![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Karl-Heinz Hofmann"
Jan 2017
Gr.-Rohrheim Germany
1916 Posts |
![]()
Only a few days left to complete my search up to 2^69 between 2900 M and 2950 M.
My Question is: Who is the person, which is searching between 2800 M and 2900 and above 2950. Gruß Kalli Hofmann |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
"Sam Laur"
Dec 2018
Turku, Finland
5128 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() So, after hansl factored everything up to 2^55 for exponents up to 10G, I started looking at the range 55-64. I started at 2800M and have finished up to 3160M now. To avoid duplication of work, it would be nice to let people know what you're doing, especially James Heinrich... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"Karl-Heinz Hofmann"
Jan 2017
Gr.-Rohrheim Germany
52 Posts |
![]()
Nice to hear from you. First I want to finish my work, before I submit this to James. I run a GTX 1070 on a I7 and a GTX 1060 on a I5. The 1070 needs about 5.1 seconds/M for 2^67 to 2^69 and the 1060 needs 6.5 seconds/M for 2^67 to 2^69. I have done the work up to 2^67 earlier (January - June), since the Level for unfactored M´s rised from 67 to 69. Let me know if we can do something else together for the community. (I´m enviously on your RTX 2080) sydämelliset terveiset Kalli :-)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Sam Laur"
Dec 2018
Turku, Finland
2·3·5·11 Posts |
![]()
Well... it seems that I duplicated some work, but it's not a big deal. However, I found this. You may have missed a factor of M2920306283, the latter one, 141743326582075753 with 56.976 bits.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
52×7×53 Posts |
![]()
I changed the thread title to reflect what you are doing.
29,00M is confuse, I was always thinking you are looking for factors in 29M and didn't know why you only go to 69 bits ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
22×2,333 Posts |
![]()
I moved this thread to where it will be noticed by relevant group
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"Karl-Heinz Hofmann"
Jan 2017
Gr.-Rohrheim Germany
1916 Posts |
![]()
I have finished the Mission. All factored and non factored M´s are done up to 2^69. between 2,90 G and 2,95 G. Does anyone knows, who has done the work between 2,93 G and 2,94 G from 2^69 to 2^71 ? And my question is: Are the factored M´s tested for further factors too? Greetings Kalli
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
2×3×5×109 Posts |
![]()
On a global scale, HansL has been systematically checking the entire 1G-10G range, not stopping after finding the first factor, and that has been done up to 2^57. Above that it is handled on an individual result basis: if your mfaktx result line says that the bitrange was tested completely after finding a factor then it as marked as such, otherwise it is assumed that factoring is stopped after finding the first factor.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Apr 2013
32·13 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I'm not continuing after a factor has been found but I can change that if this is desired. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Apr 2019
5×41 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I also recently did 3G-10G to 2^57, but I temporarily stopped in the middle of processing 1G-3G to 2^57. So parts of that range are not completely done to 2^57. I don't know off the top of my head the exact ranges I covered so far, but I plan to pick it back up soon and complete the job. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"Karl-Heinz Hofmann"
Jan 2017
Gr.-Rohrheim Germany
52 Posts |
![]()
@ramgeis : It's me, between 2940 M and 2950 M up to 2^69. But not from 2^69 to 2^71.
Between 2,90 G and 2,93 G (up to 2^69), I made a big Mistake. I filtered my own results in a way, that only the "not listed factors" were left. I deplore that the "no factor" results got loose. But "no factor" results are important too, now I know. I will do this work again. Gruß Kalli Last fiddled with by Kalli Hofmann on 2019-11-06 at 08:53 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Factors found before ECM starts | MisterBitcoin | YAFU | 1 | 2018-08-10 16:58 |
How are such big factors found? (M1193) | heliosh | PrimeNet | 7 | 2018-01-24 16:54 |
Biggest factors found by P-1 | TheMawn | Lounge | 29 | 2014-12-14 12:43 |
No factors found | aketilander | PrimeNet | 9 | 2011-05-17 11:32 |
CPU Time and Factors Found | Rodrigo | Operation Billion Digits | 8 | 2010-08-14 20:36 |