![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
149D16 Posts |
![]()
I seem to recall someone mentioning a few months ago that running Windows in Safe Mode allows Prime95 to run faster...
Just for fun I tried it today with surprisingly good results: My PIV 2.8 Ghz per iteration time for a 26M exponent dropped from 0.064 to 0.059 seconds ... about 8% faster!!! Any reason why I (or anyone else with a Prime95 dedicated PC) shouldn't do the same for all such PCs? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
5×2,179 Posts |
![]()
I would, if I was going to be gone for a day or more. That is provided the machine will not need the net. I figured once that with my Athalon, a shut down and boot to safe mode before bedtime, then reboot once getting home from work, would have a net benefit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22·3·641 Posts |
![]() Quote:
It takes noticeable CPU time to do all those nonessential un-safe Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2009-03-24 at 05:24 Reason: Re-did the Alfonso Bedoya homage. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3·1,759 Posts |
![]() Quote:
BTW the stats were NOT a blip....it ran over-night in Safe Mode and maintained the 0.059 pace. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Jul 2008
San Francisco, CA
3×67 Posts |
![]()
I just tried this on my OC'd core 2 quad (Q6600) and I didn't see any improvement. I'll try to run it longer and see if anything changes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3·1,759 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Maybe if your machine is newer (hence junk free) then there might be no clutter for SafeMode to eliminate ![]() I'm going to try it on my new (though refurbished) and junk free PIV next. Last fiddled with by petrw1 on 2009-03-24 at 17:15 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
10111100011112 Posts |
![]()
i have heard mixed results with this
i have even heard slower for some reason i think be careful though having connection to the internet without virus protection could mean problems |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3×1,759 Posts |
![]()
Maybe I am uninformed but I thought "SafeMode" was Safe and kept out pretty much everything??????
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
37·163 Posts |
![]() Quote:
it boots basically just the operating system without even unnecessary drivers and services an antivirus program will not be started |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3×1,759 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Now if I am in a home network with a build in HW/SW firewall then nothing should get in unless I "invite" it by going to the wrong site and the wrong time?? OR am I wrong again. Maybe the only "safe" thing to do is stay our of safemode or while in it unplug the network cable or NOT start the network and reboot in regular mode now and then to get/send to V5. Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
37·163 Posts |
![]() Quote:
i wouldnt surf the internet while in safe mode unless i needed to though |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is libecm thread-safe? | frmky | GMP-ECM | 5 | 2009-02-28 16:08 |
Prime95 in Safe Mode on Win98SE | Unregistered | Software | 3 | 2006-06-07 04:51 |
Safe Mode/High Priority | A_Pryme | Software | 12 | 2005-02-13 19:22 |
Safe Mode | Unregistered | Software | 12 | 2004-07-16 01:06 |
Safe Mode | JuanTutors | Hardware | 6 | 2004-06-24 10:15 |