20220319, 15:47  #3554  
Feb 2017
Nowhere
61·97 Posts 
Quote:
I am willing to disregard what is merely annoying. But misquoting others in reckless disregard for the truth is worse than merely annoying. Brazenly lying about it is even worse. Unfortunately, this user seems to be a slow learner. He has chosen to be recidivist. This is the second time I've resorted to the Clue Bat to try to get his attention. Just like the oldfashioned treatment for ADHD in grade school  Reading and writing and 'rithmetic Taught to the tune of a hickory stick 

20220321, 15:31  #3555 
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
37×271 Posts 
I am with Dr.S. here, ban well deserved.

20220326, 14:21  #3556 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
15026_{8} Posts 
TF & P1 slowing next firsttest milestone
Three users have several P1 or many TF assignments indicating no progress in the last exponents remaining to 109M primality testing milestone. The P1 assigned to one user will expire in a few days, so no big deal there. The TF ~60 count assigned 20220120 and 20220303 to two users in what is now the lowest ~100 not yet PRP tested don't expire until July or August. https://www.mersenne.org/assignments...00000&exdchk=1 And slight random sampling shows the assigned TF are unnecessary; checked exponents were already TF a bit level higher than mersenne.ca's GPU72 level before the latest unneeded TF assignments now interfering with progress.
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20220326 at 14:21 
20220326, 17:22  #3557 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2×5,323 Posts 
Zhang Ruichong has been making progress through their list. Those were all previously assigned to others and had expired. The other exponents below the 109M that had stuck P1's I took care of off the books.

20220326, 18:09  #3558 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2·3^{2}·7·53 Posts 

20220326, 19:23  #3559 
Jan 2021
California
670_{8} Posts 
Zhanh Ruichong has been clearing several of the PM1 assignments each day, the ETAs on them appear to be accurate. In addition, most (if not all) are on exponents that have already had FTC done.
On ones with TF, nranks assignments are not blocking first time checks, they are on exponents that have already had FTC. SWL551 on the other hand has grabbed assignments that haven't had FTC done on them. At least this time around they didn't grab hundreds of assignments in the cat 0/cat 1 range. I haven't been watching them to see if they are clearing, but it's been over 2 months since they were assigned. Last fiddled with by slandrum on 20220326 at 19:25 
20220326, 20:12  #3560 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2·3^{2}·7·53 Posts 
So:
Too many getting PRP without adequate or any P1 first, and too many without proof generation failing to avoid a 100% effort PRPDC. We've had PRP proof generation capability in prime95 (v30.3) since Sep 2020, gpuowl since June 2020 v6.11318. Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20220326 at 20:17 
20220327, 05:04  #3561 
"University student"
May 2021
Beijing, China
2·7·19 Posts 
They have all been tested at least once, so I'm not delaying any of the milestones. You see, most of them have been tested by WR, although without P1 and CERT.

20220327, 05:16  #3562  
"University student"
May 2021
Beijing, China
2·7·19 Posts 
Quote:
Code:
v308 108356371 FPM1 20220323 02:25 8.5 Factor: 996452764760981189944109089 / (P1, B1=471000, B2=41197002) 18.0118 v308 108327223 FPM1 20220321 03:26 6.5 Factor: 2101743747139768387760441 / (P1, B1=439000) 2.6107 v308 108320761 FPM1 20220317 09:51 2.8 Factor: 60009555748293413447823073 / (P1, B1=463000, B2=40465194) 17.6942 And the factor of 108327223 is smooth enough that could be found by bounds as low as B1=50000, B2=100000. The only possible explanation is that they had no prior P1 done. Last fiddled with by Zhangrc on 20220327 at 05:20 

20220327, 12:49  #3563  
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2·3^{2}·7·53 Posts 
Quote:
Best practice would be TF first to suitable level; P1 next to adequate bounds, then PRP with proof generation. Just under half the total PRP equiv resources required this way as the above way; 50 P1 (~1.5 PRP equiv); 47 PRP & proof gen; 47 cert (~0.2 PRP equiv). (Total PRP equiv 48.7; 2x = 97.4) Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20220327 at 12:49 

20220327, 15:34  #3564 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
1A16_{16} Posts 
DC milestone delay
The lone last DC assignment before the 60M DC milestone is reached was reassigned to an account that has made zero progress so far, with a projection of expiration before completion (8 d vs 10). https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...9917901&full=1
https://www.mersenne.org/assignments...rst=1&excert=1 A RadeonVII could complete it in several hours. 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Newer X64 build needed  Googulator  Msieve  75  20220613 14:22 
Performance of cudaecm on newer hardware?  fivemack  GMPECM  14  20150212 20:10 
Cause this don't belong in the milestone thread  bcp19  Data  30  20120908 15:09 
Newer msieves are slow on Core i7  mklasson  Msieve  9  20090218 12:58 
Use of large memory pages possible with newer linux kernels  Dresdenboy  Software  3  20031208 14:47 