mersenneforum.org > Math Random thoughts on RH
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2019-04-19, 11:54 #1 devarajkandadai     May 2004 4748 Posts Random thoughts on RH 1) We can say that proving RH is equivalent to proving that zeta(s + it) is a non trivial non-zero when the real part (s) is other than 1/2, irrespective of the imaginary part(t) (to be continued).
2019-04-20, 05:47   #2

May 2004

22×79 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by devarajkandadai 1) We can say that proving RH is equivalent to proving that zeta(s + it) is a non trivial non-zero when the real part (s) is other than 1/2, irrespective of the imaginary part(t) (to be continued).
2) one implies many: I.e. if a zero exists on any line parallel to 1/2 then many ought to exist. If this can be proved we have practicality proved RH.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post jasong Lounge 46 2017-05-09 12:32 Batalov Game 2 - ♔♕♙♘♖♙ - Shaolin Pirates 5 2013-07-26 00:10 unconnected Aliquot Sequences 2 2011-09-19 09:06 Greenk12 Factoring 1 2008-11-15 13:56 Complex33 Software 8 2004-02-04 10:46

All times are UTC. The time now is 03:57.

Wed Feb 8 03:57:19 UTC 2023 up 174 days, 1:25, 1 user, load averages: 0.50, 0.66, 0.77