![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Feb 2020
Germany
1100102 Posts |
![]()
Hi,
I was very lucky and found a triple prime which will make it into the top 10 of Chris Caldwell's prime database with 13389 digits (places 7-9). After a ~24 h run of the +5 form with Primo I estimated the overall runtime to be about 90-100 days with my AMD 3600 6-core CPU. At the moment I am not willing to invest this time on my personal computer. Thus I am curious if someone with significant computing power is interested in helping out with the Primo certificate and sharing the credit. regards hunson |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jan 2007
Germany
1111010112 Posts |
![]()
Congratulation !
100 days ist not true. I estimate (1,33^3,75)*6,22d * (3GHz*8Core)/(3,6GHz*6Core) =3 weeks ,100% CPU nonstop 6,22 days based on Ryzen 7 1700 8 Core 3 GHz for a 10k number under Primo 4, Ubuntu greetings Norman Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2022-03-05 at 09:45 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Feb 2020
Germany
2·52 Posts |
![]()
Mh, 3 weeks would be OK to invest.
I did my estimate based on the certificate of this number with 11637 digits: https://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=132373 The overall Primo certification took 8056345s (no CPU cores mentioned). Edited After ~82000s of runtime Primo was at 43708/44477 bits. I am running Ubuntu in a VM because my machine runs on Win. Maybe I am loosing to much computing power due to the virtualization? Last fiddled with by hunson on 2022-03-05 at 10:04 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Jan 2007
Germany
1EB16 Posts |
![]()
Based on this number I get with my Ryzen 7 1700:
(1,16^3,75)*7,22d = 12,6d. In the certificate we read: 719077s = 8,3d. Sounds like a 12 Core Ryzen ! Addition: 6993977s (single) / 620250s (full) = 11,2....should be a 12 Core CPU Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2022-03-05 at 10:06 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Jan 2007
Germany
491 Posts |
![]()
Phase 1:
(43708/44477)^3,75 = 0,93 -> 7% done Total Phase 1: 14 days Phase 2: most 25% of Phase 1 -> 3 days Should be done in 3 weeks over all....is not slower under VM |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Feb 2020
Germany
2·52 Posts |
![]()
Could you explain your calculations? Especially the exponent 3.75, where does this come from?
Last fiddled with by hunson on 2022-03-05 at 16:10 Reason: typo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Jan 2007
Germany
491 Posts |
![]()
Yes, 3.75 is a fix parameter and a consequence of many runningtimes we can study.
E.g. double the number of digits, you have 2^3.75 ~ 13 times to wait, or the downrun of bits of a number to 50% (example 20000/40000), so phase 1 is 92.3% done, 10000/40000 is 99,5% done and so on. Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2022-03-05 at 16:29 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
107910 Posts |
![]()
If you still want help, I'd glad to assist here. It will take me two or three days.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Jan 2007
Germany
7538 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
13×83 Posts |
![]()
Unfortunately, no.
![]() But my 16 core is rather quick with these. After giving it a second thought, two days will not be possible (most likely), so three days is my guess. My offer stands. Paul said (IIRC) that he found a way to split stage 2 onto multiple machines? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Jan 2007
Germany
1111010112 Posts |
![]()
Ah okay, so 16 cores need 10-12 days...my guess.
Stage 2 on several machines ? ... yes its possible but for a 13k number it is only a tiny plus. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Triple prime search | hunson | Information & Answers | 19 | 2021-12-05 14:51 |
How does one prove that a mersenne prime found with CUDALucas is really prime? | ICWiener | Software | 38 | 2018-06-09 13:59 |
What computer is needed for a prime search | enzocreti | Programming | 4 | 2018-06-06 08:43 |
Mersenne Prime Found? No. | houding | PrimeNet | 4 | 2014-09-21 15:32 |
Prime found | paulunderwood | 3*2^n-1 Search | 61 | 2008-04-22 12:19 |