![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2·7·461 Posts |
![]()
It looks as if the value and the format string got muddled up, and so the X axis labels all read '0f'
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Apr 2013
Germany
2·3·53 Posts |
![]()
I noticed that too but only for sequences that do not reach a size of 100.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
1183910 Posts |
![]() Quote:
What is the significance of sequence 7980424322874? I added ~90 iterations to this sequence while running it up to 104 digits. It did not fix the big graph. I did drop the 2*3 driver ![]() My guess is that it would have to hit 105 digits to fix the big graph since that would add an additional "line" to the graph. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Nov 2012
23·32 Posts |
![]()
It passed 105 digits. No change in the graph labels.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Broken aliquot sequences | fivemack | FactorDB | 46 | 2021-02-21 10:46 |
Factordb and aliquot sequences with useless size terms | garambois | Aliquot Sequences | 10 | 2017-09-02 00:21 |
Broken sequences / duplicate entries | Syd | FactorDB | 33 | 2014-03-20 12:33 |
Broken aliquot sequences | schickel | FactorDB | 18 | 2013-06-12 16:09 |
Aliquot sequence worker for factordb | yoyo | FactorDB | 6 | 2012-01-12 20:58 |