mersenneforum.org Lucas Table
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2012-04-17, 11:42 #1 R.D. Silverman     Nov 2003 22·5·373 Posts Lucas Table Does anyone have the factorization of L1058? Blair Kelly's web page says that L1061 is the first hole, yet the actual table listing the factorizations lists L1058 as having a C195 cofactor. Or is the assertion that L1061 is the first hole incorrect?
 2012-04-17, 11:46 #2 firejuggler     Apr 2010 Over the rainbow 37×71 Posts Perhaps Blair Kelly consider L1061 the first hole because the composite factor is slightly smaller (c184) than the composite factor of L1058 (c195)? Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 2012-04-17 at 11:48
2012-04-17, 11:58   #3
R.D. Silverman

Nov 2003

22×5×373 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by firejuggler Perhaps Blair Kelly consider L1061 the first hole because the composite factor is slightly smaller (c184) than the composite factor of L1058 (c195)?
No. Blair would not make that mistake.

2012-04-17, 11:58   #4
rajula

"Tapio Rajala"
Feb 2010
Finland

32×5×7 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by firejuggler Perhaps Blair Kelly consider L1061 the first hole because the composite factor is slightly smaller (c184) than the composite factor of L1058 (c195)?
That would be really strange concept of "first hole". Also, there are other composite factors of Lucas numbers that are smaller than the c184 of L1061.

Last fiddled with by rajula on 2012-04-17 at 12:00

 2012-04-17, 12:08 #5 firejuggler     Apr 2010 Over the rainbow 1010010000112 Posts Then, maybe a mistake. Everybody make mistake sometimes. Or he/(she?) has just finished the factorisation and hasn't uploaded the result. Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 2012-04-17 at 12:13
2012-04-17, 12:17   #6
R.D. Silverman

Nov 2003

22×5×373 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by firejuggler Then, maybe a mistake. Everybody make mistake sometimes. Or he/(she?) has just finished the factorisation and hasn't uploaded the result.
It is far more likely that the full factorization of L1058 was simply
not entered into the table.

Does anyone have it?

2012-04-17, 15:26   #7
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter

Jun 2011
Thailand

3×3,251 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman Does anyone have the factorization of L1058? Blair Kelly's web page says that L1061 is the first hole, yet the actual table listing the factorizations lists L1058 as having a C195 cofactor. Or is the assertion that L1061 is the first hole incorrect?
Oh, Mr Silverman, how about doing your homework before posting such ignorant questions here.... You were just a click away from the truth from Mr Kelly's web page....

(edit: gotcha! I will laugh 5 weeks in a row !!! ha ha ha ha ha ha...")

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2012-04-17 at 15:32

2012-04-17, 15:36   #8
axn

Jun 2003

53·41 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaurV Oh, Mr Silverman, how about doing your homework before posting such ignorant questions here.... You were just a click away from the truth from Mr Kelly's web page....
RDS was talking about the discrepancy between the web page (http://mersennus.net/fibonacci/index.html) and the data tables (what you posted).

2012-04-17, 15:51   #9
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter

Jun 2011
Thailand

3·3,251 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by axn RDS was talking about the discrepancy between the web page (http://mersennus.net/fibonacci/index.html) and the data tables (what you posted).
Sorry, can't reply to that, I am still shaking from laugh and barely can find the keys

2012-04-17, 16:54   #10
R.D. Silverman

Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaurV Oh, Mr Silverman, how about doing your homework before posting such ignorant questions here.... You were just a click away from the truth from Mr Kelly's web page.... (edit: gotcha! I will laugh 5 weeks in a row !!! ha ha ha ha ha ha...")
The entry for L1058 is new. It was NOT there when I checked the very
list of composites that you pointed to.

2012-04-17, 16:59   #11
R.D. Silverman

Nov 2003

22×5×373 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman The entry for L1058 is new. It was NOT there when I checked the very list of composites that you pointed to.
In particular, see:

http://mersennus.net/fibonacci/status2000.html

L1058 is still not listed.

and:

http://mersennus.net/fibonacci/

says quite explicitly that L1061 is the first hole.

It seems that there is inconsistency among the tables. Sean seems
misinformed as well. He is doing the Lucas numbers in order but skipped
over L1058.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post garo Cunningham Tables 75 2021-01-31 16:16 garo Cunningham Tables 86 2021-01-04 22:35 garo Cunningham Tables 80 2021-01-04 22:33 garo Cunningham Tables 164 2021-01-04 22:32 garo Cunningham Tables 54 2019-02-05 20:35

All times are UTC. The time now is 02:44.

Sat Sep 25 02:44:36 UTC 2021 up 63 days, 21:13, 0 users, load averages: 5.85, 4.97, 4.00