mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Lone Mersenne Hunters > LMH > 100M

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-11-14, 22:44   #34
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

52·211 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CADavis View Post
Yeah I switched to Vista 64-bit and it's going approx. twice as fast :-)
Is there a way to make the benchmark go to 74bit factors?
Whoo Hoo I just ordered a new Q9550 with Vista64 ... due Tuesday.

Watch me factor now.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-16, 05:19   #35
CADavis
 
CADavis's Avatar
 
Jul 2005
Des Moines, Iowa, USA

2·5·17 Posts
Default

I think I'm changing my mind a bit. I figured out how to use the Factoring Effort page to make a worktodo file, and I think I want to do a wide range to lower levels.

So what I'm thinking now is to take my current range to 68 bits, then to 70 bits (maybe not though), then start on a new range from 61 - 64 bits

the new range will be starting at 332900021 and eventually go to 332999959, which is all only done to 61 bits.

what do you think, Uncwilly?
CADavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-16, 06:45   #36
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

10,891 Posts
Default

Fair enough. I haven't been tracking that area at the moment.


I am currently trying to clear areas ahead of the LL'ers. I have a few cores doing expos (even those assigned, but showing no signs of more TF) up to 73.


It looks like someone found a factor up in the 73 bit range. :)
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-19, 06:28   #37
jinydu
 
jinydu's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48

2·3·293 Posts
Default

I've found the usernames of two 100M digit LL testers:

simcon M332193833 and M332193859
jr007j M332194253 and M332194277
jinydu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-19, 19:06   #38
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

2A8B16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jinydu View Post
I've found the usernames of two 100M digit LL testers:

simcon M332193833 and M332193859
jr007j M332194253 and M332194277
There are several others that have expos assigned to them. Some are active, some seem not to be.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-21, 06:35   #39
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

10,891 Posts
Default

Here is a progress status report for the range from 332192831 to 332259937

Code:
Date					11/20/2008
Average bit depth for first 100 expos	71.46
Average bit depth for first 1000 expos	67.96
100th active expo (no factor found)	332197793
1000th active expo (no factor found)	332239723
Unitless total effort number		813536
Number of first 100 exos to 2^71	45
Number of first 1000 exos to 2^70	275
Code:
Bit	# to bit level or higher  
61	1527
62	1259
63	1258
64	1258
65	900
66	849
67	836
68	571
69	280
70	275
71	107
72	84
73	72
74	48
75	10
76	1
77	1
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	100mstatus.gif
Views:	385
Size:	30.8 KB
ID:	2944  
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-22, 20:29   #40
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

4,073 Posts
Default

I grabbed M332203901 a couple weeks ago. So far I've completed TF from 2^71-2^75, as I write this P-1_stage1 is 60% done (P-1 both stages should be done around 10-Dec, then I'll (probably) let it continue TF up to 2^77, which will take me into Feb2009(?). I'll unreserve it once it gets to LL time; I don't have the patience to wait until May 2013 to confirm it's not prime
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-22, 20:50   #41
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

4,073 Posts
Default

I noticed that M332252939 to M332292827 have currently only been TF'd to 2^61, so I figured it would only take me about 12 hours to bring those 1000 exponents up to 2^63, so probably by the time anyone reads this they'll all be at 2^63. Hopefully I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-23, 12:30   #42
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

1111111010012 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
I noticed that M332252939 to M332292827 have currently only been TF'd to 2^61
1000 exponents TF'd to 2^63; 37 factors found.
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-24, 00:42   #43
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

101010100010112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
I noticed that M332252939 to M332292827 have currently only been TF'd to 2^61, so I figured it would only take me about 12 hours to bring those 1000 exponents up to 2^63, so probably by the time anyone reads this they'll all be at 2^63. Hopefully I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.
You stepped on my toes a bit there. But no problem. I was taking the range to M332259937 up to 65. I saw your message and dropped the range. I put the core on to a different range to higher level.

I generally peek at the exponent status report to see if it has been assigned (and then if it has shown activity, a lot of the L-L'ers have shown no progress on the supporting TF or P-1).

Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2008-11-24 at 00:46
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-26, 05:47   #44
CADavis
 
CADavis's Avatar
 
Jul 2005
Des Moines, Iowa, USA

2·5·17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CADavis View Post
then start on a new range from 61 - 64 bits

the new range will be starting at 332900021 and eventually go to 332999959,
done, 332.9M - 333M to 64 bits, 116 factors found
CADavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPU72 / MISFIT use for 100M digit range? Uncwilly GPU to 72 64 2013-03-31 02:45
I want a 100M digit Mersenne that.... JuanTutors PrimeNet 8 2012-12-06 13:47
How far along are you in your 100M digit LL test? JuanTutors Lounge 6 2012-02-21 07:36
100M-digit n/k pairs __HRB__ Riesel Prime Search 0 2010-05-22 01:17
100M digit prime Unregistered Information & Answers 10 2010-03-24 20:16

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:46.


Sun Jan 29 08:46:40 UTC 2023 up 164 days, 6:15, 0 users, load averages: 1.38, 1.50, 1.31

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔