![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
![]()
The P+1 option is returning as P-1. I don't know if it's that P+1 work is appearing in the P-1 area or if P-1 is being run instead. It says "Assigned to worker 100 (P+1 to B1=1e7)" like it should, then adds an entry for P-1 with B1=5e6. It's happening on this one, but I suppose it'd happen on any:
http://factorization.ath.cx/search.p...69829687120741 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Mar 2006
Germany
132×17 Posts |
![]()
yeah, they just interchanged. Syd has to exchange the text of the buttons.
i've PMed this him few days ago! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Nov 2008
2×33×43 Posts |
![]()
The database is having problems. I can't get it to display any numbers or sequences.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
2·5·23 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Btw, what about a shorter domain? http://factordb.com/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101000010000102 Posts |
![]()
Syd,
A couple of issues: 1. Aliquot sequence 105150 has been hung up "ECM low limits" status for several hours. 2. Aliquot sequence 153090 has the "squared" bug in the last index. Can the last 1 or 2 indexes be manually deleted and the DB allowed to recalculate them to its usual trial factoring of 2000 from the last good index? If possible, I'd like to extend those sequences further. Thank you, Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Factoring database | Syd | FactorDB | 1616 | 2020-01-23 22:54 |
ECM RAM issues | yoyo | GMP-ECM | 7 | 2018-04-28 05:51 |
Windows 10 Issues | Sulamandora | Software | 5 | 2015-08-13 06:47 |
New GPU; new issues... | chalsall | GPU Computing | 18 | 2013-06-12 19:28 |
memory issues? | jcjuice | Hardware | 7 | 2006-01-11 20:41 |