20081114, 22:44  #34 
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
5^{2}·211 Posts 

20081116, 05:19  #35 
Jul 2005
Des Moines, Iowa, USA
2·5·17 Posts 
I think I'm changing my mind a bit. I figured out how to use the Factoring Effort page to make a worktodo file, and I think I want to do a wide range to lower levels.
So what I'm thinking now is to take my current range to 68 bits, then to 70 bits (maybe not though), then start on a new range from 61  64 bits the new range will be starting at 332900021 and eventually go to 332999959, which is all only done to 61 bits. what do you think, Uncwilly? 
20081116, 06:45  #36 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
10,891 Posts 
Fair enough. I haven't been tracking that area at the moment.
I am currently trying to clear areas ahead of the LL'ers. I have a few cores doing expos (even those assigned, but showing no signs of more TF) up to 73. It looks like someone found a factor up in the 73 bit range. :) 
20081119, 06:28  #37 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts 
I've found the usernames of two 100M digit LL testers:
simcon M332193833 and M332193859 jr007j M332194253 and M332194277 
20081119, 19:06  #38 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2A8B_{16} Posts 

20081121, 06:35  #39 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
10,891 Posts 
Here is a progress status report for the range from 332192831 to 332259937
Code:
Date 11/20/2008 Average bit depth for first 100 expos 71.46 Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 67.96 100th active expo (no factor found) 332197793 1000th active expo (no factor found) 332239723 Unitless total effort number 813536 Number of first 100 exos to 2^71 45 Number of first 1000 exos to 2^70 275 Code:
Bit # to bit level or higher 61 1527 62 1259 63 1258 64 1258 65 900 66 849 67 836 68 571 69 280 70 275 71 107 72 84 73 72 74 48 75 10 76 1 77 1 
20081122, 20:29  #40 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
4,073 Posts 
I grabbed M332203901 a couple weeks ago. So far I've completed TF from 2^712^75, as I write this P1_stage1 is 60% done (P1 both stages should be done around 10Dec, then I'll (probably) let it continue TF up to 2^77, which will take me into Feb2009(?). I'll unreserve it once it gets to LL time; I don't have the patience to wait until May 2013 to confirm it's not prime

20081122, 20:50  #41 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
4,073 Posts 
I noticed that M332252939 to M332292827 have currently only been TF'd to 2^61, so I figured it would only take me about 12 hours to bring those 1000 exponents up to 2^63, so probably by the time anyone reads this they'll all be at 2^63. Hopefully I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.

20081123, 12:30  #42 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
111111101001_{2} Posts 

20081124, 00:42  #43  
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
10101010001011_{2} Posts 
Quote:
I generally peek at the exponent status report to see if it has been assigned (and then if it has shown activity, a lot of the LL'ers have shown no progress on the supporting TF or P1). Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 20081124 at 00:46 

20081126, 05:47  #44 
Jul 2005
Des Moines, Iowa, USA
2·5·17 Posts 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
GPU72 / MISFIT use for 100M digit range?  Uncwilly  GPU to 72  64  20130331 02:45 
I want a 100M digit Mersenne that....  JuanTutors  PrimeNet  8  20121206 13:47 
How far along are you in your 100M digit LL test?  JuanTutors  Lounge  6  20120221 07:36 
100Mdigit n/k pairs  __HRB__  Riesel Prime Search  0  20100522 01:17 
100M digit prime  Unregistered  Information & Answers  10  20100324 20:16 