mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > CADO-NFS

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-01-30, 21:01   #78
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

22×7×103 Posts
Default

first try with cado, for unconnected's c203
Code:
13966734844620395430991487348745167746919939062454191641301594834859712167254112852425351951454323376159536913937113093639020912129186373021867801289559387189650881337161223227226030924322175928067799243
editing params.c200 tp
Code:
tasks.polyselect.degree = 5 
 
tasks.polyselect.P = 10000 
tasks.polyselect.admin= 5e6 
tasks.polyselect.admax = 7e6 
tasks.polyselect.adrange = 1e3 
tasks.polyselect.incr = 60 
tasks.polyselect.nq = 3125 
tasks.polyselect.nrkeep = 200
Does that seem reasonnable?
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-01-30, 21:16   #79
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

2·52·7·11 Posts
Default

See my answer in the original thread.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-01-31, 15:28   #80
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

148C16 Posts
Default

In preliminary testing, strategy 2 at smaller composites appears to make no discernible difference in memory use, relations returned or time spent. This may allow for less work in rewriting my client scripts.

My concern is that I'm currently running two clients on machines with 8GB. But my solution looks like running one of those with strategy 2 and the other with strategy 0 on a permanent basis. I "think" that will fit, but further testing is needed, of course.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-01-31, 18:07   #81
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

122148 Posts
Default

Well, that didn't work! The clients I tried to add strategy 2 to, crashed trying to run polyselect. This is going to take some more complicated scripts.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-01-31, 19:33   #82
charybdis
 
charybdis's Avatar
 
Apr 2020

929 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdH View Post
Well, that didn't work! The clients I tried to add strategy 2 to, crashed trying to run polyselect. This is going to take some more complicated scripts.
Oh, of course adjust-strategy isn't a valid option for polyselect so it will crash

How about adding tasks.sieve.run = false at the server level to get only polyselect to run, and then for sieving remove it and run clients with --override adjust-strategy 2?

Last fiddled with by charybdis on 2022-01-31 at 19:34
charybdis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-01-31, 23:50   #83
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

22·5·263 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by charybdis View Post
Oh, of course adjust-strategy isn't a valid option for polyselect so it will crash

How about adding tasks.sieve.run = false at the server level to get only polyselect to run, and then for sieving remove it and run clients with --override adjust-strategy 2?
The trouble is that ...run=false doesn't send a 410 to tell the clients to stop, so all commands have to be supplied by the server and I have many clients that aren't going to handle strategy 2. I do already have separate sets of clients that begin for polyselect and las, but the polyselect are never told to stop, so they just keep running.

i will have to think about this a bit. . .
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-01-31, 23:58   #84
charybdis
 
charybdis's Avatar
 
Apr 2020

929 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdH View Post
The trouble is that ...run=false doesn't send a 410 to tell the clients to stop
That feels like an omission/error on the part of the developers. I bet if you dropped them a line on the mailing list you would get a quick fix.
charybdis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-01, 00:48   #85
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

22·5·263 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by charybdis View Post
That feels like an omission/error on the part of the developers. I bet if you dropped them a line on the mailing list you would get a quick fix.
I've thought about doing that for quite some time, but I'm lazy and I figured if nobody else seems to need it, maybe it's just me. I think it would benefit those who use multiple machines for poly searching only, but maybe everyone is using single machines. Perhaps I'll send off an email. I'll think about it a bit.

Thanks!
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-01, 01:31   #86
charybdis
 
charybdis's Avatar
 
Apr 2020

11101000012 Posts
Default

You don't know how many people have asked themselves the same question and thought the same thing

I've run polyselect on many machines before. We're certainly not the only ones. It's probably a 5 minute fix for the developers; I'm sure they won't mind.
charybdis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-01, 03:38   #87
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

22×5×263 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by charybdis View Post
You don't know how many people have asked themselves the same question and thought the same thing

I've run polyselect on many machines before. We're certainly not the only ones. It's probably a 5 minute fix for the developers; I'm sure they won't mind.
Well, I sent a message, but you'll see I went and messed it up. I grabbed a digest and replied to it, forgetting to remove the prior content.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-04-19, 12:07   #88
thornado123
 
Apr 2022

3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
Poly select params posted for C190 and C195. Sieve params are CADO default, and are not optimal.
These params take about 1/3rd the CADO-default time; if you are not impressed with the E-score from your run, double P and run again.
Thanks to user hnoey for extensive testing on a series of C193s to develop these parameters.
Hi

Can I use the C195 parameter file when factoring a 193 cipher number (or should I search for a specific parameter file?)

I am new to this forum and I want to factor a 640-bit integer to prove a point about its security after reading about FAAS (https://github.com/eniac/faas).

I am making my own version of FAAS because theirs aren't functional right now :(

Best regards
thornado123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Posting log files or other text files Xyzzy Forum Feedback 3 2018-12-30 19:37
Improved NFS polynomial selection jasonp Operation Kibibit 5 2014-09-07 11:02
CADO-NFS skan Information & Answers 1 2013-10-22 07:00
could oddperfect's ecm progress page be improved? jasong GMP-ECM 11 2007-05-30 03:08
Factoring progress has really improved! eepiccolo Lone Mersenne Hunters 3 2003-04-12 02:04

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:55.


Mon Feb 6 21:55:47 UTC 2023 up 172 days, 19:24, 1 user, load averages: 1.29, 1.31, 1.22

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔