![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Mar 2016
22·3·5·7 Posts |
![]()
A peaceful night for you,
do I see it right that 2*2 matrix with determinant 1 build a subgroup in linear algebra and that calculation in the group is better for factoring than calculation in all 2*2 matrix ? Do I see right that the matrix (2 0) (0 -1) has the determinant -2 and that an exponentation with 2*p of Mp mod Mp will result in a matrix with determinant 1 Is it rigth that there are 3 pauli-matrixs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_matrices with determinant 1 and that a parallel multiplication of a start matrix with determinant 1 and a pauli matrix will speed up a possible factorisation ? Would be nice to get a reply. P.S. I do not know why or how, but I am sure we will find the next Mp before next christmas. ![]() ![]() ![]() Last fiddled with by bhelmes on 2021-10-23 at 21:51 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Dec 2012
The Netherlands
71416 Posts |
![]()
Over any commutative ring R, the 2x2 matrices with determinant 1 form a subgroup \(SL_2(R)\)
of the unit group of the ring of all 2x2 matrices. The Pauli matrices have determinant -1, however. It is important to decide carefully which commutative ring R you are working over: the integers, the Gaussian integers, the complex numbers, etc. Some of these can be constructed using matrices: for example, matrices of the form \[ \left(\begin{array}{rr}x & -y \\ y & x\end{array}\right)\] over the real numbers form a copy of the complex numbers. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Feb 2017
Nowhere
623710 Posts |
![]()
Let's see. det(Mk) = (det(M))k.
So if det(M) = -2, det(M2p) = (-2)2p = 22p == 1 (mod 2p - 1). Check. I don't see any relation to factorization. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Mar 2016
1101001002 Posts |
![]() Quote:
(n²+1; n) (n; 1) =(a; b) (c; d) The determinant is one. For n=0 it includes the neutral element concerning the multiplication, is closed under exponentation, means for M^n the elements of b and c are equal and Is closed under multiplication for the element a=1 mod 4. It has obviously an inverse matrix and the multiplication of M*N seems to be kommutativ. It is not clear for me how you calculate the group order of this sub-sub-group if you limit all elements modulo f and limit the multiplication to the exponentation of one M Perhaps someone could correct me and add a little bit more knowledge. Thanks in advance. ![]() ![]() ![]() P.S. I managed to speed up my computer ; 7 days instead 8 days for an exponent at the wawefront. (137 Watt instead 120 Watt) (you could easily speed up the calculation in the bios (Asus mainboard) ) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Feb 2017
Nowhere
34·7·11 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Since M is a real symmetric matrix, it is diagonalizable, with diagonal elements the roots of F(x) = 0. If f = p, a prime number, and gcd(p,D) = 1, then the multiplicative order of M (mod p) divides p - 1 if (D/p) = +1 (quadratic character). Because F(x) is a quadratic with constant term 1, we can say that the multiplicative order divides p + 1 if (D/p) = -1. So we can say that if p does not divide n or n^2 + 4, the multiplicative order (mod p) divides p - (D/p). EDIT: Assuming p does not divide D, we can drop the square factor n^2 from the quadratic residue symbol, and use Last fiddled with by Dr Sardonicus on 2022-02-15 at 15:14 Reason: formatting; and as indicated |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inverse of a particular matrix | preda | Math | 14 | 2020-11-11 10:32 |
Connectivity Matrix | Xyzzy | Lounge | 13 | 2017-02-21 18:29 |
12+256 matrix job | fivemack | Factoring | 11 | 2009-08-18 17:39 |
[Need help] about Matrix Polynomial | buan | Homework Help | 3 | 2007-07-17 15:07 |
CWI Matrix Solver | R.D. Silverman | NFSNET Discussion | 6 | 2006-03-19 17:56 |