20211224, 20:43  #1 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
1CC6_{16} Posts 
Let's finish DC of old "dubious" claims of primes
Of the roughly 90 "dubious" claims exponents, I have the following as not yet having a factor found, matching DC or TC, or PRP with proof & successful cert.
Code:
PRP=1,2,86225219,1,76,0 PRP=1,2,87232913,1,76,0 PRP=1,2,89023807,1,76,0 PRP=1,2,96532433,1,76,0 PRP=1,2,97970567,1,76,0 PRP=1,2,103404713,1,76,0 PRP=1,2,108575167,1,77,0 PRP=1,2,110000017,1,78,0 PRP=1,2,122628553,1,78,0 PRP=1,2,137362691,1,80,0 PRP=1,2,231695603,1,79,0 PRP=1,2,276036017,1,80,0 PRP=1,2,285754177,1,80,0 PRP=1,2,315690521,1,80,0 PRP=1,2,333333223,1,81,0 PRP=1,2,369452123,1,81,0 PRP=1,2,852348659,1,86,0 Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20211224 at 20:43 
20211224, 21:35  #2 
Mar 2019
2·163 Posts 
Why do these exponents deserve special attention, just because someone made a claim about them? (in other words: don't feed the trolls).

20211224, 23:15  #3 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
10891_{10} Posts 
Those from the "Guess Mxx" threads should usually be taken with 10g NaCl crystals.

20211225, 01:40  #4 
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
2^{4}×5×11 Posts 

20211225, 01:52  #5  
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2×29×127 Posts 
Overlap is rare.
M852348659 appeared elsewhere and was classified as a dubious claim first, before someone entered it in the predict m52 thread, so it is not counted again in the predict m52 total. I found no other overlap between my dubious claim DC list in post 1 and the predictMxx lists on my server share (M45, M49, M50, M51, M52). Predict Mn guesses are not counted again if reused in Mo (o>n) guesses, in the counts I occasionally update. Quote:
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20211225 at 02:15 

20211225, 02:11  #6  
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
2^{4}×5×11 Posts 
Quote:
A horse can only be declared lost if the result is a certified composite. In addition, there are barely around 90 of them, not 9,000. Maybe UncWilly should add this rule to the Mxx thread, exponent guesses must not be greater than 4x the size of the exponent of the current largest known Mersenne Prime or 3x the size of the exponent of the current wavefront milestone, whichever one is larger, but it's up to UncWilly to decide. A lot of complains have been generated because someone places down a large guess in the M800M+ or M900M+ ranges which will take around a year or 2 to test the exponent, there can be an easy fix to this. Is this what you've meant the trolls? Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 20211225 at 03:08 

20211225, 03:07  #7 
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
1A19_{16} Posts 
There is no obligation to test exponents the others have suggested. So there are no grounds for complaints IMO.
If you want to test them then go ahead. Else leave it to the person suggesting to test their own exponents. If you don't like the their suggestion then just ignore it and carry on with whatever are your own preferred exponents. 
20211225, 10:50  #8 
"University student"
May 2021
Beijing, China
2^{2}·67 Posts 

20211225, 12:54  #10 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
16306_{8} Posts 
I'm running PRP=1,2,86225219,1,76,0 on gpuowl on a Radeon VII, which should take ~16 hours. Can't register it because of the old LLDC reservation lingering for years.
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20211225 at 12:56 
20211227, 23:11  #11  
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2·29·127 Posts 
Updated list
Most of these I did a first test on, so the server won't issue DC to me.
Quote:
Code:
PRP=1,2,87232913,1,76,0 PRP=1,2,96532433,1,76,0 I have reserved this one PRP=1,2,97970567,1,76,0 PRP=1,2,103404713,1,76,0 PRP=1,2,108575167,1,77,0 PRP=1,2,110000017,1,78,0 PRP=1,2,122628553,1,78,0 I have reserved this one PRP=1,2,231695603,1,79,0 PRP=1,2,276036017,1,80,0 PRP=1,2,285754177,1,80,0 PRP=1,2,315690521,1,80,0 PRP=1,2,333333223,1,81,0 I have reserved this one PRP=1,2,369452123,1,81,0 PRP=1,2,852348659,1,86,0 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
"Mixed Sierpinski conjecture base 5" proven!! (if probable primes allowed)  sweety439  sweety439  1  20201221 14:08 
Is "mung" or "munged" a negative word in a moral sense?  Uncwilly  Lounge  15  20200414 18:35 
AouessareEl HaddouchiEssaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!"  wildrabbitt  Miscellaneous Math  11  20150306 08:17 
Palindrome primes (a.k.a. Elementary S03E03 "Just a Regular Irregular")  Batalov  And now for something completely different  12  20141116 19:03 
Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier?  nitai1999  Software  7  20040826 18:12 