![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
100010110112 Posts |
![]()
So it looks as though the new prime has brought in a considerable amount of new computing power (thanks and welcome to the new users!). The 30-day sustained GIMPS throughput has swollen to a record 380 TFLOP/s, with the theoretical 30-day maximum throughput exploding to 1.25 PFLOP/s. This is the first time that the GIMPS distributed supercomputer has (theoretically) breached the petaflop barrier.
For historical perspective, in November 2005, GIMPS was knocking on the door of 20 TFLOP/s. We now produce nineteen times that: what constituted GIMPS' typical 24-hour throughput a decade ago, is now completed every 76 minutes. It is worth noting that the actual 30-day throughput has been typically 35-40% of the theoretical maximum. Therefore, as the new users continue to complete assignments, I expect that we should sustain 450-500+ TFLOP/s in the next few weeks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 | |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
72·67 Posts |
![]() Quote:
http://www.mersenne.org/primenet/graphs.php |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
21338 Posts |
![]()
GIMPS has set yet another new record for 30-day sustained computing throughput: 405+ TFLOP/s, beating the old record of 400+ TFLOP/s set on 2016-02-19 in the wake of the discovery of the 49th Mersenne prime and the associated influx of new users and computing power.
The maximum theoretical 30-day sustained throughput record remains 1,201+ TFLOP/s, also set on 2016-02-19. The present value of this metric is 1,037+ TFLOP/s, which still places GIMPS in the impressive realm of petaflop-level computing power, while showing a 17.4% increase in computing efficiency from 33.3% to 39.1% overall, in just shy of one year. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#81 | |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
72·67 Posts |
![]() Quote:
There has been discussion on whether/how much to cap GHz-day credit to prevent crazy things like that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 | |
Nov 2008
50110 Posts |
![]() Quote:
ECM on very tiny exponents with very large B2 bounds... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
Sep 2003
32·7·41 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
26×131 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 | |
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
5·223 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 |
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
111510 Posts |
![]()
This is getting as bad (as good?) as the US stock market.
New record: 431.005 TFLOP/s. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 |
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
5·223 Posts |
![]()
New record for 30-day sustained throughput: 436.648 TFLOP/s. The post-M50 crowd seems to be hanging around a little longer than those joining on after previous prime discoveries.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
another defined sequence | MattcAnderson | Miscellaneous Math | 4 | 2017-07-05 08:05 |
Budget PC Throughput | Rodrigo | Hardware | 14 | 2011-09-26 10:16 |
SZPTR - whare is it defined | tichy | Software | 4 | 2010-12-22 09:02 |
how is the throughput calculated? | ixfd64 | PrimeNet | 5 | 2008-05-21 13:39 |
My throughput does not compute... | petrw1 | Hardware | 9 | 2007-08-13 14:38 |