![]() |
![]() |
#408 |
Quasi Admin Thing
May 2005
11110101102 Posts |
![]()
It's not always bad to be crazy
![]() Just curious, what p value constituted optimal sievedepth on GPU for a 1G range for S3 for n>25K to n=50K? (For those interested, sieving on a CPU had an optimal sievedepth of p=10G for that kind of n-range) Good luck with your effort, once I get back to this project, hopefully late next year or early 2024, I will have some new monsters, of wich some of those ressources will also be dedicated to clearing some k's from S3 among other conjectures ![]() If the removal rate ends around 46%, per doubling of n, you will remove about 350,000 k values ![]() Looking forward to follow your progress - take care ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#409 | |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2×72×71 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#410 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
1B2E16 Posts |
![]()
Attached are the primes for n < 50000 for 20e9 < k < 30e9.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#411 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
1179110 Posts |
![]()
Thanks!
Confirming that you have the range of 6G-123G reserved for S3 n=25K-50K ? Prefer if they are done in k-range order so there are not so many temporary gaps. :-) Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-08-10 at 05:52 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#412 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
695810 Posts |
![]()
Yes. How I submit the results are dependent upon the computers working on the 10G ranges. Two are fast enough to complete a 10G range in about 5 weeks. The others take about twice that time. My "back of the envelope" estimate is to complete in December based upon the progress I have made.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#413 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2×72×71 Posts |
![]()
Attached are the primes for n < 50000 for 10e9 < k < 20e9.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#414 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2·72·71 Posts |
![]()
6G < k < 10G completed to n = 50000. Primes attached.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#415 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
695810 Posts |
![]()
120G < k < 123G completed to n = 50000. Primes attached.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#416 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2×72×71 Posts |
![]()
40G < k < 50G completed to n = 50000. Primes attached.
Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-09-12 at 22:47 Reason: 49G -> 50G |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#417 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2×72×71 Posts |
![]()
30G < k < 40G completed to n = 50000. Primes attached.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#418 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2·72·71 Posts |
![]()
60G < k < 70G completed to n = 50000. Primes attached.
Unfortunately one of my computers testing this range can no longer "see" the M.2 drive that was being used for the testing. I'm hoping the data can be recovered. If not, then I have to resieve that 10G range before testing again. I still estimate completing the range by the end of November. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 2500 | 2023-01-26 05:20 |
Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes | Siemelink | Conjectures 'R Us | 1751 | 2023-01-21 20:37 |
Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 1010 | 2023-01-20 17:22 |
Bases 6-32 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 1420 | 2022-12-30 17:20 |
Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 1140 | 2022-12-26 17:36 |