mersenneforum.org 332.2M - 333.9M (aka 100M digit range)
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2008-11-14, 22:44   #34
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!

"Wayne"
Nov 2006

52·211 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by CADavis Yeah I switched to Vista 64-bit and it's going approx. twice as fast :-) Is there a way to make the benchmark go to 74bit factors?
Whoo Hoo I just ordered a new Q9550 with Vista64 ... due Tuesday.

Watch me factor now.

 2008-11-16, 05:19 #35 CADavis     Jul 2005 Des Moines, Iowa, USA 2·5·17 Posts I think I'm changing my mind a bit. I figured out how to use the Factoring Effort page to make a worktodo file, and I think I want to do a wide range to lower levels. So what I'm thinking now is to take my current range to 68 bits, then to 70 bits (maybe not though), then start on a new range from 61 - 64 bits the new range will be starting at 332900021 and eventually go to 332999959, which is all only done to 61 bits. what do you think, Uncwilly?
 2008-11-16, 06:45 #36 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 10,891 Posts Fair enough. I haven't been tracking that area at the moment. I am currently trying to clear areas ahead of the LL'ers. I have a few cores doing expos (even those assigned, but showing no signs of more TF) up to 73. It looks like someone found a factor up in the 73 bit range. :)
 2008-11-19, 06:28 #37 jinydu     Dec 2003 Hopefully Near M48 2·3·293 Posts I've found the usernames of two 100M digit LL testers: simcon M332193833 and M332193859 jr007j M332194253 and M332194277
2008-11-19, 19:06   #38
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

2A8B16 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by jinydu I've found the usernames of two 100M digit LL testers: simcon M332193833 and M332193859 jr007j M332194253 and M332194277
There are several others that have expos assigned to them. Some are active, some seem not to be.

 2008-11-21, 06:35 #39 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 10,891 Posts Here is a progress status report for the range from 332192831 to 332259937 Code: Date 11/20/2008 Average bit depth for first 100 expos 71.46 Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 67.96 100th active expo (no factor found) 332197793 1000th active expo (no factor found) 332239723 Unitless total effort number 813536 Number of first 100 exos to 2^71 45 Number of first 1000 exos to 2^70 275 Code: Bit # to bit level or higher 61 1527 62 1259 63 1258 64 1258 65 900 66 849 67 836 68 571 69 280 70 275 71 107 72 84 73 72 74 48 75 10 76 1 77 1 Attached Thumbnails
 2008-11-22, 20:29 #40 James Heinrich     "James Heinrich" May 2004 ex-Northern Ontario 4,073 Posts I grabbed M332203901 a couple weeks ago. So far I've completed TF from 2^71-2^75, as I write this P-1_stage1 is 60% done (P-1 both stages should be done around 10-Dec, then I'll (probably) let it continue TF up to 2^77, which will take me into Feb2009(?). I'll unreserve it once it gets to LL time; I don't have the patience to wait until May 2013 to confirm it's not prime
 2008-11-22, 20:50 #41 James Heinrich     "James Heinrich" May 2004 ex-Northern Ontario 4,073 Posts I noticed that M332252939 to M332292827 have currently only been TF'd to 2^61, so I figured it would only take me about 12 hours to bring those 1000 exponents up to 2^63, so probably by the time anyone reads this they'll all be at 2^63. Hopefully I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.
2008-11-23, 12:30   #42
James Heinrich

"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

1111111010012 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by James Heinrich I noticed that M332252939 to M332292827 have currently only been TF'd to 2^61
1000 exponents TF'd to 2^63; 37 factors found.

2008-11-24, 00:42   #43
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

101010100010112 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by James Heinrich I noticed that M332252939 to M332292827 have currently only been TF'd to 2^61, so I figured it would only take me about 12 hours to bring those 1000 exponents up to 2^63, so probably by the time anyone reads this they'll all be at 2^63. Hopefully I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.
You stepped on my toes a bit there. But no problem. I was taking the range to M332259937 up to 65. I saw your message and dropped the range. I put the core on to a different range to higher level.

I generally peek at the exponent status report to see if it has been assigned (and then if it has shown activity, a lot of the L-L'ers have shown no progress on the supporting TF or P-1).

Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2008-11-24 at 00:46

2008-11-26, 05:47   #44

Jul 2005
Des Moines, Iowa, USA

2·5·17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by CADavis then start on a new range from 61 - 64 bits the new range will be starting at 332900021 and eventually go to 332999959,
done, 332.9M - 333M to 64 bits, 116 factors found

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Uncwilly GPU to 72 64 2013-03-31 02:45 JuanTutors PrimeNet 8 2012-12-06 13:47 JuanTutors Lounge 6 2012-02-21 07:36 __HRB__ Riesel Prime Search 0 2010-05-22 01:17 Unregistered Information & Answers 10 2010-03-24 20:16

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:46.

Sun Jan 29 08:46:40 UTC 2023 up 164 days, 6:15, 0 users, load averages: 1.38, 1.50, 1.31