![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
19·541 Posts |
![]()
I have now looked for all the results files that I have received on all drives for n=260K-393K. I have sent PM's and Emails when necessary to attempt to locate missing results.
If you haven't gotten a PM or Email from me, thanks for forwarding them all to me. There were really very few missing results. On drive 3, I have ALL results for n=260K-373.8K! In doing all of this, I was able to do the following for ranges where I had all of the results files: 1. Verification of ALL primes for drive 3 for n=260K-373.8K in post 1 of the drive thread, on Karsten's drive 3 web page, and on Karsten's Rieselprime page for k=300-2000. NO ERRORS OR MISSING PRIMES were found! Nice work Karsten for such a large range! Nice work Anon with the results files and helping keep post 1 of the thread updated! 2. Report all primes and ranges at the Primesearch site (that weren't already reserved by others) on drive 3 for n=260K-360K. I just completed that earlier today. 3. I previously verified primes for drives 1 & 2 for n=320K-340K in post 1 of the drive thread, on Karsten's drives 1 & 2 web pages, and on Karsten's Rieselprime page for k=300-2000. Once again, no errors or missing primes were found on his pages. I previously added one missing prime to post 1 of drive 2. 4. Report all primes and ranges at the Primesearch site for drives 1 and 2 for n=320K-340K. I completed that yesterday. I couldn't do it previously because the site kept having problems at the time. I just need a few more straggling results files from 3 people to fully complete the reporting of n=260K-320K to Primesearch for drive 2. With just this small percentage of ranges and primes reported complete to Primesearch, we're already 6th place on # of digits in our primes and 12th place both for prime count and ranges searched. Once I'm able to report n=260K-320K for drive 2, we may be near the top on digits and top 5 or better on the other 2 categories. I now have reserved at Primesearch up to n=480K on drive 1 and up to n=420K on drive 2. It's a tedious time-consuming process to reserve them and report them complete for such a large # of ranges. I'll be glad when I can complete n=260K-320K. I also reserved n=100K-260K for k=1-100 for our double-check drive. Even though all (or most) of the primes will have been found previously, they haven't been reported at Primesearch because k=1-300 was only added there in the last 1-2 years. It may as well get done now with our effort. k=300-1001 has already been completed at the site for the n-range. After I see how we are progressing on the double-check drive (I'll be adding 2-3 cores to it next week), I may reserve all or a portion of k=100-300 for the n-range. I try not to reserve anything that can't be completed in 2 months. Their ranges 'expire' in 2 months, which is really only a guideline that means the admin, at his discretion, can unreserve the ranges for you if he thinks they won't be done. (very rare I think) Congrats to everyone on some nice work! Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
![]()
You mentioned about straggling ranges with results still missing for Drive #2--just to let you know, I'll try to get the LLRnet results file for Beyond's range 302K-205K processed as soon as possible. The problem is that I am really busy this weekend and might not get the chance to do it until a little later. Gary, you may as well consider the results for 302K-305K accounted for, since I have the results files and just need yet to get them processed.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
19·541 Posts |
![]() Quote:
If you don't have time to process the results but have time to check the primes found in them against the primes in post 1 of the drive thread, that'd be helpful. But if not, no big deal. 302K-305K is the only range in the 300K-320K Primesearch range I'm missing. I just recently got everything in the 260K-280K range and will shortly check that range. Gary |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
![]()
Well, I've almost got the processing of the 302K-305K results completed, so I should have the lresults file sent to Gary within the next half hour.
![]() ![]() Edit: Okay, I've got the results processed now! They will be mailed to Gary as soon as I'm finished editing this message. ![]() Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2008-03-31 at 03:00 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
282716 Posts |
![]()
Processing and verification of all results files up to n=380K is now complete for drive 1. All primes were checked vs. the 1st post of drive 1, Karsten's NPLB drive 1 page, and Karsten's k=300-2000 page. He is still working on entering primes and updating ranges on his pages.
All ranges have been completed and all primes have been entered at Primesearch with the exception of k=411 that I am working on now. I will be complete with a couple of file reservations by Saturday for n=393K-395K on drive 1, which is all that is remaining up to n=400K there. I will then start the process for n=380K-400K. Anon has found some missing results in an LLRnet range for n=373.8K-400K for drive 3. Everything had previously been checked for that drive up to n=360K. Once testing is done and the missing results are processed, I'll then start the above process for n=360K-400K for drive 3. Within < 2 weeks, we should have everything complete, checked, and entered in all locations up to n=400K!! On Primesearch, we are now 3rd on ranges completed, 5th on primes found, and....drum roll....FIRST on the # of digits in primes! Way to go team! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Mar 2006
Germany
2·1,433 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Code:
Port 5000 has 12412 lines in knpairs.txt File size of 136,545 first k/n pair 385 450337 last k/n pair 351 399121 so about 9000 other pairs upto n=460k to be done first! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
I ♥ BOINC!
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)
3×7×53 Posts |
![]()
It was exactly 2,679 pairs
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
19×541 Posts |
![]()
OK, let's make port 5000 on drive 3 a priority for a while.
If you finish a range or need some filler work, please put it on port 5000 to get all results to n=460K processed so that we can then process the missing results. There are no previously known primes from the current n-value in port 5000 up to n=463K so plenty of primes waiting to be found! ![]() Thanks, Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reporting partial ECM results? | apsen | PrimeNet | 3 | 2011-07-03 14:54 |
results not reporting | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 2 | 2010-05-23 00:56 |
V5 not reporting results to PrimeNet | edron1011 | Software | 8 | 2009-01-26 16:59 |
Reporting Results | dave_0273 | Marin's Mersenne-aries | 2 | 2005-10-18 12:54 |
Problem with Reporting Results to Primenet | RMAC9.5 | Software | 3 | 2003-11-02 23:06 |