![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
2×5×23 Posts |
![]()
Not yet, maybe later.
I tried it, but it takes ages to finish. I already have > 1M composite numbers with no factors known in the database, the server is way too slow. Quote:
Syd |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Nov 2008
2×33×43 Posts |
![]()
Well I've done M254 and someone's done M277 in the meantime.
All Mersennes up to M500 done. How far have you ECM'd so far? What do you mean by low, medium and high limits? At a guess, 20, 25 and 30 digits, though I am bound to be wrong. I see the workers are working harder now. They're in a race with me! Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2008-12-16 at 13:59 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
E616 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Every composite is automatically assigned for low ecm. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
111001102 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Nov 2008
2×33×43 Posts |
![]()
They didn't even know of factor tables or Alpertron's applet (which I was using)?
Mersennes done up to M550. How much are you doing on near-Cunningham numbers (numbers of the form I'm taking a break now. The workers can do the rest. Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2008-12-16 at 14:53 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
2·5·23 Posts |
![]()
I imported some factor tables using the workers. First the mersenne.org's "factors.cmp", now I'm doing the cunningham tables. Which one should be next?
Last fiddled with by Syd on 2008-12-16 at 15:21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
"Robert Gerbicz"
Oct 2005
Hungary
2×7×103 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2·3,191 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
2·5·23 Posts |
![]()
Now it can display multiple numbers at once, here are some examples:
Display 2^1+1 to 2^100+1 2^x+1,1,100 Display Mersennes from 300 (to 300+100) Mx,300 5^x-3^x+1,10000,10010 however, the number of results is limited to 100 at once. Last fiddled with by Syd on 2008-12-16 at 17:33 Reason: add |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2·3,191 Posts |
![]()
Wow. That's fantastic. Basically, you have single-handedly replaced all current factorisation tables. All it needs now is a reservation engine :)
One tiny glitch: if I search for '1+x!,100,105' then click on '1+104!', the '+' doesn't get ecaped in the HTML, so it takes me to '1 104!' |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany
2·5·23 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() Fixed that one. Now i'll try to fix the bugs R. Gerbicz reported .. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Database for k-b-b's: | 3.14159 | Miscellaneous Math | 325 | 2016-04-09 17:45 |
Factoring database issues | Mini-Geek | Factoring | 5 | 2009-07-01 11:51 |
database.zip | HiddenWarrior | Data | 1 | 2004-03-29 03:53 |
Database layout | Prime95 | PrimeNet | 1 | 2003-01-18 00:49 |
Is there a performance database? | Joe O | Lounge | 35 | 2002-09-06 20:19 |