20130222, 12:46  #34 
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2·2,861 Posts 
How does the rest of the siever compare? It shouldn't be that hard to replace the large prime factoring code in the ggnfs siever if necessary.

20130222, 17:51  #35  
Nov 2003
2^{2}·5·373 Posts 
Quote:
If NFS@Home has reached the limits of GGNFS, what about trying the CADO tools instead? Let's try to improve capabilities! 

20130222, 18:19  #36 
"Nancy"
Aug 2002
Alexandria
100110100011_{2} Posts 
It was a bit faster when I visited EPFL a few years ago. However, I have not worked on that code since, while Thorsten probably worked on his, and I have no idea how they compare with newer lasieve versions.

20130222, 18:21  #37 
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2×2,861 Posts 
If you read above we are working out ways of extending those limits. Correct me if I am wrong but I don't think cado has something capable of replacing msieve for this size job. It looks like above that msieve will soon be our limitation. Putting the cado ecm into ggnfs is purely an easy speedup not an extension of capability.
Eventually I imagine the ggnfs siever will be a problem because of its limitted sieve area but not yet. 
20130222, 18:28  #38 
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 89<O<88
16065_{8} Posts 

20130222, 18:30  #39  
Nov 2003
16444_{8} Posts 
Quote:
If one keeps the size of the sieve area fixed, but increases the sizes of the factor bases, then the yield per specialq over the fixed sieve region will increase. The problem is: so will the number of false hits. You will get more cofactors that do not split into primes less than the large prime bounds. It will take extra time to dispose of these false hits. A faster method of splitting the cofactors will alleviate this difficulty. Last fiddled with by R.D. Silverman on 20130222 at 18:30 Reason: fix pagination 

20130222, 19:12  #40 
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
3,529 Posts 
M1061 was postprocessed with Msieve.
The CADO postprocessing code is perfectly capable of handling large jobs; it was used to factor RSA704, which generated a matrix almost as large as what Greg needed for M1061. In fact the dataset for RSA704 was undersieved and Msieve couldn't handle the lack of excess relations. Each package has different strengths. Whether the CADO tools can handle worldrecordsize jobs is an open question; I can tell you that Msieve surely cannot. 
20130222, 20:26  #41 
"Nancy"
Aug 2002
Alexandria
2,467 Posts 

20130314, 16:11  #42 
Mar 2007
Germany
2^{3}×3×11 Posts 

20130314, 16:33  #43 
Jun 2012
Boulder, CO
2×7×13 Posts 
Almost there!
linear algebra completed 30676793 of 31289453 dimensions (98.0%, ETA 22h29m) 
20130315, 19:49  #44 
Jun 2012
Boulder, CO
2·7·13 Posts 
2801^831 factored
And, here it is. (2801^831)/2800 factors into a 93 digit prime and a 191 digit prime:
Code:
Fri Mar 15 09:30:52 2013 lanczos halted after 494801 iterations (dim = 31289229) Fri Mar 15 09:31:36 2013 recovered 34 nontrivial dependencies Fri Mar 15 09:31:36 2013 BLanczosTime: 59328 Fri Mar 15 09:31:36 2013 elapsed time 16:28:51 Fri Mar 15 09:45:42 2013 Fri Mar 15 09:45:42 2013 Fri Mar 15 09:45:42 2013 Msieve v. 1.50 (SVN exported) Fri Mar 15 09:45:42 2013 random seeds: e392a192 464a7410 Fri Mar 15 09:45:42 2013 factoring 4784427753962229503583191777575386925462640502543527013793934480234680863804447852383959785408791045459809147067083157248015897910382151758867576620242257524246139326208569043470479714282260046673050230392057658284742406595942226610043596316622243579005395853667131475327572196568483 (283 digits) Fri Mar 15 09:45:44 2013 searching for 15digit factors Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 commencing number field sieve (283digit input) Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 R0: 1829715316371090533839726975772594414416841479201 Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 R1: 1 Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 A0: 2801 Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 A1: 0 Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 A2: 0 Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 A3: 0 Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 A4: 0 Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 A5: 0 Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 A6: 1 Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 skew 3.75, size 4.527e14, alpha 1.144, combined = 1.075e14 rroots = 2 Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 commencing square root phase Fri Mar 15 09:45:45 2013 reading relations for dependency 1 Fri Mar 15 09:46:27 2013 read 15644347 cycles Fri Mar 15 09:46:53 2013 cycles contain 43719780 unique relations Fri Mar 15 10:00:12 2013 read 43719780 relations Fri Mar 15 10:06:03 2013 multiplying 43719780 relations Fri Mar 15 11:00:53 2013 multiply complete, coefficients have about 1248.28 million bits Fri Mar 15 11:00:58 2013 initial square root is modulo 397633 Fri Mar 15 12:40:46 2013 sqrtTime: 10501 Fri Mar 15 12:40:46 2013 prp93 factor: 320275002207928618516974240639287722386404036901633806415927872193124566002965261773254007319 Fri Mar 15 12:40:46 2013 prp191 factor: 14938498855605621302344771462931389549628225945089317981474820437041872729327482659006891215676069205302760273883150980375684105951144826837014488372171976593391874894148865313908766630812757 Fri Mar 15 12:40:46 2013 elapsed time 02:55:04 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
29 to 30 bit large prime SNFS crossover  VBCurtis  Factoring  11  20150309 07:01 
How many jobs should I run?  Warlord  Software  12  20131011 22:18 
Advice for large GNFS jobs?  WraithX  Factoring  59  20130730 01:13 
doing large NFS jobs on Amazon EC2?  ixfd64  Factoring  3  20120606 08:27 
Filtering on large NFS jobs, particularly 2^908+1  bdodson  Factoring  20  20081126 20:45 