![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3·7·167 Posts |
![]()
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q...id&FORM=HDRSC2
I'm watching a lot of first amendment audit videos(US videos, free speech amendment) and sometimes people are accused of standing too close, which can be hard to determine with a fisheye video. I'm looking for a picture that basically shows me mathematically, how far away stuff is. Optimally, I'd like to have a fisheye shape I could just put over a Youtube video, but I know that's a rainbows and unicorns type dream. Have a nice day. :) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Feb 2017
Nowhere
24×389 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
DB316 Posts |
![]() Quote:
The way I see it, and maybe I'm wrong, but if a camera says it does, say, 170 degrees, and it's a 16:9 image, I would think someone with the proper knowledge and software could simulate that. I don't have the knowledge for that,so I'm playing the role of a beggar. :) It's not a huge deal for me, maybe it's harder than I think. Tbh, I was hoping I was simply using the wrong Google terms. I've seen some of the images on Google, and I'm simply looking for one where the point of view is at the center of the ellipse(?) going out. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
252158 Posts |
![]()
Different cameras have different 'fisheye' lenses. The distortions are different. The angle covered by the lens is not a guarantee of the same representation on the image. Some lenses are more akin to a true panoramic, while others have a high drop-off on the sides. Also, they don't have to have the same rotational symmetry (up-down vs left-right can be different curves). Further, the sensor or film can be shaped to change the effect.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
1101101100112 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I think most of the distortion would be going from a spherical image to a flat screen, so even regular tv is distorted. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Feb 2017
Nowhere
185016 Posts |
![]() Quote:
If you are instead concerned with undoing the distortions caused by a lens, then as already indicated by other posters, it depends on the specific lens. I suggest a Google search with parameters "fisheye lens correction" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Sep 2009
2×1,213 Posts |
![]() Quote:
A photograph is just one 2D image, so you have a lot more ambiguity to worry about. Chris |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
22·5·503 Posts |
![]()
An image, ha! Even a video is not going to tell you the truth:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
92016 Posts |
![]()
Another case and point.
ETA, sorry my video does not upload. I get the message it's invalid. Last fiddled with by a1call on 2019-07-02 at 23:21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
22×5×503 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Simply google for "The Mysterious Floating Orb" (add Yankovic if needed. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
44408 Posts |
![]()
I can see your video, no problem. I was trying to upload a video of the object created by the Japanese mathematician.
Here is an article about the object. The video is from the cylinders turning to diamond shape. https://www.insider.com/optical-illu...atician-2018-5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can Mersenne composites share "shape"? | jnml | Miscellaneous Math | 31 | 2018-01-01 01:55 |
3ds camera games:need help with search terms | jasong | jasong | 0 | 2013-11-29 18:14 |
Shape of a CUDA lattice siever | fivemack | Programming | 2 | 2012-12-16 01:07 |
Confusing terms/acronyms? | Uncwilly | Lounge | 0 | 2010-12-29 01:27 |
We're #3 in terms of number of primes found! | MooooMoo | Twin Prime Search | 35 | 2007-11-04 07:11 |