest of the thread. Or, I'll try to answer more questions. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
10100011011012 Posts |
![]()
I'm not familiar enough with all the required libraries to implement this, yet. But, it appears that others are running openmpi and xilman knows how to incorporate LAN connected clients (which I already suspected). I'll address further questions, if any arise.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
32×1,117 Posts |
![]()
I found an interesting feature in this implementation - it doesn't back-track. Could be something that is left for later work. This has a downside of sometimes taking more time in one single step than all the others combined.
In proving a 12k digit number, one step took 10 hrs (already near 10k digit size, i.e. similar to Greg's number above which took 20hrs in all, and on similar node) and then proceeded fast. This is deterministic, too - when repeated again from that step, it took ~10 hours again. I sent the debug case input to Andreas. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Jul 2003
So Cal
72×53 Posts |
![]()
Certification of a 15k digit prime, 2^49831-3637, took 29.7 hours using 12x Xeon E5-2670 v2 cpus with a total of 120 cores and 240 hyperthreads. The longest step of the second phase took 6.3 hours to complete.
It appears that idle processes near the end of the second phase continue to use processor time. I will next try a run with one process per core rather than two. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Jan 2007
Germany
22×5×31 Posts |
![]()
Wow , 15k in 30h ..that is fast !
So I have 3 milestone 20k numbers for testing ! Smallest 20000 digit prime and prime twins. 10^19999+110949 10^19999+1514722609+d, d=0,2 Should be done, the prover extended this page... https://pzktupel.de/smx000.html regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
23·3·11·17 Posts |
![]() Quote:
As far as I can tell, the clients require passwordless ssh keys along with identical project directories and an installation of mpi. Do the clients require ecpp-mpi too? Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2022-05-10 at 16:04 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 | ||
Jul 2003
So Cal
A2516 Posts |
![]() Quote:
No No Quote:
Yes, each compiled for the processor on which it will be run. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |
Jul 2003
So Cal
72×53 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
Bamboozled!
"๐บ๐๐ท๐ท๐ญ"
May 2003
Down not across
2·5,827 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Looks like my choice of 1 process per core was (accidentally) correct. Still wondering whether n+1 on a n-core machine might be a better choice to soak up some of the hyperthreading and have n workers alongside the single master. Next time, perhaps. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
1,321 Posts |
![]()
On a fixed system, fastECPP was around double the speed of Primo for a ~10k digit prime.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
what is the best primality software? | bbb120 | Proth Prime Search | 75 | 2022-10-08 11:45 |
Fastest software for Mersenne primality test? | JonathanM | Information & Answers | 25 | 2020-06-16 02:47 |
APR-CL as primality proof | f1pokerspeed | FactorDB | 14 | 2014-01-09 21:06 |
Proof of Primality Test for Fermat Numbers | princeps | Math | 15 | 2012-04-02 21:49 |
PRIMALITY PROOF for Wagstaff numbers! | AntonVrba | Math | 96 | 2009-02-25 10:37 |