mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Lone Mersenne Hunters > LMH > 100M

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-11-26, 05:56   #45
CADavis
 
CADavis's Avatar
 
Jul 2005
Des Moines, Iowa, USA

101010102 Posts
Default

starting again with 332216147 - 332217971, most are to 68 already, going to take the range to 72 first, then 72 - 74. the first few are assigned to LL testers already so should I bother with those at all? http://v5www.mersenne.org/report_exp...&B1=Get+status

Last fiddled with by CADavis on 2008-11-26 at 06:03
CADavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-26, 06:43   #46
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

76D16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CADavis View Post
the first few are assigned to LL testers already so should I bother with those at all? http://v5www.mersenne.org/report_exp...&B1=Get+status
I think that once an exponent is assigned by the V5 server none other than the assignee should touch it. Of course in the 100 000 000 digit primes range some of the assignees will skip trialfactoring in the misunderstanding that they will go quicker. I still think it is better to just wait until they drop out.

Jacob
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-01, 03:55   #47
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

10,891 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S485122 View Post
I think that once an exponent is assigned by the V5 server none other than the assignee should touch it. Of course in the 100 000 000 digit primes range some of the assignees will skip trialfactoring in the misunderstanding that they will go quicker. I still think it is better to just wait until they drop out.
If they show no progress after the number has been assigned to them for 15-30, I think that it is likely that they have skipped the TF.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-01, 06:17   #48
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

35558 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
If they show no progress after the number has been assigned to them for 15-30, I think that it is likely that they have skipped the TF.
likely

You are not sure and thus may be poaching. There is no urgency to treat those numbers. Even if it might be fun to search for the work ;-)

Jacob

Last fiddled with by S485122 on 2008-12-01 at 06:20 Reason: added phrase to be more explicit.
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-01, 08:05   #49
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

769210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
If they show no progress after the number has been assigned to them for 15-30, I think that it is likely that they have skipped the TF.
I'll echo Jacob (though more softly and verbosely).

When one tries to deduce what is going on in an assignee's system, one runs the risk of having one's invalid assumptions about what is and is not shown in the reports lead one to a false conclusion.

That was doubly true in my own case.

Several years ago, the nonstandard way in which I was processing my LL assignments may have made it appear to someone looking at PrimeNet reports that I would be "holding up" some milestones, but in fact I was careful not to do that.

Then, the way in which someone else reported LL results to PrimeNet for exponents that had been assigned to me made it appear to me that the person was deliberately poaching my assignments. However, after I recently established communication with that person, he emphatically assured me that he did nothing of the sort, and had tested only exponents that had been properly assigned to him. That made me realize that I had not previously considered the possibility that all the evidence I had could be explained by some flaw in the assignment system rather than by poaching.

So, please don't do anything on exponents that are assigned to someone else. There are an infinity of Mersenne numbers with prime exponents, enough for everyone to work on exclusively with plenty left over.

Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2008-12-01 at 08:10
cheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-21, 05:35   #50
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

10,891 Posts
Default

I have taken the advice of others to heart. I now grab the factor level report, make the worktodo.add, let Prime95 register assignments, then cull the N/A's.

Here is a progress status report for the range from 332192831 to 332259937

Code:
Date					12/20/2008
Average bit depth for first 100 expos	72.17
Average bit depth for first 1000 expos	69.23
100th active expo (no factor found)	332197793
1000th active expo (no factor found)	332240201
Unitless total effort number		1556864
Number of first 100 exos to 2^71	72
Number of first 1000 exos to 2^70	370
Code:
Bit	# to bit level or higher  
65	1482  <-all left in range
66	1234
67	1233
68	710
69	500
70	370
71	219
72	187
73	119
74	83
75	43
76	1
77	1
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	100mstatus20081220.gif
Views:	355
Size:	14.6 KB
ID:	3048  
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-23, 14:23   #51
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

1,901 Posts
Default

Code:
Exponent Range    Composite  Unproven  Assigned       Available			
Start      Count  F          NO-LL     TF   P-1  LL   TF
332000000  51080  27401      23679     648  1    653  22398
This shows that 21 assignments are overlapping (Unproven -Assigned-Available)

Jacob
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-12-23, 23:32   #52
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

10,891 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S485122 View Post
This shows that 21 assignments are overlapping (Unproven -Assigned-Available)
I think that there are some expos that the server shows as assigned to me to LL, that are actually left over TF's. I want to get my hands on the machine and look at the worktodo.txt. I want to make sure that the entries are right, or fix them, or.... I haven't figured out how it happened. They may be part of the 21.

That and maybe the ones that got assigned LL, but TF killed, as reported previously.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-09, 05:16   #53
MercPrime
 
MercPrime's Avatar
 
Jan 2009
1/n

3·7 Posts
Default

Hey UncWilly, I'll join in when I'm done with my poking around below your range (321M 6-9 range).
MercPrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-21, 03:14   #54
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

10,891 Posts
Default

Here is a progress status report for the range from 332192831 to 332259937

Code:
Date					01/20/2008
Average bit depth for first 100 expos	72.69
Average bit depth for first 1000 expos	70.09
100th active expo (no factor found)	332197793
1000th active expo (no factor found)	332240677
Unitless total effort number		2309376 (accounts for only the 1st 1000 expos)
Number of first 100 exos to 2^71	96
Number of first 1000 exos to 2^70	394
Code:
Bit	# to bit level or higher  
67	1461  <-all left in range
68	1300
69	766
70	394
71	310
72	249
73	170
74	120
75	81
76	2
77	1
Some of my cores have been sidelined from this due to lack of access. They are still working for GIMPS. I have put one new core to working the range above this. It is a slower one and I will keep it at the lower bit depths. Once I get all the exponents in this range to 2^68, I will put that core onto the next higher area, bringing those expos up to 67 then 68. I plan on reviving the other cores and have then work the 69-72 area for this range.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	100mstatus20090120.gif
Views:	374
Size:	18.3 KB
ID:	3222  
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-01-21, 23:01   #55
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

1089110 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
Here is a progress status report for the range from 332192831 to 332259937
I am now extending this particular range up to 332319979. The next stats (2/20) will reflect that. Anyone wanting to help can either work above me or take some of the higher bit levels.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPU72 / MISFIT use for 100M digit range? Uncwilly GPU to 72 64 2013-03-31 02:45
I want a 100M digit Mersenne that.... JuanTutors PrimeNet 8 2012-12-06 13:47
How far along are you in your 100M digit LL test? JuanTutors Lounge 6 2012-02-21 07:36
100M-digit n/k pairs __HRB__ Riesel Prime Search 0 2010-05-22 01:17
100M digit prime Unregistered Information & Answers 10 2010-03-24 20:16

All times are UTC. The time now is 06:05.


Sun Jan 29 06:05:18 UTC 2023 up 164 days, 3:33, 0 users, load averages: 1.99, 1.63, 1.31

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔