Reserved for MF - Sequence 4788 - Page 176

Batalov · 2012-05-13, 06:22

I can kinda agree with that. Even though my own estimate that this will be very soon and doesn't warrant ...ehm... (I've already been rude, so I'll try to choose words more temperantly) ... ok, I'll call this hoarding.

Like not throwing away credit card receipts (worse yet, make copies of these) -- because there could be a mistake in billing. On one hand, yes, true, this can happen and did happen on my memory once or twice in ten years. On the other hand, one's home starts looking like a pawn shop or a dashboard of some cars.

I think we should boldly trust the database.

P.S. Clarification: I mean, we should have some diligent footprints of our computations stored somewhere in own archives (e.g. I believe that I have > 10⁴ ggnfs.logs and polys for hundreds of aliquot sequences, and dozens of memorable C/Hom.C./etc snfs polys, again e.g. my beloved octics); -- just not on the forum. Especially when the results are already in FactorDB and/or near-repunits, Cunn. logs, NFS @ Home records etc

schickel · 2012-05-13, 06:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batalov

IP.S. Clarification: I mean, we should have some diligent footprints of our computations stored somewhere in own archives (e.g. I believe that I have > 10⁴ ggnfs.logs and polys for hundreds of aliquot sequences, and dozens of memorable C/Hom.C./etc snfs polys, again e.g. my beloved octics); -- just not on the forum. Especially when the results are already in FactorDB and/or near-repunits, Cunn. logs, NFS @ Home records etc

Well, how about if we delete the attachments (at least, maybe the messagess too?) after the DB problems are cleaned up?

Batalov · 2012-05-13, 06:45

The future Dilbert says that they've already had been deleted.
Ah wait, it is still May of 2012; he is sometimes confused. ;-)

schickel · 2012-05-13, 06:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prime95

Your wish is granted.

Of course, this is a little less exciting since 933436 happened.....

Code:

933436 12428. sz 166 2^2 * 5^3 * 7 * 13 * 23 * 89 * 433 * 443

schickel · 2012-05-13, 07:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batalov

I think we should boldly trust the database.

As someone once said, "Trust but verify".

I'm keeping a local copy of all the sequences "just in case".....

Batalov · 2012-05-13, 07:25

It is a Russian proverb, yes. (You-know-who picked it from the Russians.)

rajula · 2012-05-13, 11:17

The DB now shows i3363: c116 = 2 * c116. Anyone with more iterations to put there?

Raman · 2012-05-13, 12:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raman

Hi,

This was being certainly the last number that I had seen just
simply before the factorDB crash point

314718: i9869
=
89061363102028401121970356170035861240390590751041341095318236415188850592661162942318064938811849202657831014377534 = 2 * c116

that number which was being stored from into my own PC system, as such, as since, as
as at last, lately

This was being the last number that I had seen line, the thing that I had been written much before.

It should have been 314718: i9823 NOT i9869 at all

The lines corresponding to 314718: i9823 THROUGH i9869 are being missing out

314718: i9823 would seem to have been corrupted within the factor database meanwhile

Does that mean the lines following i9823 would mutate leading to wrong subsequent result iterations,
incorrect values for the lines beyond the line 314718: i9823 which is being after the following line
that is being given away into
id1100000000508647107 -> id1100000000508756358 = 2*c116

Andi47 · 2012-05-13, 12:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by rajula

The DB now shows i3363: c116 = 2 * c116. Anyone with more iterations to put there?

still not stitchible to the file Batalov posted here yesterday. I guess there are still ~40-50 iterations missing.

schickel · 2012-05-13, 15:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by rajula

The DB now shows i3363: c116 = 2 * c116. Anyone with more iterations to put there?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andi47

still not stitchible to the file Batalov posted here yesterday. I guess there are still ~40-50 iterations missing.

I would hazard to guess that Syd may have rolled back recent changes in the DB. That may mean that someone either has to reupload the factorization of the c116 or, assuming it may have been deleted, do it again.....

[Edited to add: Ooops. Looks like a duplicate entry. Check out this and this. Wonder how that will affect things......]

Batalov · 2012-05-13, 17:37

My script is still running and I've uploaded the ending up to +1387, there's a c116 there too (NFS is running).

So we have to fill in from here to here.
It was not only Dubslow, maybe Alex, Jayson?

We need everyone who ran that 2^4, 2^3*5, 2^3 stretch. (Or of course it can be retraced in about one day.)

2012-05-13, 06:22	#1926
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 3²·7·149 Posts	I can kinda agree with that. Even though my own estimate that this will be very soon and doesn't warrant ...ehm... (I've already been rude, so I'll try to choose words more temperantly) ... ok, I'll call this hoarding. Like not throwing away credit card receipts (worse yet, make copies of these) -- because there could be a mistake in billing. On one hand, yes, true, this can happen and did happen on my memory once or twice in ten years. On the other hand, one's home starts looking like a pawn shop or a dashboard of some cars. I think we should boldly trust the database. P.S. Clarification: I mean, we should have some diligent footprints of our computations stored somewhere in own archives (e.g. I believe that I have > 10⁴ ggnfs.logs and polys for hundreds of aliquot sequences, and dozens of memorable C/Hom.C./etc snfs polys, again e.g. my beloved octics); -- just not on the forum. Especially when the results are already in FactorDB and/or near-repunits, Cunn. logs, NFS @ Home records etc Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2012-05-13 at 06:37 Reason: grammer

2012-05-13, 17:37	#1936
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 3²·7·149 Posts	My script is still running and I've uploaded the ending up to +1387, there's a c116 there too (NFS is running). So we have to fill in from here to here. It was not only Dubslow, maybe Alex, Jayson? We need everyone who ran that 2^4, 2^35, 2^3 stretch. (Or of course it can be retraced in about one day.) Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2012-05-13 at 18:24*

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Reserved for MF - Sequence 3408	RichD	Aliquot Sequences	474	2021-03-07 20:28
Reserved for MF - Sequence 3366	RichD	Aliquot Sequences	468	2021-01-27 01:16
Reserved for MF - Sequence 276	kar_bon	Aliquot Sequences	127	2020-12-17 10:05
Assignments are reserved but not showing up	prism019	GPU to 72	6	2020-09-21 22:11
80M to 64 bits ... but not really reserved	petrw1	Lone Mersenne Hunters	82	2010-01-11 01:57

2012-05-13, 06:45	#1928
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 3²×7×149 Posts	The future Dilbert says that they've already had been deleted. Ah wait, it is still May of 2012; he is sometimes confused. ;-)

2012-05-13, 07:25	#1931
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 3²×7×149 Posts	It is a Russian proverb, yes. (You-know-who picked it from the Russians.)

2012-05-13, 11:17	#1932
rajula "Tapio Rajala" Feb 2010 Finland 473₈ Posts	The DB now shows i3363: c116 = 2 * c116. Anyone with more iterations to put there?