mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data > Marin's Mersenne-aries

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-07-23, 03:58   #595
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
Ͳօɾօղէօ

5×563 Posts
Default

Queued these:

DoubleCheck=82948039,76,1
DoubleCheck=82952587,76,1
DoubleCheck=82988863,76,1

Should be done in a month.
Mark Rose is offline  
Old 2020-07-24, 18:35   #596
Runtime Error
 
Sep 2017
USA

27 Posts
Default

I took these as LL-DC. Given that there are already two [non-matching] LL results, the probability that I also mismatch is likely less than the PRP-VDF overhead, right? I suppose it probably makes sense to continue the Triple Check list as LL.

Quote:
DoubleCheck=87815327,76,1
DoubleCheck=87829211,76,1

DoubleCheck=88053461,76,1
DoubleCheck=88303121,76,1
DoubleCheck=88303129,76,1

DoubleCheck=89223679,76,1
DoubleCheck=89224147,76,1
DoubleCheck=89833343,76,1
PS: Thank you for splitting off the PRP-VDF and DC thread, although it seems to have devolved into a thread about patches. Anyway, it is a very exciting development!
Runtime Error is offline  
Old 2020-07-24, 18:50   #597
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

203308 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runtime Error View Post
Given that there are already two [non-matching] LL results, the probability that I also mismatch is likely less than the PRP-VDF overhead, right? I suppose it probably makes sense to continue the Triple Check list as LL.
I concur doctor.
Uncwilly is offline  
Old 2020-07-25, 03:29   #598
Runtime Error
 
Sep 2017
USA

12810 Posts
Default

@UNCwilly

Hey, I just realized this one 87829211 is a PRP TC instead of LL. I restarted my worker as PRP-VDF, only 10M iterations wasted. Is there an easy way to query the list for those that are PRP and not LL, in case there are more? Thanks in advance.
Runtime Error is offline  
Old 2020-07-25, 04:32   #599
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

100000110110002 Posts
Default

I searched the upper list and moved a few down to a lower post. I also found some that were done. I started in on the lower part of the list and have note found any. I found some that were done.
Uncwilly is offline  
Old 2020-07-25, 12:27   #600
ChZ
 
Feb 2019

111012 Posts
Post

Requesting triple-check:

DoubleCheck=57359399,75,1
ChZ is offline  
Old 2020-07-31, 19:27   #601
Viliam Furik
 
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia

83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP2 View Post
PRP checks. Note: please use V30 for these.

Code:
PRP=1,284946391,-1,76,0,3,1
PRP=1,284963899,-1,76,0,3,1
PRP=1,286291299,-1,76,0,3,1
PRP=1,286793229,-1,76,0,3,1
PRP=1,286793251,-1,76,0,3,1
.
Shouldn't different PRP residue types produce different residues?
Viliam Furik is offline  
Old 2020-07-31, 20:13   #602
kruoli
 
kruoli's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE

23×31 Posts
Default

Some residue types will result in the same residue when there is no factor. But in general, you are correct. But nonetheless, we need a matching DC as long as we do not have a VDF on a run.
kruoli is offline  
Old 2020-07-31, 20:19   #603
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

23×1,051 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viliam Furik View Post
Shouldn't different PRP residue types produce different residues?
I am not sure. The worktodo lines (and I fixed the missing ",") I made followed ATH's info. Each of the exponents have a base 3, type 1 test.
The exponents were part of ATH's list that was posted in the TC list. I went through the list to remove them from the LL's.

As far as I understand the server is ready to receive the VDFs. I have been running PRP-CF's with VDFs and not seeing evil messages from the server.
Uncwilly is offline  
Old 2020-07-31, 21:19   #604
Viliam Furik
 
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia

83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kruoli View Post
Some residue types will result in the same residue when there is no factor. But in general, you are correct. But nonetheless, we need a matching DC as long as we do not have a VDF on a run.
Citation from undoc.txt of Prime95:
Code:
PRP supports 5 types of residues for compatibility with other PRP programs.  If
a is the PRP base and N is the number being tested, then the residue types are:
1 = 64-bit residue of a^(N-1), a traditional Fermat PRP test used by most other programs
2 = 64-bit residue of a^((N-1)/2)
3 = 64-bit residue of a^(N+1), only available if b=2
4 = 64-bit residue of a^((N+1)/2), only available if b=2
5 = 64-bit residue of a^(N*known_factors-1), same as type 1 if there are no known factors
To control which residue type is generated, use this setting in prime.txt:
	PRPResidueType=n		(default is 5)
The residue type can also be set for PRP tests in worktodo.txt entries making
this option somewhat obsolete.
Based on this, only the types 1 and 5 should yield the same results.
Viliam Furik is offline  
Old 2020-08-01, 14:16   #605
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

5×577 Posts
Default

This one needs a TC: 53301539

But it will be picked up automatically at any time probably.
ATH is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Posts that seem less than useless, or something like that jasong Forum Feedback 1050 2019-04-29 00:50
Posts in limbo 10metreh Forum Feedback 6 2013-01-10 09:50
Ton of spam posts jasonp Forum Feedback 9 2009-07-19 17:35
Exponents assigned to me but not processed yet? edorajh Data 10 2003-11-18 11:26
2000 posts! Xyzzy Lounge 10 2002-11-21 00:04

All times are UTC. The time now is 06:11.

Mon Aug 10 06:11:05 UTC 2020 up 24 days, 1:57, 2 users, load averages: 1.92, 1.52, 1.41

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.